Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 381 guests, and 30 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 669
    S
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 669
    Go math here. Can't give any information except son doesn't complain and shows progress each time they test him (and they test a lot).

    I think he does his assignment quickly and the spends his waiting time on different math websites on the computer in the back of the room...that may be where he actually learns new stuff.


    ...reading is pleasure, not just something teachers make you do in school.~B. Cleary
    Joined: May 2012
    Posts: 235
    N
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    N
    Joined: May 2012
    Posts: 235
    My daughter is in 6th grade and didn't do Everyday Math since 2nd Grade. She's in Accelerated Algebra so I don't think she will have anything to do with Go Math anyways but the school district here is one of the better ones

    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    We have the NZ national curriculum. It specifies topic and standards but not texts. There are texts to go along with them but I haven't found anyone who used them. The result is we have no idea what the kids are or aren't learning. Can you tell I am getting grumpy?

    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    L
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    [/quote]

    Maybe *some* kids need to have their math facts down before attempting multi-digit multiplication, but not all kids. DS would have gone nuts if we had withheld showing him long multiplication and division until he had mastery of his times tables. In fact, practicing long multiplication problems turned out to be a great way to practice his math facts. [/quote]

    Agreed. DD4.5 still has a hard time doing 3+4 but takes under a second to do 343+434. Also, re: Singapore math, I just got the 2A and 2B workbooks and DD is not too thrilled. There actually seems to be a lot of repetitions as they try to approach the same concept from different angles. I am letting her skip most of it and sometimes just do the review section to keep her engaged.

    Last edited by Lovemydd; 03/06/14 12:02 PM.
    Joined: Mar 2012
    Posts: 100
    R
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    R
    Joined: Mar 2012
    Posts: 100
    Originally Posted by blackcat
    I don't know--here's a website describing Singapore Math. I thought it was a good curriculum but it might not have ENOUGH drill on basic facts, like it might introduce multiplication and then a couple lessons later it's expecting the kid to solve 96X8. They have to learn their math facts before they can do that, so outside drill/practice besides the regular curriculum is needed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_math

    Many of the conceptual math programs run into this issue... if you are using their methods you have to buy into it and can't revert back to what you learned in school...

    For a problem like 96x8 they probably don't expect you to use the long multiplication algorithm... that certainly isn't how *I* would solve it.

    Now lets see.... 96*8
    Well if the kid already has an ok grasp of place value they probably know 100*8=800. So 96*8 is 4 less 8s. So 8x4=32, thats either memorized of easily figured out. So 800-32, well thats subtraction. If multidigit subtraction has been covered you're all set.

    Singapore, Math Mammoth, MEP, and at higher levels AOPS are very big on mental math strategies. If the problems seem very tedious or too difficult for the age range, you are probably doing it wrong and should look for an easier approach. This allows kids to build deeper number sense and problem solving skills. However, if you take a Singapore workbook and try to teach it using a traditional American style... well thats not going to work.

    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    B
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    I didn't buy the Singapore Math textbook which is probably part of the problem with there seeming to be large gaps. I'm not sure how the textbook teaches them to do divison for example. In DS's 3A workbook in exercise 34 there are problems like 28/7. DS has this memorized, or if he didn't, he could skip count by 7's, so no problem. Then a couple pages later it is 803/7. I'm not sure if they are expecting kids to write this out the long way or do it in their head or what. I told DS to forget about writing it out the long way. 7 goes into 8 one time so write a 1 above the 8. There is 1 left over so write a little one in front of the zero. Now you have a 10. 7 goes into 10 1 time. Write a 1 above the 0. There's 3 left over. Write a 3 in front of the other 3 so you have a 33. 7 goes into 33 4 times, and you have 5 left over. That's your remainder. So then his first grade teacher put him on the computer to do above level testing and started sending home problems like convert 546 inches into feet. She attached graph paper for him to "show his work." I had to explain to her that I didn't teach him how to do long division the normal way, he wouldn't know what to write on graph paper. But I will try.


    Joined: Feb 2014
    Posts: 336
    A
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Feb 2014
    Posts: 336
    blackcat, you might try this report about enVision: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=618 Our district uses it and I think it's ok, though I've seen a few worksheets that required some non-math-related knowledge to get a correct mathematical answer which I felt might be unfair to some kids. FWIW the web archive page you linked seems to be dated 1999.

    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    I think maybe - 803/7.

    Well more than a 100, 7*100 =700
    103/7. Well 7 *10=70, 4*7=28, 70+28 =98
    So 100+10+4=114 with 5 left over.

    That I can do in my head.

    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    B
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,157
    Aufilia--thanks for the link. That makes me feel somewhat better about it.

    puffin--i wonder if that's what Singapore Math teaches them to do. I think that's what DS is doing when he multiplies large numbers, like 96X12. But he makes too many errors so the teacher is trying to get him to write it down and carry numbers the normal way. For a kid with good working memory it probably is fine but he is only in first grade and has pretty average working memory so that's probably why it's a problem. I tell him it's fine to do it in his head, but can he please write it the normal way afterwards to check his answer.

    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    Quote
    DD4.5 still has a hard time doing 3+4 but takes under a second to do 343+434.

    Whoa. I don't get this at all. Brains are weird.

    Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by indigo - 05/01/24 05:21 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5