Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 115 guests, and 47 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    dangyc, HelpMeParent, fishweight, Miller Jack, zandrahernandes6
    11,927 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 748
    C
    CAMom Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 748
    I've been reading here for about a year but another user I know from another board suggested that I ask here for some clarification on DS's testing results. As a "no he does not have ADD" paperwork trail, we had him tested at 5 years, 4 months. Our pediatrician believed that he would probably qualify for Davidsons (he's a PG guy himself!)and suggested testing instead of an ADD eval. Our tester only works with gifted children and gave him the SB-5. She intended to give him the WISC but didn't remember that he wasn't 6 so she switched at the last minute.

    We received subtest scores that look like this:
    Nonverbal-
    Fluid reasoning- 16
    Knowledge - 16
    Quantitative- 17
    Visual-spatial processing- 14
    Working memory- 15

    Verbal-
    Fluid reasoning- 19
    Knowledge- 17
    Quantitative- 14
    Visual-spatial- 14
    Working memory- 17

    FSIQ- 139

    I also have individual scaled scores for the categories. I'm most concerned with a Fluid reasoning score of 144 with a Visual-Spatial score of 123. That seems like a large spread, especially since it looks like he hit the ceiling on the verbal part of the fluid reasoning section?

    We were surprised that his visual-spatial score was his lowest, as he is easily able to do challenging mazes, put together any lego kit you hand him, remember a map from a video game and navigate without returning to it, build crazy art out of junk and more. His tester said that it was more an issue of exposure to certain ideas but didn't give us much on specifics.

    So my questions, after that long rambling post!

    What kinds of exposure is she talking about? Should we be concerned over such a large gap or is this normal? Would it be beneficial to test again later to see if his visual-spatial exposure has improved? What is fluid reasoning anyway?

    TIA!

    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,917
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,917
    Hi - You have a very bright kiddo there! There are some others on the board with much more knowledge about meanings of numbers, but since my DS4 also took the SB-V, I can give you a quote from our report about what fluid reasoning is:

    "Fluid Reasoning is the ability to solve verbal and nonverbal problems using inductive or deductive reasoning. Classic activities such as Matrices require the individual to determine the underlying rules or relationships among pieces of information (such as visual objects) that are novel to the individual. The ability to reason inductively (as in teh Matrices or Verbal Analogies activities) requires the examinee to reason from teh part to the whole, from the specific to the general, or from teh individual instance to the universal principle. In deductive reasoning activities, the examinee is given general information and is required to infer a conclusion, implication, or specific example. In the SB5, the Early Reasoning activity items require the examinee to inspect pictures depicting human activities and deduce the underlying problem or situation by telling a story."

    Also, as others have said on this board, any results are just a snapshot of what your kid was like on a particular day. There could be many factors for why a child doesn't do as well as expected on a particular test (lack of sleep, ability of tester, etc).

    Last edited by st pauli girl; 09/08/08 09:27 AM.
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 748
    C
    CAMom Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 748
    Dottie and St. Paulie-
    Thanks for your feedback! I'm a teacher and I often work with special education or low performing students. A large discrepancy to me generally screams unidentified learning disability so I'm having to retrain my brain that these numbers are not the same.

    The tester did mention in an unrelated topic that DS had never seen a compass rose before so that might have been actually related to one of the visual-spatial questions.

    Off to devour more information...


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Hello from Virginia
    by aeh - 04/24/26 07:23 PM
    What’s important for gifted child at elementary?
    by Space Waves - 04/23/26 07:33 PM
    Prodigy Math App
    by michelson - 04/23/26 06:20 PM
    Planning the whole college thing
    by aeh - 04/22/26 01:50 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5