Originally Posted by DeeDee
Originally Posted by bgbarnes
I still think it is the parents decision and the child should not be denied access to gifted programs- but why wouldn't you redshirted if immaturity is an issue and putting your child in jeopardy of being misdiagnosed and possibly wrongly medicated?

Why we didn't redshirt despite immaturity and 2Eness:

1. Need for appropriate academic work; we felt that our particular kids pay better attention and behave better when there's something novel in it for them.

2. Our most trusted developmental ped. is against redshirting even for kids with disabilities because it's stigmatizing (even the kindergartners know and talk about who's a year older and why) and it deprives them of challenging growth opportunities.

Even in cases of disability or immaturity, redshirting is usually not a clear-cut decision in light of these issues, and the choice should absolutely be made case by case based on what's available at the school as well as the capacities and needs of the child.

What's true for the right side of the bell curve -- mental age, not chronological age should determine placement -- is also true for the left side.

A child with an IQ of 80 will have a mental age of 4 when he is 5 years old. It may make sense to delay putting him in KG until he is 6, when his mental age will be 6*0.8 = 4.8, especially if most of the other kids in KG have mental age >= 5 and the curriculum is designed for such children. The low-IQ 5yo may belong in preschool instead. Concerns about stigmatization should weighed against a child's frustration of being in a class that is over his head.



"To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle." - George Orwell