Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 179 guests, and 45 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Steve Austin, SPAPK12, GTM Dad, TinySassyPants, hbe
    11,620 Registered Users
    March
    S M T W T F S
    1
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 2 of 2 1 2
    aeh #206897 12/03/14 07:13 PM
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    Originally Posted by aeh
    Interesting Belin-Blank presentation on use of CogAT and ITBS in gifted selection process (cut & paste into search engine). Doesn't recommend using the CogAT composite score, but the Verbal paired with Reading, and the QN paired with Mathematics:
    faculty.education.uiowa.edu/docs/dlohman/icn_full_day_using_cogat.ppt?

    This appears to be what my district is doing, only they are not taking averages, like averaging the verbal CogAT and the Reading achievement, and then averaging the quant CogAT and Math Achievement. They want ALL of the scores to be above the 98th percentile. If they have enough spaces open for the highly gifted program then they will take EITHER quant/math or verbal/reading, but still, both scores in each category need to be above 98th percentile. So someone could be a math genius with achievement scores at 99.9th percentile but make a few careless errors on the CogAT and not qualify for gifted services.

    sunnyday #206898 12/03/14 07:16 PM
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    Originally Posted by sunnyday
    Our entire district is about 930 students, K through 12. I estimate there are 2-4 classrooms of 15-24 students per grade. But here is the quote from the superintendent. "Typically, across the student population, only 1-2% of students are found to qualify as highly capable. In (our district), out of 46 nominations, one student will proceed to receive services."

    Their math is definitely flawed, and this is where the inequity of the whole thing starts to irk me. Many of the brightest second graders I know weren't even nominated (parents and teachers were invited to nominate last June.)

    I don't understand why they are even bothering to test all of the kids if they are intending to give one student services. I thought our district was bad, in that they stick students in fake "cluster groups" which don't actually do anything. They get money from the State and are required to identify gifted students, but in terms of actual services, they don't need to do a thing.

    aeh #206899 12/03/14 07:52 PM
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 86
    S
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 86
    Originally Posted by aeh
    That being said, this is just under a 1.5 SD difference between his ability and language achievement, which approaches significance as a discrepancy. (Math is pretty much in line with the ability measure.) My first question would be, do you see this IRL, as well (that his math is stronger than his reading/writing)? If this appears to represent a clinically significant difference (not just a fluke of testing), then I would be inclined to view it as more "real" than just an artifact of lack of exposure to higher-level instruction, mainly because it is in the language area, rather than the math area.

    Thank you! Yes, his language is generally depressed compared to his mathematical reasoning. He doesn't use particularly advanced vocabulary, was late to start talking, didn't read until he was 6 despite his own effort, etc.

    Quote
    And, btw, I would not describe all of his ITBS results as quite mediocre. 90th %ile in math is not too shabby (+1.3 SD).

    No, mediocre was a bad word choice! After getting over the sting of not making the cut-off, I'm quite proud of the areas where he did better than 80% of nationally normed 2nd graders. He's not in a high-achieving district, and I've actively worked not to exceed the classroom level of content by too much when we work at home (going deeper not farther). I certainly didn't expect him to ceiling any of the tests, so a SD or so above the norm is great.

    Quote
    FYI, this old study using the WAIS-III found negligible correlation between ITBS scores and FSIQ:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666826/

    Embarrassingly, this is a little reassuring. I didn't want to be wrong in my perception that he's at least mildly gifted, but I've known so many kids (including ones who scored much lower on CogAT) who got close to 99th percentile across the board in ITBS. I remember doing so as a child myself. But it's also a little annoying. Since I don't trust my district administrators to understand gifted education, I feel like their use of high ITBS results as a qualifier is another mark against them.

    Quote
    Interesting Belin-Blank presentation on use of CogAT and ITBS in gifted selection process (cut & paste into search engine). Doesn't recommend using the CogAT composite score, but the Verbal paired with Reading, and the QN paired with Mathematics:
    faculty.education.uiowa.edu/docs/dlohman/icn_full_day_using_cogat.ppt?

    I found a (high SES) district near here that does something like this, assigning a point value to the percentile ranks on both tests and then using this combined picture to use as their guideline for qualification. DS still wouldn't hit the mark, but it makes a little more sense to me than letting the ITBS composite and CogAT composite each be an all-or-nothing benchmark.

    Thanks so much for your analysis, it clears some things up for me!

    sunnyday #207617 12/12/14 07:44 AM
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 86
    S
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 86
    So, as a follow-up, I plan to send the district superintendent (who is also the special services director this year, apparently) a note politely requesting my son's full score reports for my information. While I'm at it, is there anything I could mention about improving this process? It feels like their approach is a waste of resources and I don't understand at all how they expect to improve the education of a 1 in a 1000 student by identifying them in this way. There are certainly no gifted education specialists in the district, and the student won't receive the benefits of peer interaction, so...what's the point?

    I'm also wondering if I could request a meeting with the school psychologist who evaluated the results, and see if she had any light to shed on the ability/achievement gap.

    Does anyone have any advice for moving forward and communicating appropriately with the school or the district?

    I do have to say that we're lucky in DS's teacher this year, apparently he was able to have a full-fledged "argument" with her over a math problem this week (they came to the agreement that the problem was poorly worded) and in general she's really gone to the mat to differentiate his work. Between that and the work we do at home he's probably getting his needs met adequately. His sister, though, might need subject acceleration by the time she's in first grade next year so I need to figure out this whole administration hierarchy and how to work with them ASAP.

    sunnyday #207618 12/12/14 07:50 AM
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 86
    S
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 86
    And...yikes. Just read that the decision must be appealed within 10 business days. I think we got the letter last Tuesday, so today's the 9th business day. I still don't plan to appeal per se but in case they rethink things at all it's better sooner than later.

    Page 2 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Opinions on School
    by lossstarry - 03/13/25 01:58 AM
    US Colleges Ranked by IQ
    by thx1138 - 03/11/25 10:20 AM
    Book Recommendations and Library Associations
    by munmin - 03/10/25 09:35 PM
    Grade Acceleration K-1-2
    by gtehhaa - 03/10/25 06:32 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5