0 members (),
267
guests, and
44
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
So I am stumped. Help me please wise parents! DS7 has a field trip next week. (He is partially homeschooled.) He doesn't want to go on the field trip. So, I didn't send in his permission slip. Three separate staff members have called DH and I to find out why DS isn't going and to tell us that he "must" go. The principal even pulled DS out of art to question him. She told him that he "must" go on the trip. What is this all about? The only answer I get is that field trip are important "educational events".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 163
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 163 |
That sounds weird. Can you tell us where it is (without giving away too much information about yourself)?
I know that I was looking into a school that had a really big focus on field trips and parents had to be OK with the kids going on overnight trips. It was a big part of the school. But it sounds like this isn't something like that...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
It's a trip to a nature center. DS has already BTDT at this particular place. He is not opposed to field trips. He'd just rather have a full homeschool day that day.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
That is weird. I'd be tempted to sign the slips and then call him out absent that day - kids get sick! I always offer my DS the option of opting out of school trips DS has never taken me up on it but if he did, I wouldn't even bother telling the school we choose not to go, I'd just call him out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
The school can't legally compel your child to attend. It's a bit creepy that they're paying your decision so much attention. Why are four adult professionals so personally invested in whether a 7yo attends a day trip to a nature center?
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
Maybe they've got 99 others going and they need 100 to get a group discount.
Maybe someone is keeping statistics on field trips and the school wants to boost their numbers.
Maybe they'll get a little more money if your kid goes on the trip (and is on the school clock).
Maybe if they make it optional for anyone, then they have to make it optional for everyone, and they don't want to do that for some reason.
I have absolutely no idea. It's very bizarre that they're so secretive about their real reasons.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761 |
there's a reason why it's called a PERMISSION slip ... no permission, no field trip. "must" is not an answer. If they don't have any better answer than that, why even bother with them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
I still can't figure any of this out. But now I am compelled to get to the bottom of it! This school often operates in a bizarre way. So, this weird situation is not so weird for them. The principal kind of freaked DS out though. She really grilled him and he didn't understand what the issue was.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
Is it because he will still be at school that day but not on the trip so they are wondering what to do with him? or will you be keeping home? Maybe that's their concern?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Is it because he will still be at school that day but not on the trip so they are wondering what to do with him? or will you be keeping home? Maybe that's their concern? He will be at home.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
Is it because he will still be at school that day but not on the trip so they are wondering what to do with him? or will you be keeping home? Maybe that's their concern? He will be at home. Okay, well, I am quite stumped myself. Creepy indeed. How odd!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
I still can't figure any of this out. But now I am compelled to get to the bottom of it! This school often operates in a bizarre way. So, this weird situation is not so weird for them. The principal kind of freaked DS out though. She really grilled him and he didn't understand what the issue was. How do you usually deal with their weirdness? Or have they risen to a whole new level of weirdness?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489 |
I have had schools go weird on me that my child needs to do x or y because of his socialization. Could it be something along those lines. They think he NEEDS the experience going on the bus, following directions, etc..
Another possibility for their odd behavior. Are they asking for a donation for the trip? Field trips are one of the few things schools in my area can still ask for $$ to help defray the cost. Yet, they don't want to deny any child the ability to go on the field trip. So if I child a parent didn't return the money & permission slip the school might assume it was because a parent couldn't pay and didn't want to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032 |
MK is quite right -- if you have to sign a permission slip for him to attend, then obviously it isn't a "must". That's what permission slips are about!
Our school has assignments associated with at least some field trips -- DS11 went on the 7th grade field trip to the dam when he was in 5th grade (because he was taking classes in several grades and wormed his way into all the field trips) and then this past year when he was actually IN 7th grade, he chose instead to go to his track meet that day and missed it, and he had a zero for the assignment of writing up water test results. But if the grade for a possible assignment doesn't bother you or him, I see no reason he "has" to go.
DD freaked out this past year about the 2nd grade trip to the science museum, but I knew it was just fear of the unknown and made her go anyway -- of course, as I knew she would, she liked it.
Stick to your guns, or if it's not a battle worth fighting up front, do as someone else suggested and sign the slip and then keep him home anyway. What can they do?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
Sign the slip and call him in sick that day.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639 |
there's a reason why it's called a PERMISSION slip ... no permission, no field trip. "must" is not an answer. If they don't have any better answer than that, why even bother with them. If there is no permission slip returned, then it means that the parent does not want the child to go. They might be calling you because the only reason that they could come up with for the lack of permisssion slip is that you forgot - some people cannot understand that you might not be interested in something so wonderful as a school offered field trip
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035 |
Usually if people don't return a permission slip it is because they forgot or the kid never gave it to the parent so it could just be that. If the trip is on a day he is usually at school maybe they are worried about what to do with him if they don't know you are happy to have him home. Perhaps the next month's worth of lessons are going to be based on the trip. I would approach the teacher myself and ask what is going on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Thanks for the feedback all. Oh don't worry - I have no problem sticking to my guns. I was just asking y'all because I thought someone might have some insight. It's rather weird the whole situation. We'll see how it unfolds.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
We look forward to updates. What a fun topic!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
If a student here has a certain number of unexcused absences, like 10 or 14, or tardies (if a child is even one minute late they mark it as a tardy) the school calls CPS and there is a truancy case. I think once a kid hits 14 absences, they have to bring in doctor's notes. Parents have access to an online acct. and I was looking at DS's page yesterday, and they have documented every absence and the reason for it (sick, medical appt., unexcused, etc). There is even a graph showing the percentage of sick days vs. unexcused, etc.
I wonder if this could have to do with that....they are trying to make a case that there are too many unexcused absences? I don't know, just thought I'd throw that out there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498 |
I would not assume malicious intent until you have evidence of it. Give them a call-- we will all be most curious.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,808
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,808 |
We also attended a school in which the field trips were considered required and parents were not allowed to attend (especially the overnights, which freaked me out in a big way since they started those in 4th grade). If the child did not attend the field trip, then they received a zero for that day. DS was so far ahead, who cared?
I always managed to schedule a doctor appointment those days.
I figure that very few things in life are MUST dos. How DS handles different situations can be dicey without me there. So I figure it's my call - not the school's (who treats everyone the same).
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
We also attended a school in which the field trips were considered required and parents were not allowed to attend (especially the overnights, which freaked me out in a big way since they started those in 4th grade). If the child did not attend the field trip, then they received a zero for that day. DS was so far ahead, who cared?
I always managed to schedule a doctor appointment those days.
I figure that very few things in life are MUST dos. How DS handles different situations can be dicey without me there. So I figure it's my call - not the school's (who treats everyone the same). Whoah I am really shocked that this can happen. Are these private schools? Quite honestly, my parents, who were seriously not great parents and who were of the era of 'benign neglect' were never comfortable with us doing anything over-night. As we got older they relented, of course, if we really wanted to campfire girls camp weekend, etc. But let me tell you NO ONE would have MADE them send their kids away overnight at any age. They were seriously uncomfortable with that. Actually our very first, first grade field trip my brother and I were called out sick for because my parents were not comfortable with us going. My mom was so pissed when I had admitted to the nun (who did grill me on it) that we weren't really sick that day but rather my parents weren't comfortable sending us on the field trip. Anyway, I am really, really shocked schools would insist on stuff like this. People should challenge this stuff legally. When a kid is under the age of 18 I would highly doubt that any court would allow a school to veritably force parents to send their children off of school grounds or away overnight. Quite frankly, after a terrible bout with bed bugs brought home from a retreat place (and literally thousands of dollars spent in damage and extermination costs) I am not keen on sending my boys to any camps anywhere for that reason for quite awhile even though they would love it. Of course I have the additional problem with life-threatening allergies with one of them - another reason I'd be really unhappy with such a policy. I just do not think it is right that a school could compel kids to go places off school grounds or overnight and punish them if they do not. My kids love to do them (and the older loves to go places overnight) but I find such a compulsion to really be an assault on parental rights.
Last edited by Irena; 06/11/14 06:16 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,946
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,946 |
I pick and choose field trips. They cost money and some are a waste of time. Some are necessary for credit so I send my kids to those, but others are of questionable value-- really 17.00 to go see a play at the high school? A basketball game at the local college for 25.00?
Overnight trips in public school are incompatible with my introverted boy and have never and will never be happening, saving 250.00!
And parent chaperones have to pay that sum too. Who has 500.00 to spend on a field trip? (I can't believe the parents line up for this opportunity, but they do).
Many kids opt out. We get emails that beg parents to send their kids and set a goal of 100% participation. But parents need to make the decision.
If you are sending your child to a school that is voluntary, it's a different story.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
While I agree with most everyone said above about the school I do have one question. Why is it a 7 year olds decision if he doesn't wants to go on a field trip?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
I would just ask. Politely. "I'm sorry, but we had something else planned for that day." (I assume this is fine bc of the homeschooling arrangement.) "I'm sorry if this is creating an issue for you, though! Is there a logistical reason why it's important for him to attend?"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
The staff is being flat-out creepy. I'd make sure they know that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
While I agree with most everyone said above about the school I do have one question. Why is it a 7 year olds decision if he doesn't wants to go on a field trip? Why should I pay for something that my son doesn't want to do? Also, why shouldn't he have input? He understands out current arrangement and situation. He is partially homeschooled. He knows that I am available for a full day of homeschool - and he will do just that. He is telling me that he would rather spend the day at home doing homeschool work than on this trip. I don't see the problem. If no one was home to offer him this option, then he would have to go on the trip.
Last edited by somewhereonearth; 06/11/14 08:38 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
While I agree with most everyone said above about the school I do have one question. Why is it a 7 year olds decision if he doesn't wants to go on a field trip? Why should I pay for something that my son doesn't want to do? Because it's about power! You must exert your power regardless of how meaningless! You must take choice and control away from your kid in any way possible! How else will he learn to blindly obey no matter what!?!? (in case it's not obvious, completely joking and being sarcastic here) Personally, kids need a sense of control and of choice - I give it when I can (obviously within reason) I try not to take away control in a purposeless way because, really, the kid in such a situation will just tune out anyway. That is just my personal parenting philosophy and that's why my 7 year old (now 8) usually got a choice on field trips... it works really well for us. It seems especially important for my gifted kiddo.
Last edited by Irena; 06/11/14 08:41 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
The staff is being flat-out creepy. I'd make sure they know that. Bingo-- and I might be a little more cheeky about this than Ultramarina, but still get the same point across-- Wow-- must be some Kool-Aid that they plan to serve on the trip if it's compulsory. I'm just wondering what happens if my child misses the indoctrination portion of the program-- can you explain?
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
I seriously think they do not realize that he is planning to stay home that day. I imagine if I didn't sign a permission slip for a trip at my son's school the teachers would be a little frantic wondering what they will do with him if I expect him to be able to be at school that day but not have permission to attend the trip. YKWIM? I am sure once she tells them he will be home that day they will be fine. No school can be this weird... at least not openly! (or can they???)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639 |
I seriously think they do not realize that he is planning to stay home that day. I imagine if I didn't sign a permission slip for a trip at my son's school the teachers would be a little frantic wondering what they will do with him if I expect him to be able to be at school that day but not have permission to attend the trip. YKWIM? I am sure once she tells them he will be home that day they will be fine. No school can be this weird... at least not openly! (or can they???) Our school's permission slip says explicity that those who opt out of the field trip will be placed in the classroom of another teacher for the duration of the trip. I think that this is normal operating procedure for most schools.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032 |
Yes, our school always has the kids who aren't on the field trip staying with a teacher and doing ...something. I don't know what, since my kids have never missed a field trip except when they were sick or on some other school thing. But I do know they have a contingency plan for those who aren't allowed to go for whatever reason. I wouldn't even hazard a guess anymore as to how weird a school can be -- these are places, after all, that suspend kindergarteners for biting PopTarts into gun shapes, or punish kids who get bullied for their My Little Pony lunch boxes. There is no end to the weirdness.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
I seriously think they do not realize that he is planning to stay home that day. I imagine if I didn't sign a permission slip for a trip at my son's school the teachers would be a little frantic wondering what they will do with him if I expect him to be able to be at school that day but not have permission to attend the trip. YKWIM? I am sure once she tells them he will be home that day they will be fine. No school can be this weird... at least not openly! (or can they???) Our school's permission slip says explicity that those who opt out of the field trip will be placed in the classroom of another teacher for the duration of the trip. I think that this is normal operating procedure for most schools. Cool! That is not what ours say at all! I guess they do not necessarily want to highlight that parents have a third option (one being attending the trip, two being staying home instead of going on the trip and three being getting to send your child to school that day but still get to opt of trip). Interesting. But I do think that if someone pushed on the issue, the school would do just that - put the child in anther class for the day or something... I think they just do not necessarily want it to be obvious that there is a choice. That's just how our school is... ETA: Oh and half the time you can't make head or tail out of the permission slip - many times it will have the wrong dates or wrong times, etc... one had conflicting dates and times throughout the sheet so you havd no real idea exactly when the trip was and for what time!
Last edited by Irena; 06/11/14 09:28 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639 |
I guess they do not necessarily want to highlight that parents have a third option (one being attending the trip, two being staying home instead of going on the trip and three being getting to send your child to school that day but still get to opt of trip). Interesting. But I do think that if someone pushed on the issue, the school would do just that - put the child in anther class for the day or something... I think they just do not necessarily want it to be obvious that there is a choice. It is the job of the school to keep the child in campus if the parent opts the child out of the field trip. Field trips are not mandatory. Staying home involves the parent taking time off from other things to watch the child. So, the contingency plan of the school is to put your child who is not on the field trip in another classroom of the same grade or a close enough grade for however long the trip takes. In our school, when the whole grade goes on the trip on the same day, the child not on the trip is sometimes left with the front desk and admins who provide work packets, craft packets etc and then send the child to PE with another grade and such things. Essentially, the child is fully taken care of - maybe a wasted day for the child, but they do "something" at school.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
Cost was never involved in your original statement. I just never heard of 7 year olds making parental decisions. I certainly never would of asked my 7 year old for any input.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
Cost was never involved in your original statement. I just never heard of 7 year olds making parental decisions. I certainly never would of asked my 7 year old for any input. Well that's you. I don't parent that way. As far as I am concerned, if it involves my son having to go somewhere for several hours he gets a say and his say is, at the very least, considered. For us, it is not just a "parental" decision - he gets a input in what happens to him and, personally, I like how that shapes our relationship AND I think it really provides a scaffolding in his building his own problem-solving and decision-making skills. But, then again, I had a really bright mature 7 year old.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
I guess they do not necessarily want to highlight that parents have a third option (one being attending the trip, two being staying home instead of going on the trip and three being getting to send your child to school that day but still get to opt of trip). Interesting. But I do think that if someone pushed on the issue, the school would do just that - put the child in anther class for the day or something... I think they just do not necessarily want it to be obvious that there is a choice. It is the job of the school to keep the child in campus if the parent opts the child out of the field trip. Field trips are not mandatory. Staying home involves the parent taking time off from other things to watch the child. So, the contingency plan of the school is to put your child who is not on the field trip in another classroom of the same grade or a close enough grade for however long the trip takes. In our school, when the whole grade goes on the trip on the same day, the child not on the trip is sometimes left with the front desk and admins who provide work packets, craft packets etc and then send the child to PE with another grade and such things. Essentially, the child is fully taken care of - maybe a wasted day for the child, but they do "something" at school. I agree with it. And I am pretty sure my Ds's school does the same ... I just don't think they want it made obvious.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761 |
Cost was never involved in your original statement. I just never heard of 7 year olds making parental decisions. I certainly never would of asked my 7 year old for any input. I'd think it's only natural to give your child a chance to express their opinion about field trips (or any other trips for that matter). Especially since we're talking about gifted kids here who in many ways think beyond their years! We homeschool now so it's not an issue but I would not make either of our sons go on a trip they wouldn't want to go on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
Cost was never involved in your original statement. I just never heard of 7 year olds making parental decisions. I certainly never would of asked my 7 year old for any input. I'd have thought it was obvious, but apparently it needs saying: there's a huge difference between "7 year olds making parental decisions" and "7 year olds having a voice and being heard." I certainly would never have made a parental decision without at least hearing what my 7yo had to say about it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
My child in many ways is gifted beyond her years.(She has Geometry in 7th grade next year for example). Just because their gifted doesn't mean though they have common sense (more than non gifted) and know what's best for themselves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
But the first two lines of the original statement was he didn't want to go so I didn't sign the slip. It sounded pretty obvious to me who made the decision.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761 |
But the first two lines of the original statement was he didn't want to go so I didn't sign the slip. It sounded pretty obvious to me who made the decision. Why would you make a kid go on a trip when they don't want to? We're talking about a field trip and far too many times these have very little to do with actual education so unless I thought that there was a real need for the child to go, I'd not make them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761 |
My child in many ways is gifted beyond her years.(She has Geometry in 7th grade next year for example). Just because their gifted doesn't mean though they have common sense (more than non gifted) and know what's best for themselves. This is a part time homeschooled child. He's probably used to making a lot of decisions regarding his education.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Cost was never involved in your original statement. I just never heard of 7 year olds making parental decisions. I certainly never would of asked my 7 year old for any input. I'd have thought it was obvious, but apparently it needs saying: there's a huge difference between "7 year olds making parental decisions" and "7 year olds having a voice and being heard." I certainly would never have made a parental decision without at least hearing what my 7yo had to say about it. I'd have been extremely foolhardy to try to do that to my particular 7yo, speaking frankly. No, she doesn't "make all her own decision" even now, at 14. But she makes more of them than she did at 7, and even then she made more of them than she had at 3. I figured that there had been discussion about the field trip, which the OP was not sharing the specific details of, and which I'm not really entitled to anyway. Having lived through this age with a PG child, and the seven years past it, as well... I'll say this much: I think it's a wise parent that rewards logical and rational argumentation in such children at seven. That was always our condition for having one's voice heard-- provide me with REASONS, not whining, and be prepared to back your opinion just as I'd ask another adult to. Do that, and your opinion counts for a lot more. Just because the school thinks a field trip is a good idea doesn't mean that they are more RIGHT about that than the child who thinks that it is not.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
The staff is being flat-out creepy. I'd make sure they know that. Bingo-- and I might be a little more cheeky about this than Ultramarina, but still get the same point across-- Wow-- must be some Kool-Aid that they plan to serve on the trip if it's compulsory. I'm just wondering what happens if my child misses the indoctrination portion of the program-- can you explain?This x2. Any adult that shows this kind of inordinate interest in having access to a child unaccompanied by a parent is a huge red flag.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
Because,and this story isn't a good example, in life you don't always get what you want.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
Because,and this story isn't a good example, in life you don't always get what you want. You might find the research on outcomes of authoritative vs. authoritarian parenting interesting. http://www.parentingscience.com/authoritative-parenting-style.html
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
Enh...I don't think it's a red flag, really. I think schools are just bureaucratic and odd. I also think it's possible that it's something like what 22B proposed--they get a discount for X number of kids, etc. Maybe they received money from a donor to take X kids. There are odd things like that operating behind the scenes at schools. I tend to be the kind of parent that teachers disclose things to (or so it seems--not all teachers, btw) so I've had teachers tell me things of this sort. ("I'm supposed to make her do that phonics program every day because we're required to by XYZ mandate, but she doesn't need to, so I fill out the form and let her read." "We need to meet numbers for that, so I just say he's here even though he's across the hall getting enrichment." --These are not totally accurate examples, but this kind of thing.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761 |
Because,and this story isn't a good example, in life you don't always get what you want. This sounds so much like what schools are trying to tell us about our kids who understand more and want more and they get to hear "tough life, you don't always get what you want, so get used to it, learn to sit, wait and listen". Isn't that what most of us fight against on a daily basis on behalf of our children?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
I agree. People tend to like to bash schools on here. I think someone said earlier but my guess is they didn't want to leave a teacher behind just for one kid but they didn't want to give that as their reason.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
I never heard that sit wait and listen before but maybe that's me. I guess I must be the only one that lives in an area where schools are good. My comment really had nothing to do with schools.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363 |
I also don't see it as a red flag at all. It could be any of the reasons mentioned above. I'd also consider that they might want him to attend because the field trip is directly related to seething that is currently being studied in class. Maybe our schools are different than elsewhere, but the vast majority of my kids' field trips are either related to current classroom studies (most field trips), classroom community building (typically only at beginning or end of the school year), or arts appreciation or traveling special exhibit in town. The third things on my list are the only trips is really consider optional - and I would still send my kids because I think they are worthwhile and they (here) are usually free or much lower cost than to the general public.
Have you asked the school yet why it's mandatory?
polarbear
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
Cost was never involved in your original statement. I just never heard of 7 year olds making parental decisions. I certainly never would of asked my 7 year old for any input. The OP said, DS7 has already been to this place enough, so doesn't feel like going again just now, and besides they were planning to homschool all day that day, so going on a redundant field trip would just be a disruption. In other words it's just a common sense decision.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,390 |
I think it's a wise parent that rewards logical and rational argumentation in such children at seven. That was always our condition for having one's voice heard-- provide me with REASONS, not whining, and be prepared to back your opinion just as I'd ask another adult to. Do that, and your opinion counts for a lot more. I agree with this, and I'll post an article that I think I've posted here before, but is relevant to this discussion: How to Teach a Child to Argue
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 358
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 358 |
My ds 11 has always liked to go on field trips. If he said he didn't want to go I would wonder why and hear him out. I can't imagine never asking him for input, even at 7 I wanted him to be part of the conversation.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
It is the parent's decision, and they can decide after hearing the reasons to go or not. OP's DS7 has already given reasons he needn't go (already been there, wants to school all day at home that day). Nobody else has given any reasons why he should go, so ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035 |
If a student here has a certain number of unexcused absences, like 10 or 14, or tardies (if a child is even one minute late they mark it as a tardy) the school calls CPS and there is a truancy case. I think once a kid hits 14 absences, they have to bring in doctor's notes. Parents have access to an online acct. and I was looking at DS's page yesterday, and they have documented every absence and the reason for it (sick, medical appt., unexcused, etc). There is even a graph showing the percentage of sick days vs. unexcused, etc.
I wonder if this could have to do with that....they are trying to make a case that there are too many unexcused absences? I don't know, just thought I'd throw that out there
. Are you serious? That is crazy. Here it would take a lot more than that (like 6 months non attendance) to get a truancy case taken though if my child were late to school every day the school social worker might get involved. The only other thing I can think of is that they think you are deliberately preventing your child from attending when he wants to go because you don't want him exposed to things without you being there to control what he sees/does. I wouldn't ask ds7's opinion on a field trip but I would listen if he expressed an opinion. You don't always get what you want in life but I'm not sure you need to spend your childhood preparing for this. I'm assuming he gets a little practice anyway as most people insist of some diet and sleep limitations. Besides if life isn't fair you should work to make it fair not shrug your shoulders and hope you are always on the right side of the unfairness.
Last edited by puffin; 06/11/14 01:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
If a student here has a certain number of unexcused absences, like 10 or 14, or tardies (if a child is even one minute late they mark it as a tardy) the school calls CPS and there is a truancy case. I think once a kid hits 14 absences, they have to bring in doctor's notes. Parents have access to an online acct. and I was looking at DS's page yesterday, and they have documented every absence and the reason for it (sick, medical appt., unexcused, etc). There is even a graph showing the percentage of sick days vs. unexcused, etc.
I wonder if this could have to do with that....they are trying to make a case that there are too many unexcused absences? I don't know, just thought I'd throw that out there
. Are you serious? That is crazy. Here it would take a lot more than that (like 6 months non attendance) to get a truancy case taken though if my child were late to school every day the school social worker might get involved. I know kids who habitually missed 30+ days of school each year, and no truancy case was generated, despite this wording in the law: "A student shall be considered habitually absent or habitually tardy when either condition continues to exist after all reasonable efforts by any school personnel, truancy officer, or other law enforcement personnel have failed to correct the condition after the fifth unexcused absence or fifth unexcused occurrence of being tardy within any school semester." Policy and practice don't often match.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
I never heard that sit wait and listen before but maybe that's me. I guess I must be the only one that lives in an area where schools are good. My comment really had nothing to do with schools. No your comment had nothing to do with schools. Rather, your comment was a snide remark on the OP's parenting and it implied that any decent sane parent would never take their 7 year old's feelings on the issue into consideration (or any issue apparently!) Yeah, I noticed. As you can see, many of us do not share this philosophy and we have pretty great kids so... I guess we agree to disagree on the issue and move on as, clearly , the OP is standing by her decision to honor her child's feelings on the matter whether you think it is purely a "parental" decision or not. And, quite honestly, in life, a lot of times you do get what you want - I know I do ! I guess I never learned that lesson of 'you just gotta do what your told whether you like it or not 'cause that is life!' So glad for that!
Last edited by Irena; 06/11/14 01:17 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
I still can't figure any of this out. But now I am compelled to get to the bottom of it! This school often operates in a bizarre way. So, this weird situation is not so weird for them. The principal kind of freaked DS out though. She really grilled him and he didn't understand what the issue was. How do you usually deal with their weirdness? Or have they risen to a whole new level of weirdness? The weirdness is getting weirder. As of the past 3-4 months I do very well with their weirdness. I'm cordial and have learned to say, "No thank you. Let's just agree to disagree." And then just move on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
The staff is being flat-out creepy. I'd make sure they know that. The letter is being drafted. It has been and will be communicated again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
I never heard that sit wait and listen before but maybe that's me. I guess I must be the only one that lives in an area where schools are good. My comment really had nothing to do with schools. No your comment had nothing to do with schools. Rather, your comment was a snide remark on the OP's parenting and it implied that any decent sane parent would never take their 7 year old's feelings on the issue into consideration (or any issue apparently!) Yeah, I noticed. As you can see, many of us do not share this philosophy and we have pretty great kids so... I guess we agree to disagree on the issue and move on as, clearly , the OP is standing by her decision to honor her child's feelings on the matter whether you think it is purely a "parental" decision or not. And, quite honestly, in life, a lot of times you do get what you want - I know I do ! I guess I never learned that lesson of 'you just gotta do what your told whether you like it or not 'cause that is life!' So glad for that! Well said, Irena.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
Thanks Aquinas! Actually, there is a great podcast on this issue and how bad it is and how it results in gifted underachievement. It's here: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/colorado-gifted/id650064362?mt=2Well worth the listen - he talks about a few things but he does talk about giving these kids some control in their education and not taking control "away in a purposeless way" form these kids. It's a great podcast!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
While I agree with most everyone said above about the school I do have one question. Why is it a 7 year olds decision if he doesn't wants to go on a field trip? Why should I pay for something that my son doesn't want to do? Because it's about power! You must exert your power regardless of how meaningless! You must take choice and control away from your kid in any way possible! How else will he learn to blindly obey no matter what!?!? (in case it's not obvious, completely joking and being sarcastic here) Personally, kids need a sense of control and of choice - I give it when I can (obviously within reason) I try not to take away control in a purposeless way because, really, the kid in such a situation will just tune out anyway. That is just my personal parenting philosophy and that's why my 7 year old (now 8) usually got a choice on field trips... it works really well for us. It seems especially important for my gifted kiddo. And we have a winner! Irena you win the prize for guessing what the issue is. (And really, if I had a way to give you a prize, I would.) It is a big power/control trip. DH and I were at an event at school with other little ones in tow. Principal Cuddly Crocodile approached me because she was "very concerned" that DS7 is not going on the field trip. I thanked her for her thorough follow thru and her attention to this. But I simply repeated the reasons that DS has already told her about not wanting to go on the trip. I then asked her, what's all the kerfuffle about? Are they going to the Jim Jones Nature Center? (Blank stare.) She cited several reasons why children "must" go on field trips: wonderful educational opportunities, a child could miss out on thrilling and educational discussions regarding the trip in the days following, a child will miss out on irreplaceable social exchanges that can only occur on a long field trip bus ride. When I explained that he was ok with all of that and so were we, we got to the root of it: "If you refuse to go on the trip, other parents will think it's ok to do the same. We don't want you to set a precedent that will cause other parents to think that they can pick and choose the educational opportunities that the school offers. We are experienced professionals. We know what are great opportunities for children." Then the principal approached DH (Mr. Terse - he doesn't use any more words than he ever has to use. He is linguistically efficient.) He just stated, "I find you and your staff to be offensive. I will not discuss the matter any further. Thank you." So, once DH and I were done playing good cop/bad cop we mingled with other families at this event (while our toddlers are bouncing around all over the place). Turns out this is business as usual for the principal and office staff regarding field trips. Eh - I should have known. The control and not wanting to set a precedent is the same excuse we got for not accelerating and not homeschooling.
Last edited by somewhereonearth; 06/11/14 01:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
I never heard that sit wait and listen before but maybe that's me. I guess I must be the only one that lives in an area where schools are good. My comment really had nothing to do with schools. No your comment had nothing to do with schools. Rather, your comment was a snide remark on the OP's parenting and it implied that any decent sane parent would never take their 7 year old's feelings on the issue into consideration (or any issue apparently!) Yeah, I noticed. As you can see, many of us do not share this philosophy and we have pretty great kids so... I guess we agree to disagree on the issue and move on as, clearly , the OP is standing by her decision to honor her child's feelings on the matter whether you think it is purely a "parental" decision or not. And, quite honestly, in life, a lot of times you do get what you want - I know I do ! I guess I never learned that lesson of 'you just gotta do what your told whether you like it or not 'cause that is life!' So glad for that! I think nicoledad is making a legitimate general point about the parental role in decision making, it's just that it's a non-issue in this case, as parent and child are in total agreement about this particular situation. Here's an example where there'd be a real issue. If my child thought a teacher was assigning pointless busywork, then I'd expect my child to let me know. I would decide if I agreed. If so I would advocate with them to the teacher to be excused from the pointless busywork. If I disagreed, I would expect them to do the work. I would not say they should just unilaterally refuse to do it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498 |
Somewhere, sheesh.
Is this a private school or public? This seems unusual if it's a public, but some private schools do assume they can control their "culture" and "product" to a pretty great extent.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
[Yesterday] Maybe if they make it optional for anyone, then they have to make it optional for everyone, and they don't want to do that for some reason. [Today] When I explained that he was ok with all of that and so were we, we got to the root of it: "If you refuse to go on the trip, other parents will think it's ok to do the same. We don't want you to set a precedent that will cause other parents to think that they can pick and choose the educational opportunities that the school offers. We are experienced professionals. We know what are great opportunities for children." Yay! I win! Where's my prize?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
If this school is so bad, why send him their period?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
Somewhereonearth, as an aside, I think our husbands would get along. DH, a lawyer, goes from polite and terse to an ungodly firestorm of argument-decimating verbal ripostes in the blink of an eye. People think I'm the bad cop until they meet his game face. He leaves no survivors.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
If this school is so bad, why send him their period? Are you still here?!
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
If this school is so bad, why send him their period? Are you still here?! LOL, I thought the same thing!
Last edited by Irena; 06/11/14 02:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,808
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,808 |
Then the principal approached DH (Mr. Terse - he doesn't use any more words than he ever has to use. He is linguistically efficient.) He just stated, "I find you and your staff to be offensive. I will not discuss the matter any further. Thank you." I hate it when the principal doesn't take your word for it and tries to undermine you by going to the male figure in the family. Hello! Gotta tell you though - LOVED your DH's response.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
nicoledad, thanks for your input in this discussion. We generally allow DS7 to make all decisions in our house. He rules the roost. We find that things work better that way.
Just kidding. We actually did the school-knows-best-so-do-what-they-say-and-effectively-sit-down-and-shut-up (for a couple of months). What we found was that the "professionals" actually didn't have a clue how to educate this child. This, in and of itself, would have been ok if they had just said, "we don't know what we're dealing with - let's figure out how to meet your son's needs." What ended up happening is that staff said all sorts of things, made a lot of promises - in writing - and then truly ignored all of the promises. They literally left my son sitting and waiting - for months - for accommodations that they had PROMISED him and me. When I did my investigation to try to figure out why my super duper social and relatively compliant son was refusing to go to school, I found that he was an anxious child at school who was being ignored. (And yes, I have had staff repeat to me, "your son needs to learn to not ask questions and to sit down and do what he's told." What he was doing before we began partial homeschooling, was filling out classroom worksheets with variations of "I don't know." The attitude was clearly out of a prior decade - maybe the 1950s. Yet the teachers were mostly born in the 1980s. I digress.)
When I brought in my son's IQ scores and report and illustrated that he was at least 4 SD out to the right of that bell curve, I got the shrug. I was assured that the Very Experienced Professionals would take of things. So, to say that I have a major trust problem with the staff of this school would be a huge understatement.
Not that I need to justify anything to anyone here, but I think it may be useful to those who post and read here. When my son declared that he didn't want to go on this trip, I was surprised. He typically likes a fun day with friends on the bus doing whatever they are doing. He appears to have outgrown that. We had a long discussion about his thoughts about the trip and what he thought would be a suitable replacement for that day. It all sounded good to me. In fact, I was quite proud of how he thought out activities for the day. He was not trying to evade something moderately unpleasant. He was simply thinking practically, actually.
As far as money, it's not an big issue. But the trip is to a place to which we are already members. The school doesn't allow a family to use their membership cards on field trips ("too confusing for the teachers"). But again - why should I waste my money (any amount of it) for something that doesn't appear to have much value for me or my child?
My child has plenty of growth and resilience opportunities as a result of being put in frustrating situations (has anyone read, The Blessing of a Skinned Knee?). An elementary school field trip to me is a bit like a friend's birthday party at that age. Go if you want to go, don't go if you don't want to go.
Last edited by somewhereonearth; 06/11/14 02:08 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
If this school is so bad, why send him their period? They're doing partial homeschooling (which I'm sure is a pretty rare opportunity). They get to pick and choose what they want from the school, so there're some advantages that make it worth putting up with some of the weirdness, I guess. OP can clarify.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
Principal Cuddly Crocodile approached me because she was "very concerned" that DS7 is not going on the field trip. I thanked her for her thorough follow thru and her attention to this. But I simply repeated the reasons that DS has already told her about not wanting to go on the trip. I then asked her, what's all the kerfuffle about? Are they going to the Jim Jones Nature Center? (Blank stare.) ...
Then the principal approached DH (Mr. Terse - he doesn't use any more words than he ever has to use. He is linguistically efficient.) He just stated, "I find you and your staff to be offensive. I will not discuss the matter any further. Thank you." Oh my gosh, I am dying laughing! The Jim jones Nature Center! (Loved HK's Kool Aid comment ealier too - laughed so much ) Where are the parents like you at my DS's school!?!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
[Yesterday] Maybe if they make it optional for anyone, then they have to make it optional for everyone, and they don't want to do that for some reason. [Today] When I explained that he was ok with all of that and so were we, we got to the root of it: "If you refuse to go on the trip, other parents will think it's ok to do the same. We don't want you to set a precedent that will cause other parents to think that they can pick and choose the educational opportunities that the school offers. We are experienced professionals. We know what are great opportunities for children." Yay! I win! Where's my prize? 22B, yes you win a prize too! I was searching back in the posts because I didn't remember who had made your comment.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
If this school is so bad, why send him their period? Are you still here?! LOL, I thought the same thing! PM'd you!
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
I agree with the rare opportunity comment. I am certainly not up on any laws regarding partial homeschooling but couldn't that be taken away?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6 |
If a student here has a certain number of unexcused absences, like 10 or 14, or tardies (if a child is even one minute late they mark it as a tardy) the school calls CPS and there is a truancy case. I think once a kid hits 14 absences, they have to bring in doctor's notes. Parents have access to an online acct. and I was looking at DS's page yesterday, and they have documented every absence and the reason for it (sick, medical appt., unexcused, etc). There is even a graph showing the percentage of sick days vs. unexcused, etc.
I wonder if this could have to do with that....they are trying to make a case that there are too many unexcused absences? I don't know, just thought I'd throw that out there
. Are you serious? That is crazy. Here it would take a lot more than that (like 6 months non attendance) to get a truancy case taken though if my child were late to school every day the school social worker might get involved. I know kids who habitually missed 30+ days of school each year, and no truancy case was generated, despite this wording in the law: "A student shall be considered habitually absent or habitually tardy when either condition continues to exist after all reasonable efforts by any school personnel, truancy officer, or other law enforcement personnel have failed to correct the condition after the fifth unexcused absence or fifth unexcused occurrence of being tardy within any school semester." Policy and practice don't often match. A possible explanation for much weirdness by school personnel is that they have school improvement or school wide professional development goals which involve meeting some arbitrary benchmark for attendance, on-time attendance, parent participation, communicating, outreach to parents, school-community partnerships, etc. It's the end if the school year, and they're running out of time to meet their goals, which might be tied to merit pay for the principal or teachers union members, avoiding takeover by the state, etc.
...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 710
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 710 |
if it's not compulsory and it's not a life changing event I'd definitely take my child's feelings and thoughts into consideration. That includes my 7 year old, my 5 year old and even my 3 year old. In fact, even with life changing events I'd be likely to ask them and consider that into the mix too.
Flip if I had left Aiden at the K level in the gifted school he was at before we pulled him out I'm sure by now my marriage would be over, Aiden and I would both be on medication and he on suicide watch. He was 5 and my only regret about listening to him was that I didn't listen sooner - like an entire year sooner! We could have skipped so much anguish, angst and emotional and psychological turmoil. All just by asking what he wanted. *sigh*
We homeschool/unschool now and my older two boys get to choose their own goals, and set their own work schedules. They suggest/veto project and outing suggestions and they definitely chose their own sports and activity options.
Mom to 3 gorgeous boys: Aiden (8), Nathan (7) and Dylan (4)
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
I wasn't kidding about the calls to CPS. I know of 2 families where CPS got involved. One of them involved a single mom who had a first grader and twin infants. She was sometimes a couple minutes late with drop-off because of juggling all the kids by herself, and once it got to about 15 tardies, CPS actually came to the school and there was a meeting. One day my kids arrived at school literally seconds (maybe 5 seconds?) after the bell rang. The reason they were late was because someone locked the back door earlier than usual, so they had to walk around the building. The kids were sent to the office and marked tardy, and it's in the records.
I've become paranoid and if I can't get my kids out the door (with DD's ADHD and DS's organizational impairments this is often difficult), I start to panic a bit, thinking about mounting tardies. Sometimes they are marked tardy when I know I dropped them off before the bell rang. Parents aren't allowed into the school (unless they go to the office and sign in with ID), so if my kids get distracted or wander, they are marked tardy, and then I could get reported to CPS.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 761 |
Illinois has a very strict policy on absences too. If I'm not mistaken, it's first 5 or 6 absences and you get a warning letter and once you hit 10 (or is it 9?) ... and that's total for BOTH semesters, the school is supposed to notify the truancy office and you're being watched like a hawk and from then on have to bring doctor's notes and any non-health related absence has to be approved by the school administrator. DS5.10 when he was still enrolled had major absences. He'd go to school for couple days, get sick for a week, then school for couple days, then sick again. Knowing the policy and how much he'd get sick, I had it written in his emergency medical plan (which was mainly to cover his allergy but we included this too) that it was expected he would be sick often and that the school would NOT require us to produce any doctor notes (he tends to catch even more bugs when we visit doctor offices) to not compromise his immunity even further and our doctor signed off on it and I had the school sign off on it before he even started attending. And of course, two or three weeks after the school started (this was last fall), we got the warning letter in the mail, so I marched in, with a copy of our emergency health plan, asked to talk to the principal, and made him aware of the agreement we had that no action would be taken and I have to say that they did follow it from then on. By Thanksgiving when we pulled him out to homeschool, he had about 25 absences I think? ... and totally off topic, but hes not been sick ONCE since we pulled him out in November! He had sniffles for about 2 days but no high fevers, frequent trips to the ER, anything like that. So homeschooling clearly has many more advantages aside to tailored education plans
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363 |
Our school district (or possibly our state) is also very strict about total # of absences and calling CPS.
FWIW, the principal's reason is sounding a lot like what happened with friends or our family who were part-time homeschooling in elementary - the school really didn't *want* them part-time homeschooling, and eventually pressured them into having to either enroll full-time or withdraw and homeschool full-time. When the school was putting pressure on the family to make their decision, they used reasons such as this - not being available to fully participate socially (from the school's point of view). Perhaps the principal's only concern is floodgates opening with lots of other parents opting their kids out of field trips, but I'm wary that there might be something more behind it in terms of finding excuses for why part-time homeschooling doesn't work. If you're *not* getting that vibe and the school is completely behind your decision and happy with it, then totally ignore this reply!
Best wishes,
polarbear
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6 |
One of the concerns schools have about part-time homeschooling (and this even applies to private schools) is that they will be held accountable for the results of instruction that is largely out of their control. It is easy to view this as controlling behavior in the sense of infringing on privacy rights, but you also have to think about it from the standpoint of consequences that the school and school personnel take for situations over which they have no influence. Any student who is on the books in the state count as being enrolled at a school affects their attendance, graduation, and state testing figures, which feed into their school and district performance figures, which affect Race to the Top funds, state receivership/supervision status of the district, NCLB accountability numbers, etc. Every public school administrator I know (and a few private school admins, too) has at least one directly-observed horror story about a homeschooled student who was not receiving adequate instruction, or was nominally homeschooled as a cover for some truly neglectful/abusive family situation. Granted, there is a fair amount of selection bias, as the successful homeschooling families are probably less likely to wash back up on the public school shores than the poorly-homeschooling families. But the point is, their anecdotal experience causes them to fear that a student being educated outside of their own (presumably) watchful eyes is not going to learn, and then the school will be punished for it when mandated testing time rolls around.
I have had more than one administrator say to me in surprise, "You homeschool? But you're so normal!" (Little do they know!)
...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Principal Cuddly Crocodile approached me because she was "very concerned" that DS7 is not going on the field trip. I thanked her for her thorough follow thru and her attention to this. But I simply repeated the reasons that DS has already told her about not wanting to go on the trip. I then asked her, what's all the kerfuffle about? Are they going to the Jim Jones Nature Center? (Blank stare.) ...
Then the principal approached DH (Mr. Terse - he doesn't use any more words than he ever has to use. He is linguistically efficient.) He just stated, "I find you and your staff to be offensive. I will not discuss the matter any further. Thank you." Oh my gosh, I am dying laughing! The Jim jones Nature Center! (Loved HK's Kool Aid comment ealier too - laughed so much ) Where are the parents like you at my DS's school!?! :-)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Somewhereonearth, as an aside, I think our husbands would get along. DH, a lawyer, goes from polite and terse to an ungodly firestorm of argument-decimating verbal ripostes in the blink of an eye. People think I'm the bad cop until they meet his game face. He leaves no survivors. Sounds like they would be best buddies. Of course, my DH being so terse, wouldn't have too much to say to your husband, or to anyone else.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Somewhere, sheesh.
Is this a private school or public? This seems unusual if it's a public, but some private schools do assume they can control their "culture" and "product" to a pretty great extent. Charter school. Non profit with founders who are, honestly, rather cultish.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
If this school is so bad, why send him their period? It actually works well for DS. This school is, hands down, the best public school in the area. There are some things that I quite like about the school apart from the ill fitting academics. And having worked in public and private schools for a long time, I find this behavior to be odd, but not so odd. Public schools have a lot of incompetent people working in them. I knew that going in to the game. I think the specials that are offered at this school are good. The student population at the school is perfect for us - extremely diverse with a very large immigrant population. I like my DS hanging out with a lot of the kids from his school. Of course this can all change on a dime.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Our school district (or possibly our state) is also very strict about total # of absences and calling CPS.
FWIW, the principal's reason is sounding a lot like what happened with friends or our family who were part-time homeschooling in elementary - the school really didn't *want* them part-time homeschooling, and eventually pressured them into having to either enroll full-time or withdraw and homeschool full-time. When the school was putting pressure on the family to make their decision, they used reasons such as this - not being available to fully participate socially (from the school's point of view). Perhaps the principal's only concern is floodgates opening with lots of other parents opting their kids out of field trips, but I'm wary that there might be something more behind it in terms of finding excuses for why part-time homeschooling doesn't work. If you're *not* getting that vibe and the school is completely behind your decision and happy with it, then totally ignore this reply!
Best wishes,
polarbear Oh sure, the school has never really liked that we are doing the partial homeschooling. But after speaking with other parents, I am hearing that this field trip issue is universal. It is apparently standard operating procedure for the school to basically harass any family who declares that their child will not be attending a field trip.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
Somewhereonearth, as an aside, I think our husbands would get along. DH, a lawyer, goes from polite and terse to an ungodly firestorm of argument-decimating verbal ripostes in the blink of an eye. People think I'm the bad cop until they meet his game face. He leaves no survivors. Sounds like they would be best buddies. Of course, my DH being so terse, wouldn't have too much to say to your husband, or to anyone else. They could read the newspaper in a parallel, amicable silence. I think that's my husband's dream friendship. Double points if his favourite columnist were his silent friend, haha!
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Somewhereonearth, as an aside, I think our husbands would get along. DH, a lawyer, goes from polite and terse to an ungodly firestorm of argument-decimating verbal ripostes in the blink of an eye. People think I'm the bad cop until they meet his game face. He leaves no survivors. Sounds like they would be best buddies. Of course, my DH being so terse, wouldn't have too much to say to your husband, or to anyone else. I can fill in for terse. My verbosity makes up for it, but I do know how to be very very quiet and nice-seeming until I'm crossed. I regularly give school staffers and administrators a sense of cognitive dissonance sufficient to give them mental whiplash, actually. Are you good cop? Or bad cop? they wonder... YES. I am.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
[Yesterday] Maybe if they make it optional for anyone, then they have to make it optional for everyone, and they don't want to do that for some reason. [Today] When I explained that he was ok with all of that and so were we, we got to the root of it: "If you refuse to go on the trip, other parents will think it's ok to do the same. We don't want you to set a precedent that will cause other parents to think that they can pick and choose the educational opportunities that the school offers. We are experienced professionals. We know what are great opportunities for children." Yay! I win! Where's my prize? 22B, yes you win a prize too! I was searching back in the posts because I didn't remember who had made your comment. Here's a whole PITCHER of Kool-aid.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
[Yesterday] Maybe if they make it optional for anyone, then they have to make it optional for everyone, and they don't want to do that for some reason. [Today] When I explained that he was ok with all of that and so were we, we got to the root of it: "If you refuse to go on the trip, other parents will think it's ok to do the same. We don't want you to set a precedent that will cause other parents to think that they can pick and choose the educational opportunities that the school offers. We are experienced professionals. We know what are great opportunities for children." Yay! I win! Where's my prize? 22B, yes you win a prize too! I was searching back in the posts because I didn't remember who had made your comment. Here's a whole PITCHER of Kool-aid. You have me laughing!
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
[Yesterday] Maybe if they make it optional for anyone, then they have to make it optional for everyone, and they don't want to do that for some reason. [Today] When I explained that he was ok with all of that and so were we, we got to the root of it: "If you refuse to go on the trip, other parents will think it's ok to do the same. We don't want you to set a precedent that will cause other parents to think that they can pick and choose the educational opportunities that the school offers. We are experienced professionals. We know what are great opportunities for children." Yay! I win! Where's my prize? 22B, yes you win a prize too! I was searching back in the posts because I didn't remember who had made your comment. Here's a whole PITCHER of Kool-aid. Oh HK, how could have missed you?! You definitely get a prize too! And you also get a prize for being one of the first people on the site - maybe THE first person - to help me out when I first arrived here. As soon as I see your avatar, I think, "this will be a wise, helpful and peaceful response. I better read it!" Love to you all here! I honestly could not make it through this journey without you. Thanks so much!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222 |
I only would have asked my kids what they wanted to do if I thought the field trip was a dumb waste of time and didnt feel like paying for it, but if they wanted to go to spend time with friends outside the classroom, I would let them go. If I thought the field trip was inappropriate or I was uncomfortable with it, then the only discussion would be me explaining why I thought so, to the level that it made sense to explain it.
I would communicate that I am keeping the child home, just in case that is the reason for their inordinate interest.
If their interest is something else, then I would dig in my heels more. I would have signed the permission slip but stayed home only after a day or two of them asking. After that, its clear that you are hostile to the idea and you will have to fight the good fight now or later. It may as well be now.
Last edited by Chana; 06/12/14 05:55 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
We don't want you to set a precedent that will cause other parents to think that they can pick and choose the educational opportunities that the school offers. Hello, cognitive dissonance. It's like they don't know what a permission slip does.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Right. That's not Kool-aid. It's-- medicinal.
Like magic, almost. No more cognitive dissonance!
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
A possible explanation for much weirdness by school personnel is that they have school improvement or school wide professional development goals which involve meeting some arbitrary benchmark for attendance, on-time attendance, parent participation, communicating, outreach to parents, school-community partnerships, etc. It's the end if the school year, and they're running out of time to meet their goals, which might be tied to merit pay for the principal or teachers union members, avoiding takeover by the state, etc. Yeah. Personally, I kinda still think it's something like this. They don't want to tell you, but some weird numbers game. Or, control freak city. I have a theory that charter school brass tend to be like this. Micromanaging, control, control. They were at the charter we had DD at.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
We have had some good teachers and administrators in our day, but I think one thing that sometimes happens is that the daily carrot/stick behavior-management aspects of teaching seep into the bones of school personnel and they get very weird with the power games. I see this desire to win and to be alpha. Who cares if the kid doesn't go on the field trip? (I also see MYSELF--the way I get sometimes when it feels like my kids are getting the better of me at every turn, and I start to turn into a petty dictator trying to get the upper hand and prove I'm in charge here. It's not a nice look.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 710
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 710 |
We have had some good teachers and administrators in our day, but I think one thing that sometimes happens is that the daily carrot/stick behavior-management aspects of teaching seep into the bones of school personnel and they get very weird with the power games. I see this desire to win and to be alpha. Who cares if the kid doesn't go on the field trip? (I also see MYSELF--the way I get sometimes when it feels like my kids are getting the better of me at every turn, and I start to turn into a petty dictator trying to get the upper hand and prove I'm in charge here. It's not a nice look.) YES! I always get upset with myself when I recognise I'm getting to that point. Luckily I can stop, breathe and change direction. Not sure if the slow-turning wheels of "corporate culture" that assimilate into some schools would allow for the same recognition and self-adjustment. It's also one of the reasons why I am more and more wary of things that reward "playing the game" with gold stars/A symbols/insert carrot of choice here
Mom to 3 gorgeous boys: Aiden (8), Nathan (7) and Dylan (4)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6 |
A possible explanation for much weirdness by school personnel is that they have school improvement or school wide professional development goals which involve meeting some arbitrary benchmark for attendance, on-time attendance, parent participation, communicating, outreach to parents, school-community partnerships, etc. It's the end if the school year, and they're running out of time to meet their goals, which might be tied to merit pay for the principal or teachers union members, avoiding takeover by the state, etc. Yeah. Personally, I kinda still think it's something like this. They don't want to tell you, but some weird numbers game. Or, control freak city. I have a theory that charter school brass tend to be like this. Micromanaging, control, control. They were at the charter we had DD at. That's because charter schools are in danger of having their charters ripped away every couple of years, so they live in a constant state of fear. Also, they often have a cultish emotional commitment to whatever their special little approach is. Down to the last detail. (Not knocking all charters; I think competition and experimentation in education is a good thing--way better than monolithic bureaucracy. But charters also attract visionaries and fanatics, on the one hand, and profit-driven edubusinesses on the other hand.)
...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035 |
We have had some good teachers and administrators in our day, but I think one thing that sometimes happens is that the daily carrot/stick behavior-management aspects of teaching seep into the bones of school personnel and they get very weird with the power games. I see this desire to win and to be alpha. Who cares if the kid doesn't go on the field trip? (I also see MYSELF--the way I get sometimes when it feels like my kids are getting the better of me at every turn, and I start to turn into a petty dictator trying to get the upper hand and prove I'm in charge here. It's not a nice look.) Well you care. I am not sure this is a hill worth dying on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035 |
I wasn't kidding about the calls to CPS. I know of 2 families where CPS got involved. One of them involved a single mom who had a first grader and twin infants. She was sometimes a couple minutes late with drop-off because of juggling all the kids by herself, and once it got to about 15 tardies, CPS actually came to the school and there was a meeting. One day my kids arrived at school literally seconds (maybe 5 seconds?) after the bell rang. The reason they were late was because someone locked the back door earlier than usual, so they had to walk around the building. The kids were sent to the office and marked tardy, and it's in the records.
I've become paranoid and if I can't get my kids out the door (with DD's ADHD and DS's organizational impairments this is often difficult), I start to panic a bit, thinking about mounting tardies. Sometimes they are marked tardy when I know I dropped them off before the bell rang. Parents aren't allowed into the school (unless they go to the office and sign in with ID), so if my kids get distracted or wander, they are marked tardy, and then I could get reported to CPS. Parents aren't allowed in the school? I can't imagine that and don't want too. Obviously walking into classrooms and disrupting classes isn't OK but otherwise our school has a open door policy. (just NZ PS).
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
Parents can be in the school but they have to sign in at the office w/ a photo ID. So parents do not walk their kids into the building in the morning (even kindergartners), they are dropped off at the door or in carpool, then the kids make their own way to their classrooms. If a kid shows up to class late, the teacher sends them to the office and they are marked tardy. Since my kids tend to get distracted, or it takes them forever to take their coats and backpacks off, they don't necessarily show up to class on time. Parents can eat lunch with their kids (as long as they sign in) but no one is really allowed to volunteer for grades 2+, unless it's for a field trip or special event. For K-1 the teacher will put you on a volunteer schedule maybe twice per month if you want to come in. Otherwise there are no parents in the building.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 157
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 157 |
Explain on an excused absence form why that field trip does not work for your gifted child.
Prepare an alternative homeschool day - maybe along whatever theme the school is trying to teach on that particular fieldtrip or what works for your family and your child instead.
This is a perfect example of when school districts can demonstrate understanding of gifted people and allow the gifted family to differentiate to the student's benefit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739 |
Parents can be in the school but they have to sign in at the office w/ a photo ID. So parents do not walk their kids into the building in the morning (even kindergartners), they are dropped off at the door or in carpool, then the kids make their own way to their classrooms. If a kid shows up to class late, the teacher sends them to the office and they are marked tardy. Since my kids tend to get distracted, or it takes them forever to take their coats and backpacks off, they don't necessarily show up to class on time. Parents can eat lunch with their kids (as long as they sign in) but no one is really allowed to volunteer for grades 2+, unless it's for a field trip or special event. For K-1 the teacher will put you on a volunteer schedule maybe twice per month if you want to come in. Otherwise there are no parents in the building. What Blackcat reports is WAY more access than parents were allowed at the public DD attended for 1st and 2nd. No parent volunteers, no eating lunch, no going past the office. Period. You could only enter the front door if you called in advance to advise that you were coming. Last year DD had a surgical procedure on her face and asked me to walk her to her classroom because she had a bandage on her face and was uncomfortable about how she would be received by the other kids. Nope, not allowed. Assigned to make a special treat for the class exploration of holidays around the world? Dropped it at the office and they called the classroom only after DH and I left the building so someone could come pick it up and bring it down the hall. Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy huh?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363 |
Parents can be in the school but they have to sign in at the office w/ a photo ID. So parents do not walk their kids into the building in the morning (even kindergartners), they are dropped off at the door or in carpool, then the kids make their own way to their classrooms. If a kid shows up to class late, the teacher sends them to the office and they are marked tardy. Since my kids tend to get distracted, or it takes them forever to take their coats and backpacks off, they don't necessarily show up to class on time. Parents can eat lunch with their kids (as long as they sign in) but no one is really allowed to volunteer for grades 2+, unless it's for a field trip or special event. For K-1 the teacher will put you on a volunteer schedule maybe twice per month if you want to come in. Otherwise there are no parents in the building. What Blackcat reports is WAY more access than parents were allowed at the public DD attended for 1st and 2nd. No parent volunteers, no eating lunch, no going past the office. Period. You could only enter the front door if you called in advance to advise that you were coming. Last year DD had a surgical procedure on her face and asked me to walk her to her classroom because she had a bandage on her face and was uncomfortable about how she would be received by the other kids. Nope, not allowed. Assigned to make a special treat for the class exploration of holidays around the world? Dropped it at the office and they called the classroom only after DH and I left the building so someone could come pick it up and bring it down the hall. Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy huh? Wow - both of these just make me feel sad! Our schools are so very different from that - I hope that all that uber-protectiveness is serving a good purpose. or it takes them forever to take their coats and backpacks off, they don't necessarily show up to class on time. My DCD-ds moves so slowly, he was often *inside* his classroom (because that's where the cubbies were) in elementary school and was still marked tardy because he'd still be at his cubby taking off his coat and boots instead of having made it to his desk by the time the teacher took attendance. We're not talking a huge classroom at all... but for some reason his teacher couldn't see him standing next to his cubby! polarbear
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498 |
My DCD-ds moves so slowly, he was often *inside* his classroom (because that's where the cubbies were) in elementary school and was still marked tardy because he'd still be at his cubby taking off his coat and boots instead of having made it to his desk by the time the teacher took attendance. We're not talking a huge classroom at all... but for some reason his teacher couldn't see him standing next to his cubby! Must have been wearing his invisibility cloak at the time. Sigh.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489 |
Wow. Pemberley. That school seems very locked down, I would have a problem with that. The elementary schools my kids attended wanted and encouraged parents volunteers. The school my DD attended K-8 and my son K-3rd was really encouraging of parents in the classroom. You HAD to sign in, and it was at teacher discretion/invitation. And there were certain times like during the state testing that no parents volunteers were allowed in the school. But mostly the school was really open, and it allowed me to observe my kids in class without being obvious about it. Once they hit 6th grade, the schools didn't want volunteers IN the classrooms, but there was still plenty to do. I spend a year working in the copy room at my son's junior high. And I still help a the PTA run student store at the High School.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739 |
Those of you who were here for the last 2 years probably remember my descriptions of the horrible principal at that school. Just as was discussed up thread it was all about control. Oppressive, controlling and incompetent. She was finally removed at the end of last year (who knows - maybe my Dept. of Ed complaint could have had a little something to do with that...) and I have been told the replacement is as opposite as possible. It will take a while to remove all the toxic culture she left behind but many families are breathing a sigh of relief.
And sadly no it didn't really serve any purpose except to feed this horrible woman's need for control. Every article I have read about creating a positive school culture talks about the importance of an open environment and treating parents as partners in their children's educations. I guess that's the most common denominator here among parents who are unhappy with their child's school situation. If parents and kids feel disrespected - or worse like the enemy - it's not surprising animosity develops and our outside the box kids don't get their needs met.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6 |
All visitors to our building have to have their driver's licenses scanned on entry, and it pulls up active warrants and restrictions. And yes, that does seem awfully police state--but then again, we've identified and turned away a few people who were not supposed to be around children that way...
...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,478
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,478 |
At our Title 1 school with appropriate id scanning, parents have very free access to the school and classrooms. It's part of the rules required for the funding.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
At our Title 1 school with appropriate id scanning, parents have very free access to the school and classrooms. It's part of the rules required for the funding. Interesting. It's a Title 1 school that I'm talking about, where parents aren't really in the classroom (at least for grade 2+). I don't think they would ever refuse to allow a parent in, but the parent would pretty much have to insist. It was pretty obvious DS's 1st grade teacher didn't want volunteers. I told her I could volunteer once per week so she put me on a schedule 1-2 times per month. Parents wouldn't show up at other times, when they weren't scheduled, because then they would look/feel pushy. After about 3 months she stopped sending out the schedule altogether (not just to me, but to all the parents). So the overall message that parents get is that they aren't really welcome or wanted.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,478
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,478 |
The FAQ on parental involvement is pretty informative: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/parentinvguid.docE-5.Is volunteering in a child’s classroom an activity in which parents can engage to help share the responsibility for student learning?
Yes. Volunteering and observing in their child’s classroom is an important activity for parents’ shared responsibility for high student academic achievement and is also one that helps both the school and parents build and develop a partnership to help children achieve the State’s high standards. Section 1118(d)(1), ESEA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Clearly some administrators do not have enough additional time to devote to actually reading for professional development.
They are very busy controlling things.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
My children's school is Title 1 and operates very much like blackcat's. I don't believe licenses are actually scanned, but I'm not sure. They do print out a badge with a photo of your DL. This went into place after Sandy Hook. I am not aware of parents volunteering in the classrooms except for special events.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
I believe all schools in our district now have the license/ID badge/locked-door policy. I don't like it and find it depressing, like my children are in jail. But I thought it had become common.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035 |
Some of the day care centre here have swipe cards and entrances where you have to go past a receptionist to get it. I removed my child to a less prison-like environment when a place came up.
To me the ability of parents to wander in and out of the school at will keeps the teachers honest. The school my sons go to only got a proper fence with gates that shut at the end of last year but the only gate that is locked it the one that opens on to a fairly busy road (busy for where we are not a 6 lane highway). I guess if I had a violent ex or something (mad people with guns) I might want more security but they actually manage ex husbands quite well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 29
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 29 |
Ours has locked entrances with video cameras, wait to be identified and buzzed in, proceed straight to the office to sign in. No ID scans, though. I believe that's pretty standard around here, sadly. Parents volunteer daily at dropoff, lunch, and library but are rarely allowed into the classroom.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 517
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 517 |
Sooooo lucky in NZ to have kids not stress about being safe, can't imagine not being able to walk wee one to her class when she starts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032 |
All visitors to our building have to have their driver's licenses scanned on entry, and it pulls up active warrants and restrictions. And yes, that does seem awfully police state--but then again, we've identified and turned away a few people who were not supposed to be around children that way... I would instantly turn into my mother for that one. I have to have a driver's license to enter a school that my taxes pay for, to see my child's classroom? What if I don't have a driver's license? No, how I got here is none of your business. Driver's licenses are for driving, not for visiting school classrooms, not for renting videos (that's the one my mother went ballistic about, many years ago). And I'll be darned if you're going to keep me out of my kid's classroom for not showing you a driver's license. /rant off
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 157
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 157 |
Try not to figure it out. For our brains, it will only give you angst. I literally grit my teeth, remember what I had to get through. Then, imagine your child finally at a worthwhile university with respected programs with noise-guards on ears actually studying in a library and learning something.
It is like an obstacle course, waiting for all of the non-intellectuals to leave and then you are left with the people who have brains like yours.
It is painful having to relive it as a gifted parent raising a gifted child. The schools have no idea.
It is possible that someone with an average IQ just cannot understand higher IQ people. I now understand why I keep hearing about Google's interview / screening test. Good for them.
The really high sensitivity, highly intelligent parents are shocked at what passes for education. Would not believe it if we had not experienced it ourselves.
Run to another school. This one will be more of the same and it is just not worth speaking about because they are not listening.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
The thing that really got on my nerves about the driver's license was that they asked parents to get it out even though they know full well who you are, if you have had kids in the school for a while. They make you get it out and they don't even look at it, because it's already obvious who you are. It's ridiculous, like showing your next door neighbor identification. They don't scan it, they are just supposed to be verifying that the name on the ID matches up with the name on the sign-in sheet, but no one looks at the sign-in sheet anyway. I'm really not sure what the point even is. The school loses kids regularly so all of the locked doors to keep people out don't actually keep the kids safe. I've heard of 3 kindergarten-first grade kids just in the last year who left the building at some point after they were dropped off, and were wandering around school grounds or walked home when they were supposed to be at school. If a little kid is outside in 0 degree temps and all of the school doors are locked so they can't get in, that poses a greater threat than worrying about someone abducting them from the school, or a school shooter IMO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032 |
The thing that really got on my nerves about the driver's license was that they asked parents to get it out even though they know full well who you are, if you have had kids in the school for a while. They make you get it out and they don't even look at it, because it's already obvious who you are. Reminds me of a scene a few years ago at the polling place in my tiny little town. Old couple, lady with the contents of her purse scattered on the table, searching for some form of ID so she could vote, man helping her and suggesting they should go home and get something to bring back -- and the election judge says, "Ethel, if you could even find a utility bill with your name on it, we could use that for your ID."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2 |
I would instantly turn into my mother for that one. I have to have a driver's license to enter a school that my taxes pay for, to see my child's classroom? What if I don't have a driver's license? No, how I got here is none of your business. Driver's licenses are for driving, not for visiting school classrooms, not for renting videos (that's the one my mother went ballistic about, many years ago). And I'll be darned if you're going to keep me out of my kid's classroom for not showing you a driver's license. People who don't drive can get free state-issued ID. It's not absurd to ask adults entering a school to show ID. Video stores may have found that adults who are responsible enough to maintain a driver's license are more likely to return videos or at least be more easily tracked if they don't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Free?
HA. I hardly think so. And there may be other barriers, as well.
It is actually just as challenging (monetarily, and in terms of provided documents) to obtain an official state-issued ID around here as it is to obtain a learner's permit from the DMV. And the DMV is the only source for this ID.
It took us four trips and sending for out-of-state documents ($$$!! and five weeks of waiting!) for my DD11 to obtain such identification. It took ME nearly that long to obtain what I needed in order to get a renewal of my license post-Patriot Act.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
I agree with everything you said. I understand it can be frustrating but this is 2014 not 1984. Child molesters pay taxes too so do they get the right to see the classroom. Apparently not everyone would rather be safe than sorry.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2 |
Free? HA. I hardly think so. And there may be other barriers, as well. OK, I see it's not free in MA either -- the cost is $25.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
I agree with everything you said. I understand it can be frustrating but this is 2014 not 1984. Child molesters pay taxes too so do they get the right to see the classroom. Apparently not everyone would rather be safe than sorry. So, the child molesters are going to saunter into the classroom and start molesting kids right there in front of everyone? Or they'll just ask one of the kids to accompany them to the bathroom? Or maybe just lurk there, and no one will notice? Seriously, this is a classic example of the wrong kind of caution. The greater threat in schools comes from employees of the school, background checks or not ( here's a story from the Washington Post). My neighbor has worked in the county superior court for 30+ years. After a local math teacher was arrested 9 months ago, she told us that this problem is a lot more common than people like to think it is. I remember no less than 4 teachers/coaches in my high school who were fired for lewd behavior with students (in a five-year-period), and a fifth one made lewd comments constantly. But I guess that making parents show driver's licences makes people feel better, so that's what we do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 454
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 454 |
Sorry, but I don't see how any adult can function without some sort of photo ID. When my kids renewed their p-a-s-s-p-o-r-t-s it took less than two weeks to receive the new ones. Not a big deal. Heck, the kids need photo ID to take the SAT or ACT now, so might as well get an ID.
And if the school (or any other place) is going to require photo ID for one person, they really need to require it for all. You don't know who might be a danger to others, which kid has a non-custodial parent that requires supervised visits, etc. There was one parent that DH and I couldn't understand why he was hesitant to help with the rec sports. Such a nice guy, our kids are friends with his kids, our kids have been over to his home for birthday parties, etc. Then we see his photo as the lead story on the local evening news (and we live in a major metropolitan area).
Everyone here accepts that we don't know the allergies or medical conditions of other folks...why can't we accept that we don't know the criminal background of other folks?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,898
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,898 |
School security in the US is not about child molestation, is it now, people. It's about shootings. We have child molestation here too, but not schools where parents have to show id.
Email: my username, followed by 2, at google's mail
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 235 |
I didn't say that. My point was the one poster was offended that they had to show ID at the door and didn't need to because their kid was in a classroom. I don't see how their can be a wrong kind of caution. You may be right about the greater threat from within the school but that wasn't what was being discussed. The secretary at my daughter's school office always ID my wife when she came to the office even though her daughter and mine were the same homeroom classroom and did Girl Scouts together.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
Most kidnappings are committed by non-custodial parents, and schools are an easy place to conduct such a kidnapping. So yes, scanning drivers' licenses at school does serve a purpose, even if it doesn't apply to your child. http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91365&page=1&singlePage=trueAccording to statistics cited by the NCMEC, most missing children are abducted by relatives or parents: a soon-to-be released report, the Second National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway, and Thrownaway Children, referred to as NISMART-2, finds that 203,900 kids were abducted in 1999 by family members or parents. Approximately, 58,200 were "non-family" abductions — only 115 were defined as the frightening kidnappings by strangers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,946
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,946 |
I understand that most people have IDs, but we should be allowed to walk down the street without needing to produce ID-- yet in our area, police routinely ask for ID. I rarely carry ID when not driving.
Photo id is NOT free here. Haven't checked lately, but 20 years ago, it was 25.00.
I won't even touch on immigration, natural disaster, and theft-- all reasons for not having an ID or having an id that reveals inaccuracies. With an id, people can find out lots of stuff that invades privacy. I do not give out my ssn and that number is on driver's licenses. I don't want my school having that info, or the secretary at the school. Identity is precious, something to be protected. I don't give out info without a legit reason.
Usually when I visit school, I walk. One time when I tried to vote at the school, they asked for my id. I almost didn't vote til a supervisor came and asked me for more info, then allowed me to vote.
Count me on the side of not wanting all my info out there to anyone who cares to see it. I have no problem with prescreening, and no problem with flashing the license. But I don't want people who I don't know, writing down my info, taking pictures of my license, etc. Has everyone in that office been screened? (especially this applies to medical facilities!--you can verify who I am and take what you need to submit a claim but you do NOT need my infant's ssn).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
School security in the US is not about child molestation, is it now, people. It's about shootings. Sort of. Abuse in schools is a huge problem. Yes, the locked doors and the lockdown drills are about the shootings, but again, it's the wrong kind of caution. Very sadly, we've been shown that locked doors don't stop people with guns, just like asking parents to show ID (especially to people who know them) won't stop school employees from molesting kids. TBH, all this reminds me of the bomb drills kids had to do in the 1950s and 1960s. Like hiding under your desk was going to provide meaningful protection from an H-bomb. Those drills served to scare people, just like today's so-called necessary cautionary measures scare people and keep them in a frenzy about one thing while the root problems are ignored. It's about where you want people to focus their attention, not meaningful security.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2 |
I understand that most people have IDs, but we should be allowed to walk down the street without needing to produce ID-- yet in our area, police routinely ask for ID. I rarely carry ID when not driving.
Photo id is NOT free here. Haven't checked lately, but 20 years ago, it was 25.00.
I won't even touch on immigration, natural disaster, and theft-- all reasons for not having an ID or having an id that reveals inaccuracies. With an id, people can find out lots of stuff that invades privacy. I do not give out my ssn and that number is on driver's licenses. I don't want my school having that info, or the secretary at the school. Identity is precious, something to be protected. I don't give out info without a legit reason. When the government provides valuable benefits, it needs to verify that recipients are legitimate. To send your child to a neighborhood public school, you need to prove that your child is age-eligible and that he or she lives in the school district. Sometimes schools investigate whether a child lives where his parents say he does. That's an invasion of privacy, but how do you avoid it? I know of at least one child who is illegally attending a school one of our children attends. The problem is not theoretical. Free and reduced price student lunches will require parental financial disclosure. When your children apply to college, applying for financial aid means dealing with the dreaded FAFSA form. The cost of hassling people and invading their privacy needs to be weighed against the cost to taxpayers of fraud.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
Now our district has some sort of policy where classroom doors are supposed to be closed and locked, but as a result the teachers just feel free to scream at the kids and carry on, since no one can hear it anymore. Another mom asked if her DD could be subject accelerated for math and the principal used the excuse that "it wouldn't be safe for her to walk down the hallway alone and it's against policy". Gimme a break! I do understand verifying who people are before allowing them to roam the hallways, and locking back doors during school hours so people can't sneak in, but it can be taken too far. If they were really worried about the kids' safety they would watch videos of the doors so that 5-6 year old kids can't continue to sneak out the way they have been. But of course, the school board or paper pushers from the district aren't aware of the fact that kids are leaving the school grounds or getting lost because that type of thing doesn't make the news and is never reported. Dh was supposed to pick up an extra child from school and the kid left the school through the wrong door and actually walked to our house by himself (through a neighborhood unfamiliar to him) while Dh was at the school trying to find him. We're talking about a 6 year old. Ultimately a neighbor recognized him and picked him up and drove him back to the school and found Dh. Of course, no one at the school seemed too concerned that that happened, but they are worried about locking doors and asking for IDs, even if they already know the person.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 599
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 599 |
My ssn is not on my license....I wonder what states do that?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 80
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 80 |
Never heard of an SSN on a license either.
My DS's public elementary school has 800 students and is in an urban area. If they didn't check id for people entering the school, it would mean that ANYONE could go in. The front desk staff can't possibly keep up with the parents, step parents grandparents aunts and uncles of 800 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739 |
Personally I don't have a problem showing ID to enter a school. A parent not being allowed to enter or to observe their child's classroom? That I do have a problem with.
All last year we were not allowed to spend even 5 seconds in DD's classroom. With a teacher who was utterly out of her depth and didn't seem to make even token efforts to implement the IEP, no efforts whatsoever to accommodate or differentiate, a child with school based anxiety and reports of paras and other adults making amazingly inappropriate comments to and about her we were absolutely helpless. DD required alternate lighting in order to help with her migraines - we were never even able to see if the proper lighting was set up for her. And when our education consultant asked the principal why she had singled DD and our family out to be treated so badly she told him it was because she believed at some point I had entered the building without properly signing in. I don't remember ever doing this and wouldn't have been allowed past the office in any case, not to mention that someone would have had to buzz me in. but in her mind this possibility justified intentionally making my then 7-8 year old's life as difficult as possible.
Again safety concerns I understand. But the type of thing we experienced was purely an attempt to desperately clutch onto power and control. And the worst is that despite a crescendo of complaints by parents outside the school building no one said or did anything because they feared retaliation. That has nothing to do with fear of shooters or pedophiles. That has to do with fear of the person entrusted with your child's safety. How sad is that?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489 |
Never heard of an SSN on a license either.
My DS's public elementary school has 800 students and is in an urban area. If they didn't check id for people entering the school, it would mean that ANYONE could go in. The front desk staff can't possibly keep up with the parents, step parents grandparents aunts and uncles of 800 kids. I was surprised and shocked by this as well but turns out that it is legal for the Social Security number to be used as the Driver's License number. http://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/ssnreportc6.html
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,076 Likes: 6 |
In most states that use the SSN as the ID#, you can ask to have an alternate ID# generated.
...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489 |
I agree that it is reasonable to require an ID. My DS's High School only requires that you sign in and that you look like you know what you are doing.
Locking down the schools in my area of California to the above extent would be practically impossible. The elementary school classrooms all have doors to the outside. Parents often wait outside these doors to pick up in the afternoon. And that is the brand building only a few years old. Officially during the school day you are supposed to go through the front door, sign in, have a appropriate reason, and show ID if the staff ask. But if a teacher is having a party parents often skip that are go straight to the room.
Last edited by bluemagic; 06/17/14 02:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
Our school also has MANY doors to the outside. They dealt with this by putting up an 8-foot chain link perimeter fence. Most doors are also now locked during the school day.
At my child's preschool, which was also a private school, they put codes on all the doors.
There is also a police officer assigned to every school in my district now. YES. EVERY SCHOOL. I don't know if they are always there, but it seems like it. I shudder at the cost. I live in a mid-sized city without any notable history of shootings, gangs or school violence.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032 |
I wasn't "offended" at the idea of showing ID -- I can't recall really ever being "offended" at anything, to be honest. But I would put up a great show of it, if the question ever arose. My point was that "driver's licenses" are being used for everything under the sun, when they are about one thing and one thing only -- driving. Same with Social Security cards, which are about one thing and one thing only -- Social Security. Everyone thinks they have a right to see your driver's license and SS card for every piddling little thing, and then people wonder why identity theft is rampant. We sign in at the office when we enter the school, and are given a sticker to show that we did. This past year, they started putting name and date on the sticker, as well as having a log book for signing in and (theoretically) out. But having the doors locked, with security cameras rolling and sign-in procedures in place, is no guarantee of security -- the shooter at Sandy Hook broke the glass and unlocked the door, and was duly recorded while doing so. All of these things are only an illusion of safety, while being a real invasion of privacy at the same time. The shooters will get in if they want to, and the child molesters are already there. Now more on topic, we also have a "blanket permission" form in every year's registration packet, that is supposed to give permission for your child to go on all field trips. I sign it every year, for both children. And every time they have a field trip, they send home a permission slip to be signed. If it doesn't come back (DS is good at losing things), someone calls or emails to make sure it's ok for him to go on the field trip. I don't know why they have the blanket permission form, if nobody is going to do anything with the information.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,733 |
But having the doors locked, with security cameras rolling and sign-in procedures in place, is no guarantee of security -- the shooter at Sandy Hook broke the glass and unlocked the door, and was duly recorded while doing so. All of these things are only an illusion of safety, while being a real invasion of privacy at the same time. The shooters will get in if they want to, and the child molesters are already there. See this is exactly my feeling on it! And when I state that people look at me like I am insane. But, really, how is this not common sense and obvious? Suddenly since Sandy Hook there is all this "security" (our school immediately put cameras all up and the doors are all locked and you have to be buzzed in, etc) Uh ,if a maniac wants to shoot their way in with some sort of crazy automatic rifle that spews 100 bullets in 3 minutes then he's gonna do it - just like at Sandy Hook (where they had all that security!) Our school spent of $500,000 on it! 500,000 dollars! It made me sick! Particularly because that is not the answer to the problem! However, colleagues pointed out that it wasn't really about keeping kids safe - its about mitigating the schools liability in the event a shooting does happen and since that is becoming ever more likely ... Having said that, I do think some protocol is needed and schools do need to be careful. In neighboring districts we have had adults either posing as a parent or a family friend come in and literally kidnap (and then molest) a child. Terrible. Awful. Crazy. ETA: The cameras have proved their usefulness as well - when I went to pick up DS in the middle of the day and the school wasn't sure where he was she looked at the security camera and could see he was leaving the cafeteria and was on his way to the classroom. I begrudgingly had to admit that was handy .
Last edited by Irena; 06/17/14 03:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
Our school also has MANY doors to the outside. They dealt with this by putting up an 8-foot chain link perimeter fence. Most doors are also now locked during the school day.
At my child's preschool, which was also a private school, they put codes on all the doors.
There is also a police officer assigned to every school in my district now. YES. EVERY SCHOOL. I don't know if they are always there, but it seems like it. I shudder at the cost. I live in a mid-sized city without any notable history of shootings, gangs or school violence. Assuming a police officer earning 100k covers a school with about 400 students full time for the school year, that's less than $200 per capita. That would be an interesting cost-benefit analysis to read. I wonder whether the spend was justified on the basis of threats to the children from within the school, from outside, or both.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
There was an armed police officer on duty at Columbine.
IMO, this is more of the same: being seen to be doing something. If a shooter knows that a cop is on duty, the cop may be his first target.
Plus, having cops on duty increases the likelihood that young children will be arrested for minor disciplinary infractions, as has happened very frequently in recent years.
ETA: I can see that having armed police officers at school can sound like a good idea in theory. But in practice, I'm not sure it's a great idea or the best use of the police force. Plus, there must be a better way to deal with school shootings than upping the ante.
Last edited by Val; 06/17/14 03:51 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
I'm just going to observe, here, that while I can't disagree with Nautigal and Irena (in fact, I agree wholeheartedly), um-- have you BEEN to the airport lately?? Just noting that.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 599
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 599 |
What about the field trip ....did it happen...did the sky fall when he didn't go?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 111
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 111 |
But having the doors locked, with security cameras rolling and sign-in procedures in place, is no guarantee of security -- the shooter at Sandy Hook broke the glass and unlocked the door, and was duly recorded while doing so. All of these things are only an illusion of safety, while being a real invasion of privacy at the same time. The shooters will get in if they want to, and the child molesters are already there. I understand that it might be an illusion, but I would also point out that it gives school personnel some feeling of control. They are scared. As a teacher, I am scared every time I hear about a school shooting. I know it's not statistically rational, but I can't help but play out scenarios in my head. I also worry because my mother has a severe mental illness and is to have no contact with DS without DH or myself present. But she could easily pick him up at school. We've talked to school personnel, but in reality I know it could happen. And if it did happen, we'd need a record of who had been at the school (sign-in, security footage, etc.). Many schools use security footage on a fairly regular basis. It's naive to think it's not a useful tool.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 272
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 272 |
Hi everyone - this thread isn't really related to the purpose of this forum, so I am locking it.
|
|
|
|
|