0 members (),
267
guests, and
44
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
Do you feel positive? Negative? Neutral? Disillusioned?
When my first child started kindergarten I was excited, and assumed the schools would do what is right for kids. Now I feel very naive. I feel like I've had to fight for everything. Getting an IEP for my child in the first place, getting both of them differentiated work (which didn't/isn't happening in the classroom to the extent it should be addressed), identifying disorders in my child. Identifying giftedness. It has all been ME. If I had sat back and done nothing, my younger kid would not have an IEP, and my older kid would not have an ADHD diagnosis (despite it being obvious). No one would have suggested acceleration or differentiated work.
What I want to know, is it like this everywhere? Are there school districts/schools that are actually good and kids get their needs met? How do you feel?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 429
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 429 |
sigh... in our neck of the woods, the most discouraging aspect is that teachers are not permitted to teach outside the scope of the year's curriculum. so differentiation means "different work", rather than "appropriate work." it shocked me to the core.
hence, the homeschooling.
Every Sunday it brooded and lay on the floor. Inconveniently close to the drawing-room door.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
Even in a state with mandatory services for gifted students, the school threw up a number of roadblocks in DD's way, and it was a long, laborious process to get her into the situation she really needs.
However, for the first time, I'm actually feeling positive about public school at this stage.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739 |
I am glad to read that Dude is feeling positive. I haven't heard anything positive from anyone in a long, long time. The "good" teachers I have encountered are older and more experienced. Most importantly trained before this NCLB nonsense. Younger teachers only know the current system where they check off boxes and teach to the test. Our gifted or 2e kids are basically ALL outside those boxes so they are just simply unprepared to meet their needs. Even when needs are very apparent their hands are tied. I have a lot of teacher friends and I think they are universally frustrated. As are most parents I know. Well the informed ones who are actually involved in their kids' lives and educations anyway.
Right now our district is spending a small fortune to get DD's needs met in an out of district placement but they still can't get their heads out of the "formula" approach to education and get the heck out of the way.
Bottom line is I cannot imagine DD ever stepping foot in a public school again. If we can get her needs remediated sufficiently we will definitely be looking for a nice progressive private with a "meet the kids where they are" approach. I think the "better" school districts may be more responsive to individual needs but it doesn't mean their hands aren't tied. I really wonder if the one-size-fits-all approach works for anyone. By the end of last year most of DD's friends were coming home from school crying, or crying themselves to sleep at night or even in one case on home bound tutoring because of anxiety. Really second grade should not be that way. It really, truly shouldn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 756
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 756 |
I think it is hard for most parents on here to be fair judges of public school systems because we have such unusual children.
While every kid is entitled to free and appropriate education, figuring what that means in a statistical outlier is difficult when you consider that kids are developmental moving targets. As soon as you think you have their issues identified and a plan in place, they grow and mature and outgrow old problems and develop new ones.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 756
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 756 |
I don't mean to sound like the system should be off the hook for our kids. I just meant the system could be great for the vast majority of children and we'd never know it because it wasn't created with outliers in mind.
There is a very good school district nearby that many parents love. However, I have heard from 2E parents that they are very rigid and difficult to work with.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
I think it is hard for most parents on here to be fair judges of public school systems because we have such unusual children.
While every kid is entitled to free and appropriate education, figuring what that means in a statistical outlier is difficult when you consider that kids are developmental moving targets. As soon as you think you have their issues identified and a plan in place, they grow and mature and outgrow old problems and develop new ones. That's an excellent point. What I have found most distressing is the level of callousness and inertia, though. I've become so cynical that even mediocre educators (just looking objectively at WHAT they are doing relative to what I know from my own background in education) seem to "shine" in comparison with most of the shenanigans that go on in curriculum and instruction these days. Teachers aren't really "teachers" anymore. They are "content delivery specialists." Well, that doesn't say much about what happens when a child needs different CONTENT, though, does it? Which goes a long way to explaining why teachers resent and fear inquisitive and bright children more than they ever have before (and it was never awesome, let's face it). A mirroring effect can be observed in meetings with school administrators-- bright and inquisitive parents are not seen as "helpful partners" but as PROBLEMS to be "solved" or "eliminated." Yes, I'm cynical to the core at this point. I'm also exhausted after over 8y of this happy horse-puckey. My dad was a person who had a colorful and profane quip for every occasion, and I find myself channeling him when a system is so messed up that it seems unrecoverable--so I have an increasing itch to SHOUT at school administrators "Don't tell me it's raining!!" for whatever that is worth. I'm also not alone. I know VERY few parents of recent high school graduates that have anything positive to say at all about public education. Educat ors, yes-- mixed bag. I have my gold star list there, as well. Many of them are no longer in the profession, however, and I find that alone to be very telling. I cannot wait to be quit of this in June. Can.not.WAIT. I loathe my dd's school. There are some fine teachers there, but frankly, the world would be a better place if a 900-year-old alien who lives in a blue phone box would appear and send Pearson and all of its many subsidiaries into an alternate dimension. (Yes, I know-- but a girl can dream...) Heck, I'd settle for a Dalek invasion if David Tennant is busy. LOL.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
I have a generally dim view of the US K-16 education system as a whole. IMO, it rests on flawed philosophies. As an example, how much can you expect from a system that defines a highly qualified teacher as someone who has a BA in any subject, has passed a test, and has a certification? See information here. I see these requirements as being the minimum, not the gold standard implied by the term highly qualified. Another huge problem pushed by our schools (and others) is the fantasy that anyone can become president/a scientist/whatever. This inclusive philosophy sounds nice, but the reality is that classes end up being watered down in the name of accessibility while students get pushed into going to college. Many end up in remedial courses there and lose income while incurring debt. Nearly half don't graduate. Many of the ones who do have degrees in fluffy subjects like liberal studies (this is NOT the same as a liberal arts college) or business or journalism that don't 1) teach them much or 2) get them jobs. Unless you count service jobs or security jobs as a good use of your pricey BA. All in the name of phony equity. Then there is the multibillion dollar multiple choice test industry. They generally test factoids and encourage a superficial approach to learning. Okay, I have to stop now...but I could go on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
The whole thing about content delievery--yep. If a kid does something and it's not the way the teacher's manual says, they are wrong. Last night I asked my 6 yo if he ever participates in class. He said that they were doing math and the teacher asked them about "strategies" for finding the missing number on a math mountain or pyramid. The problem was 8 at the top of the mountain, 6 on the bottom on one of the sides (the corner of the triangle). How do you find the other corner? DS said he raised his hand and said "take the 8, subtract the 6, and you get the other number 2. Easy Peezy Lemon Squeezy!" Teacher said "No, DS, it has to be a strategy." What? I don't think DS is going to be raising his hand much from now on. I felt like telling him if he wants to take a nap, that's Ok. (this is a kid who is now learning long division at home and is asked innane questions about how to solve 6+___ = 8 in school, and then told he is wrong and isn't using the right strategy when he says to take 8-6!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
Here's another question. Do schools care about kids? I mean in general, not individual teachers (which i'm sure some of them do).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
I am sufficiently unimpressed that I'm working outside the existing system to create a private gifted school for my son (now just 2). It's already obvious that his needs will go unmet; I shudder to think of how my son would fare in a mainstream kindergarten given that he already seems to know what most 4-5 y/olds are expected to know curriculum-wise.
My husband and I both had inadequate support in the public school system.
I think the notion of a strong public school system is noble, and necessary for a strong, well-functioning country, but that our educational establishment's concept of "cohort" is what sours the experience for anyone far from the mean. I would love to see ability-based groupings, not age-groups, for all students. That, to me, is the only realistic way to ensure that all students' needs are met, at all points along the ability continuum.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
Here's another question. Do schools care about kids? I mean in general, not individual teachers (which i'm sure some of them do). Here, no. You get the odd teacher or principal who is invested in students, but most seem to be paper-pushing automatons who are more concerned with gaining union seniority than teaching. I don't say this to paint all teachers badly. There are many committed members of the teaching profession who are outstanding at what they do and who make children's lives better every day by their work. However, in my province, the qualified keep getting muzzled by the greedy near-retirees who want to keep new blood and new ideas out of the profession. Cronyism at its worst, from the top down. Happily, this works in my favour starting a school because it will allow me to attract the most motivated, innovative teachers of the bunch. ETA: I attended a private high school, and the messaging couldn't have been more different than in the public system. Each student was treated as a valuable legacy. I can only think of one or two teachers who weren't exceptional in their knowledge, commitment to maintaining a high standard, or dedication to students on a personal level. Most of the teaching staff *volunteered* time to run extra-curricular activities. I think that speaks volumes.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
The whole thing about content delievery--yep. If a kid does something and it's not the way the teacher's manual says, they are wrong. I just had a conversation with DD's principal about this. More on the Difficult Teacher thread.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 739 |
Here's another question. Do schools care about kids? I mean in general, not individual teachers (which i'm sure some of them do). In theory they will all say that they do. I mean people tend to enter teaching with noble intentions. They love children. They want to make a difference. Then they get caught up in minutia and lose sight of their real purpose. Education gets lost and they focus on the rubric, the protocol, the strategies. Unfortunately this approach will only work with kids who have the most basic of needs. A kid from an uneducated household without the supports in place may do ok in this environment. Once again the kids from this forum, no probably not. Oh and DH is a professor. Over the years many of his colleagues have made clear that education majors are very sincere and they tend to be "nice" kids. However they are also the least bright. In other words the lowest common denominator may also be at work in the selection process concerning who enters the profession to begin with.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Here's another question. Do schools care about kids? I mean in general, not individual teachers (which i'm sure some of them do). Who said that "Education" is about kids? That's like saying that a souffle is about eggs. (I'd love to put a winking smiley in here, but I'm feeling too enraged and disgusted this morning to do that.)
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Extremely negative. My background: I attended public schools K-12. I worked almost 10 years in public schools, about 7 years in private schools (I have worked part time with one foot in each system). Public schools have only gotten worse. I have no hope for public schools. The entire system needs to be obliterated. I am not kidding.
Here are my issues as a former employee: 1. The states in which I worked, I was forced to be a part of the teacher's union. When I first started, I was a huge supporter of the union. Within just a couple of years, I saw the thieving that took place in my particular system, the physical bullying when I attempted to stay beyond my contacted hours to assist students, and the generally us vs. them (union vs. administrators and kids) attitude that was encouraged by union leaders. Save for 1 district that I worked in, the union couldn't have been more unprofessional. And I worked in schools in every imaginable district, rich, poor, homogeneous, etc.
2. Very poor quality teacher training. I went to a "prestigious" college with a teacher certification program. It was touted as being on of the best. The quality was so poor, it was really unbelievable. Since, in my opinion, there are so few good teachers out there (I would give it a ballpark figure of maybe 10%), you can't find any decent mentors for student teachers. The bulk of what was taught was classroom management. This was about 20 years ago and from what I hear it's taken a drastic turn for the worse...because now they focus on classroom management with the goal of getting students to master the standardized tests.
3. Fifty+ years ago, teaching was considered a worthy, honorable profession. (This will be controversial - I know.) When women were not allowed or encouraged to be professionals such as doctors, lawyers, etc., there were many more really bright and capable elementary school female teachers. Talented women were encouraged to be teachers, paralegals and nurses. As these women were able to enter and succeed in more male oriented, lucrative positions, I think there has been a brain drain. And men are just not attracted to elementary school positions - it's never going to happen. (I think if teachers were paid a lot more, then the talented women would come back. But I don't expect it to happen any time soon.)
4. Anti-intellectual attitude found in public schools. Every school that I have worked in (except for 1) has had active disdain for gifted children. Sure you may have a teacher here or there who understands and who is interested in educating gifted children. But since (in my opinion) there are extremely few gifted adults working in public schools, there is no understanding of gifted children's traits or needs. I have heard so many horrible things said about gifted children.
5. Drive to create and implement federal standards. So, IMO, there has been a brain drain among public school teachers. Now when you couple that with a drive to introduce federal standards - the effect being that you are required even LESS to think and be creative about teaching goals - because they've all been laid out for you - you don't even have to look at your children in your class to figure out what they really need.
6. The testing insanity will finally cause the system to implode, hopefully.
Now, from my parental viewpoint - this is how I have come to view and utilize public school for my son. (I need to give credit to my DH, who has always told me that public education is "useless" for any child who is even moderately above average...and I spent so many years wondering why he always said that.) As a parent, we use public school to socialize and for "anthropological" experiences. My son goes in the mornings to see his friends, to have fun riding the bus, to experience group music class, use the art materials, have access to a full size gym and to have lunch around a very big table with lots of friends and laughing. My son also learns about how an institution works at stifling any creativity and how it churns out a product using streamlined methods. He has also learned that at 7 years old, he is far more creative and intelligent than many of his teachers.
We've only got another 1.5 years total in public school. Doubtful we will make it that long.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032 |
I can't say I'm disillusioned about the public school system, because that would mean I actually had illusions about it in the first place, and my mother taught me better than that.
For our particular school, I am reasonably positive. They have done many, many things for DS and are doing fine with DD. And we have taxed their ingenuity to great lengths, in some cases. The elementary school staff went out of their way (quite literally, hundreds of miles) to obtain training and knowledge that would help them to help DS in all of his 2E-ness. I don't see that happening with the middle school/high school, but we're still doing ok this year. So far, so good.
For American public schools in general, I don't see it going anywhere but downhill, and steadily. It is only getting worse as each succeeding generation of teachers and administrators comes up, having been educated themselves in the system that is failing. Steadily declining expectations, a society built around the fear of being sued for something, a culture built around the derision of intelligence, all run by increasing quantities of technology that make it unnecessary for anyone to know how anything works or how to do anything without it, these are a prescription for disaster.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Here's another question. Do schools care about kids? I mean in general, not individual teachers (which i'm sure some of them do). Absolutely some of the teachers care. I know some teachers who have actually fostered neglected children. There are some angel teachers out there. I think schools as an institution don't care one bit about children. They care about jobs and the movement of children along an assembly line.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
The whole thing about content delievery--yep. If a kid does something and it's not the way the teacher's manual says, they are wrong. I just had a conversation with DD's principal about this. More on the Difficult Teacher thread. ... and I'm about to. Now dealing with a dismissive, power-tripping teacher that has less than no interest in her STUDENTS in a class that my daughter MUST have to graduate. An unweighted class in which the grading is so incomprehensible and seemingly capricious that it poses a serious risk to her in terms of scholarship awards this year. This teacher is wrapping herself in a mantle of professional alphabet soup and titles, and is ignoring the fact that not one, but TWO subject experts that my DD's been consulting with, have declared her grading and commentary to be nonsensical, overly harsh, or even just plain WRONG. I can't say I'm disillusioned about the public school system, because that would mean I actually had illusions about it in the first place, and my mother taught me better than that. Well, that's the thing, isn't it? I've been horrified by it at this point, and I'm probably the most difficult person on earth to SHOCK about this industry/profession/environment. It's gotten bad. REALLY bad. I used to think that people who wanted to Holt the entire system were crazy right-wing wackos. I still think that. But I'm starting to agree that the system that we have NOW, in 2013, is worthy of precisely that sentiment. The corporate players who are calling most of the shots in school C&I need to be nuked, for a start. While Common Core was a great set of ideas, it's never going to work with teachers who are mere automatons, and that's exactly what we have when they are punished for deviations from "the script" (and they are)... and as long as "C&I/assessment specialists" are writing the material for classroom use, rather than people who, you know, actually work every day with STUDENTS who are real human beings, this is going nowhere good.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... is it like this everywhere? Are there school districts/schools that are actually good and kids get their needs met? How do you feel? Many families may be pleased with their children's education and we hear this frequently from families with kids in the middle, athletes, moderately gifted, and hothoused high achieving. They are incredulous that families with HG+ kids are disappointed with the very school system they adore. In summary, schools are built for mass-production but have difficulty with customization.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
In summary, schools are built for mass-production but have difficulty with customization. Yes, because they're designed to take advantage of economies of scale. That model breaks when dealing with outliers. Also, there's the human element. In my DD's case, the educators all saw each other as trained and experienced experts in education and child development. When they looked across the table, they did not see two people with doctorate degrees in DD-ology. Had they viewed us as a qualified partner with unique information that they required to adequately serve DD, things would have been smoother. In their defense... much like we've all dealt with educators who are woefully unqualified to do the job, the schools have dealt with scores of parents who are woefully unqualified for theirs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
When they looked across the table, they did not see two people with doctorate degrees in DD-ology. Had they viewed us as a qualified partner with unique information that they required to adequately serve DD... DS2's music teacher won my heart on day one with a statement to the effect of, "I am merely a music facilitator. You are all your children's most important teacher, and you have a deeper knowledge of your child's needs than I have." Bingo. Let's clone her!
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 393
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 393 |
This leads me to the questions I've been pondering recently. Can and/or will public school be able to serve my ds? I'm just not sure.
Also, if the answer is no or not well; what is plan b??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
In summary, schools are built for mass-production but have difficulty with customization. Yes, because they're designed to take advantage of economies of scale. That model breaks when dealing with outliers. Also, there's the human element. In my DD's case, the educators all saw each other as trained and experienced experts in education and child development. When they looked across the table, they did not see two people with doctorate degrees in DD-ology. Had they viewed us as a qualified partner with unique information that they required to adequately serve DD, things would have been smoother. In their defense... much like we've all dealt with educators who are woefully unqualified to do the job, the schools have dealt with scores of parents who are woefully unqualified for theirs.YES.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
... is it like this everywhere? Are there school districts/schools that are actually good and kids get their needs met? How do you feel? Many families may be pleased with their children's education and we hear this frequently from families with kids in the middle, athletes, moderately gifted, and hothoused high achieving. They are incredulous that families with HG+ kids are disappointed with the very school system they adore. In summary, schools are built for mass-production but have difficulty with customization. Yes, whenever I display "displeasure" to other parents in the district, I get looks of confusion (unless it is other parents of special needs kids). And I end up feeling that I must be unreasonable to be so unhappy. I would estimate that 90 percent of the parents in the district are happy. The other 10 percent who are not happy, the district would prefer to sweep under the rug. Most of those 90 percent of parents have probably never had to deal with the administration or had a serious concern. But even with those 90 percent, is the district really meeting their needs? Or are they just faking it well and parents are clueless?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
See Dude's observation for an explanation of perhaps 20-60% of that "happy" cohort.
JMO-- and it's a jaded one at this point.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639 |
Yes, because they're designed to take advantage of economies of scale. That model breaks when dealing with outliers. Another factor that comes into how the PS system is designed and works is that - they groom people for all kinds of futures because society needs the blue collar worker, the janitor, the burger flipper, the garbage man etc (several thousands of these) in addition to rock star CEOs, Presidents and scientists who win Nobels (we need very few of these). After pondering a lot on this, my theory is that the outliers are expected to help themselves using their innate talents and the system grooms people who are below average, average and above average to move on and fit into society's hierarchy. When you see the system working, you can get the feel that they educate the majority of kids to be mediocre (which is what the society wants) and the effort being put into the education is also mediocre. I dealt with a "cream of the crop" PS in california and the attitude of their star administrators and their star teachers were mostly of the kind "I am a public servant, don't expect too much out of me". Sorry for the cynicism, I am now dealing with a private school and the attitude difference towards education is stark - you will never catch this school playing a Disney movie during rainy day recess (as my son's PS was bound to do).
Last edited by ashley; 10/24/13 11:06 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
I don't really have one opinion of "the public school system." It's too large of an entity. Even within one district--even within one school--my children's experiences have varied dramatically from year to year. I feel lucky that we have the gifted magnet and recognize ou good fortune there.
DS5 has a very good teacher there who is going WAY out of her way for him without us having done much to make that happen. I believe she is truly passionate about making sure he learns at school. I am deeply touched by her devotion to meeting my child's needs.
I do feel that people expect a great deal--sometimes too much. I am sympathetic to the teachers' situation. I do not envy them. I do blame the test-crazed culture and also the constant "You have to do this, you have to do that" and "New rule, new rule!" nonsense for a lot of the problematic culture.
As to many/most people being happy--I think this is true, but some of this is congitive dissnonance. It's uncomfortable being unhappy and dissatisifed. It's like how everyone hates Congress but thinks their personal representatives are okay. Everyone thinks schools are failing as a whole but rates their own school as pretty good. If they thought it was terrible, but left their children there and did nothing--well, what does that say about them?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 354
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 354 |
Where we are, public or private, the schools do not have any services for 2E... if a child has (ex.) sensory processing issues, but has advanced comprehension, they are out of luck until either comprehension drops to meet the SPD or the SPD goes away. We were told that our DD is SO smart that when she decides not to be dysgraphic, she will indeed not be dysgraphic! It is SO archaic here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
I don't really have one opinion of "the public school system." It's too large of an entity. Even within one district--even within one school--my children's experiences have varied dramatically from year to year. I agree completely. It's why I only answered the question with regard to how I feel it's servicing my specific DD's needs at this specific time. My response could change tomorrow. The high school I attended would have, in NCLB days, been rated a failure. Yet except for my horrendous physics/calculus teacher, I received a high-quality education there. Based on that experience, I don't see any value in even rating public education at an institutional level, because individual outcomes will be so... individual.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
two people with doctorate degrees in DD-ology. In their defense... much like we've all dealt with educators who are woefully unqualified to do the job, the schools have dealt with scores of parents who are woefully unqualified for theirs. I appreciate your balanced view. It can be tough to maintain that degree of open-mindedness.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 690
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 690 |
I think as a whole, it's not feasible to expect it to serve every child efficiently and effectively. Children are not factory-farmed creatures and yet it seems that design is what our public schools mirror. Add to that the very real problem of poverty and the culture of disengagement and despair that poverty can sometimes create, and the ridiculous expectation that public education and specifically, teachers, make that all go away by the time it's time to test them, well, it's a wonder anything gets done.
I have to say, though, I have been very happy with the education my ds11 and ds24 received. I'll talk about ds11 for brevity's sake, though both were identified as gifted in the same school system. Ds's kindergarten teacher was the one to identify him for the gifted program despite the fact he was/is such a good kid that often his behavior is the foremost thing a person notices about him. He's had excellent teachers most of whom did a fair job of offering challenge and encouragement. When, last year, I went to the school system with more information from the Explore test, they were supportive and proactive, offering to test him further. They were also supportive regarding acceleration. They are also proactive in trying to identify as many gifted kids as they can and they recognize that it may be harder to identify kids from low SES, but they're still there. The teachers in our system are highly educated and dedicated and if the state doesn't chase them all away, my child has a good chance of continuing on in a successful way.
Is is perfect? No. It's not Davidson, which seems to be a dream for the gifted population. However, I don't expect it to be and I'm trying to supplement at home whenever and however I can.
One thing I would love to see is administrators allowing teachers to teach, less trying to teach to 24 levels in a class of 24, and less lowering of expectations.
Last edited by KADmom; 10/24/13 12:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 45
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 45 |
In my DD's case, the educators all saw each other as trained and experienced experts in education and child development. When they looked across the table, they did not see two people with doctorate degrees in DD-ology. Had they viewed us as a qualified partner with unique information that they required to adequately serve DD, things would have been smoother. The principal of my son's former school once raised her voice with me in the school lobby and said, "WE are education PROFESSIONALS." I was flabbergasted. I wish I would have responded, "I have an M.Ed. in Educational Leadership just like you do. I ALSO have a Ph.D. in DS." Instead, I left before things got too heated and made sure the signature block in my summary e-mail included both my current position at the local university and my degree. She responded much more nicely to me after that. . . The number one requirement for us in selecting DS' new school was whether or not the front office staff, teachers, and administrators smiled and gave warm and genuine greetings to students and parents. We visited on several occasions at different times of the day to get a good sense of how inviting schools were. If we got courteous but cold welcomes or if many of the children seemed unhappy, we stayed as far away as possible. For now at least, we think we've found a good fit, regardless of school grade and availability of gifted programming (although they do have both part time pull out and full time gifted classes).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 429
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 429 |
In my DD's case, the educators all saw each other as trained and experienced experts in education and child development. When they looked across the table, they did not see two people with doctorate degrees in DD-ology. Had they viewed us as a qualified partner with unique information that they required to adequately serve DD, things would have been smoother. The principal of my son's former school once raised her voice with me in the school lobby and said, "WE are education PROFESSIONALS." I was flabbergasted. I wish I would have responded, "I have an M.Ed. in Educational Leadership just like you do. I ALSO have a Ph.D. in DS." Instead, I left before things got too heated and made sure the signature block in my summary e-mail included both my current position at the local university and my degree. She responded much more nicely to me after that. . . The number one requirement for us in selecting DS' new school was whether or not the front office staff, teachers, and administrators smiled and gave warm and genuine greetings to students and parents. We visited on several occasions at different times of the day to get a good sense of how inviting schools were. If we got courteous but cold welcomes or if many of the children seemed unhappy, we stayed as far away as possible. For now at least, we think we've found a good fit, regardless of school grade and availability of gifted programming (although they do have both part time pull out and full time gifted classes). i'm so sad to hear this kind of thing is so pervasive. we had a version of this last year, too - albeit in a private school. "her classroom teachers know her better than you do." sigh.
Every Sunday it brooded and lay on the floor. Inconveniently close to the drawing-room door.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222 |
The current public school system is what happens when liberals and conservatives both get their way: a mediocre, everyone-is-the-same, community curriculum that is tested to death and big business is the only winner.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,917
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,917 |
I don't really have one opinion of "the public school system." It's too large of an entity. Even within one district--even within one school--my children's experiences have varied dramatically from year to year. I agree completely. It's why I only answered the question with regard to how I feel it's servicing my specific DD's needs at this specific time. My response could change tomorrow. The high school I attended would have, in NCLB days, been rated a failure. Yet except for my horrendous physics/calculus teacher, I received a high-quality education there. Based on that experience, I don't see any value in even rating public education at an institutional level, because individual outcomes will be so... individual. I feel the same. It seems clear to me that a lot of things need to change in the public school system as a whole, but it's impossible for me to judge based on my experiences. Right now, I am thrilled that the MN public school system offers open enrollment, so my child can go to any school as long as there is room. This has created happy islands of magnet programs, where like-minded children (I guess they're not really misfit toys) can be challenged and learn with agemates. We have been very lucky to find such an island within reasonable driving distance for our DS. The teachers there have been given more flexibility in designing curriculum, and it makes all the difference. (Hey, they let the teachers teach!) Ask me next year, when my DS's HG program ends. I'm sure my view will be much darker.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,035 |
I am in NZ and our system is very homogenous throughout the country. Honestly I think it is a good system for the 68% between -/+ 1SD when there are no other problems. It is not good for the 10 to 20% who our so called tail, and it is not goodfor the top 5% but even for them it is free from a lot of the problems complained about on this and other boards.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Sorry to be so negative on this topic. I used to tell my husband that I went through a mourning period when I realized that the public school system that I had loved as a child was actually dead and had no hope of being resurrected.
What makes me particularly frustrated and upset is my son's nosedive with regard to his attitude to school and the adults in it. He went on a 15 minute diatribe the other day after I asked him if he wanted to learn about something. He screamed at me, "I don't want to LEARN about anything. Learning is the worst thing in the world and I hope that nobody on the planet ever has to learn anything ever. Learning is so horrible!"
I started to laugh. I thought that he was kidding because all DS loves to do is learn. Then I asked him what learning means. He said, "learning is what you do in school when you have to sit there all day and learn things that you already know. Learning is sitting and being bored and listening to grown ups talk about the most boring things and then they ignore you all day." His school environment is not allowing him to learn. And as administrators and teachers have told me many times, they are focused on the "high" Common Core standards and making sure that everyone passes the test. The teachers have no choice but to follow their CC aligned curriculum, the administrators have no choice but to enforce the teachers' following it. Everyone is focused on the test scores and bringing the bottom up. Any teacher with the means and the brains have left, by and large. So my son, and many other children who are merely above average are being held hostage in this nutty environment.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7 |
We're having a good experience with our local public school district right now. My DSs have started in the highly academically gifted program and it seems to be a good fit. Would have been even better if academically gifted services started in a meaningful way before third grade.
It may be that my children are only MG by the standards of this board. (Haven't done extensive testing, had 99 CogAt and 96+ ITBS to enroll in program.) However, we are quite happy to finally have them in a school program that seems to be at about the right level for them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 639 |
Sorry to be so negative on this topic. I used to tell my husband that I went through a mourning period when I realized that the public school system that I had loved as a child was actually dead and had no hope of being resurrected.
What makes me particularly frustrated and upset is my son's nosedive with regard to his attitude to school and the adults in it. He went on a 15 minute diatribe the other day after I asked him if he wanted to learn about something. He screamed at me, "I don't want to LEARN about anything. Learning is the worst thing in the world and I hope that nobody on the planet ever has to learn anything ever. Learning is so horrible!"
I started to laugh. I thought that he was kidding because all DS loves to do is learn. Then I asked him what learning means. He said, "learning is what you do in school when you have to sit there all day and learn things that you already know. Learning is sitting and being bored and listening to grown ups talk about the most boring things and then they ignore you all day." His school environment is not allowing him to learn. And as administrators and teachers have told me many times, they are focused on the "high" Common Core standards and making sure that everyone passes the test. The teachers have no choice but to follow their CC aligned curriculum, the administrators have no choice but to enforce the teachers' following it. Everyone is focused on the test scores and bringing the bottom up. Any teacher with the means and the brains have left, by and large. So my son, and many other children who are merely above average are being held hostage in this nutty environment. Wow! So sad that your little child is so frustrated by his learning environment. I mourn the loss of a good education system along with you. I have seen the idiotic common core frenzy around here too. And the "training" going on to shore up test scores and the pointless parent workshops and "community education booths" the school districts run in all the local Fall festivals to teach the masses about common core standards. It looks like it is a multi-year implementation program in California. I hope it is not the case in your area. Good luck to your child and I hope he can get better learning afterschool than from school.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
I think as a whole, it's not feasible to expect it to serve every child efficiently and effectively... One thing I would love to see is administrators allowing teachers to teach, less trying to teach to 24 levels in a class of 24, and less lowering of expectations. It is possible that cluster grouping by readiness and ability, rather than chronological age, would help facilitate learning... benefitting both the students and teachers?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
Where we are, public or private, the schools do not have any services for 2E... if a child has (ex.) sensory processing issues, but has advanced comprehension, they are out of luck until either comprehension drops to meet the SPD or the SPD goes away. We were told that our DD is SO smart that when she decides not to be dysgraphic, she will indeed not be dysgraphic! It is SO archaic here. I am so sorry to hear this. Might it be possible to share an electronic or print copy of the research article in the thread called "New research article on 2e gifted students", with the local school or news media, to raise awareness? (link- http://giftedissues.davidsongifted....search_article_on_2e_gif.html#Post172507)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... background... attended public schools... worked almost 10 years in public schools, about 7 years in private schools (I have worked part time with one foot in each system)... issues as a former employee... Now, from my parental viewpoint... and ... how the PS system is designed and works... they groom people for all kinds of futures because society needs the blue collar worker, the janitor, the burger flipper, the garbage man etc (several thousands of these) in addition to rock star CEOs, Presidents and scientists who win Nobels (we need very few of these). After pondering a lot on this, my theory is that the outliers are expected to help themselves using their innate talents and the system grooms people who are below average, average and above average to move on and fit into society's hierarchy. When you see the system working, you can get the feel that they educate the majority of kids to be mediocre (which is what the society wants) and the effort being put into the education is also mediocre. You see what I see.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
When I tutored in a school last year, I researched things like crazy... One kid reported double vision when he was reading and had some major tracking issues, so I researched it, and figured out his reading speed almost doubled if a blue or yellow overlay was stuck on top of the reading passage. I even recorded his reading speed with and without the overlay and reported my findings to the teacher, and she barely seemed interested. Another girl I had (a 9 year old) had many symptoms of dyslexia and also could not walk down steps alternating feet or do basic things in Phy Ed. I kept bringing this up with hints that she should be evaluated or someone should talk to her mother, and mentioned that she has many symptoms of Developmental Coordination Disorder like my DS, except she was worse (and I even printed a thing out and gave it to her teacher). I got blank stares or shrugs from people. No one was concerned or inquisitive about what this girl's problem could be. I had another third grade girl who didn't know basic vocabularly words like "branch" (as in the branch of a tree). After I nagged them for months and said how concerned I was, in Spring they finally agreed to do an eval in the fall (hopefully they are doing it now!). There were numerous other examples like that. And now I'm seeing the same thing in my kids' school. The teachers... don't seem to take much initiative to do anything to get them special help or figure out what is getting in the way of their learning. The world would be a better place with more people like you! How to get people excited about the differences one person can make, in touching others' lives?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 36
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 36 |
I completely agree with the earlier comments about getting rid of the current system.
We live in what should be a great school district. It has the highest percentage of parents with doctorates (mostly MDs and PhDs in our case, but JDs also count in the census data) in the country. And precisely because they do see some very bright kids, they have very rigid rules for keeping them in line. To the point of prohibiting kids from checking above-grade-level books out of the library.
Parents with average kids seem happy. Many parents with above average kids are not, but are afraid to criticize anything less there be reprisals. There are some teachers that are worse than others, and you never see the most connected parents (i.e., school board members, PTA officers) end up with their kids in those classes.
The one merit of NCLB is that it is shutting down unionized schools and replacing them with either something better, at least on average. The problem is that the shutdown criteria don't adjust for inputs, and so are too easy for schools with good raw material, so for those of us in moderate-to-good neighborhoods, all we see is the wasteful effort that goes into gaming the tests. But NCLB, for all its flaws, is making a difference in inner cities.
It's a pity centrists gave up on vouchers. They would speed up reform dramatically. So would eliminating lotteries at charter schools. If markets were allowed to work, they could get us a lot closer to a solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
I think the requirements to be a teacher should be much higher. Everyone should have a Master's Degree and in depth training in gifted and special needs (esp. now that so many children are mainstreamed). This would just trigger a watering-down of Master's programs. The demand is too great for supply... especially when the financial reward is so far below what Master's holders can earn in other fields. It's a pity centrists gave up on vouchers. They would speed up reform dramatically. So would eliminating lotteries at charter schools. If markets were allowed to work, they could get us a lot closer to a solution. The market is in control at the university level, and that's not going well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,478
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,478 |
The demand is too great for supply... especially when the financial reward is so far below what Master's holders can earn in other fields. Like literature, theatre, and history?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,498 |
But NCLB, for all its flaws, is making a difference in inner cities.
It's a pity centrists gave up on vouchers. They would speed up reform dramatically. So would eliminating lotteries at charter schools. If markets were allowed to work, they could get us a lot closer to a solution. I doubt this. Here, most of our inner-city charter schools are doing even less than babysitting-- some were just shut down because they weren't even providing lunch regularly. Far less can they actually educate anyone. It looks remarkably like a wild-west scenario, with poorly regulated schools siphoning off money and then leaving the students poorly served.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
I agree, DeeDee, and truly-- I wanted to like the model for vouchers/charter schools. I really, really, REALLY did. I just don't believe that the majority of charters are anything more than for-profit money-making schemes at this point.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... I just don't believe that the majority of charters are anything more than for-profit money-making schemes at this point. There is good and bad everywhere. Just as a negative experience with a few teachers or gifted kids is best not generalized to all teachers, or gifted kids, the greed evident in some charters may best not be generalized to all charters. In casting a wider net to seek examples beyond our own personal experiences, some may wish to look at the organization greatschools which gathers and provides basic information on many schools, including public and charters. Greatschools also maintains a collection of articles which range in topic from gifted ed... to questions to ask and what to observe to ensure a good "fit"... to what to do when the teacher is a bully. There are also many books featuring schools which may be role models and provide inspiration for what is possible. Here is one such book, there are many others featured on the same amazon page http://www.amazon.com/No-Excuses-Lessons-High-Performing-High-Poverty/dp/0891950907/ Some charters have high graduation rates, and high rates of students going on to post-secondary education. While schools often stimulate competition among students as a means of keeping children striving to constantly improve their personal best, and tout this as great real-world experience, it seems ironic that some may not believe that same sense of competition among various educational institutions may keep the institutions striving to constantly improve themselves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 341
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 341 |
I feel great about dd's TAG school. It is seriously wonderful. The neighborhood school my ds was going to was nice. Pleasant teachers and principal, gave me what I asked for when I asked for it for ds, nice grounds, good families there. However, when a charter opened up nearby, we ran to it. His current class has 14 children, a full time teacher and a full time TA. They don't have the same kinds of resources that the public school has but they do so much more with the children.
I feel good about the public schools in my middle class town.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... 15 minute diatribe... I am so sorry for your child's negative experience. Yet I am so relieved that he could pinpoint and articulate his disappointment, and feel safe in expressing these deep negative feelings to you. The next phase after awareness and outrage may be apathy and underachievement. You may wish to rescue kiddo before further damage occurs from his non-learning environment. Many kids love to learn, and begin to loathe school when they correctly observe the school actively or passively thwarting learning. Many believe that focusing on encouraging the love of learning will naturally bring up performance and test results; Paradoxically focusing on bringing up test results may wither both the love of learning and subsequent student performance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
As Dude noted on the previous page, though-- the one real-world example that we have to work from is in higher ed. It hasn't worked appreciably well there, either. And one can definitely argue that the complicating factors associated with primary and secondary compulsory education are mostly missing from that picture, making it even simpler. Unfortunately, market theory only works when the assumptions underlying it are valid. Those assumptions are not necessarily valid here-- that is, that those who start charter schools are MOST concerned with quality as a means of competing, and that they are determined to "succeed" in terms of student-as-product, not student-as-consumer. The latter leads to the same place that it has in higher ed. Making students (as a demographic) "happy" is a very very far cry from doing a good job educating them. Not all students enjoy the process of learning, particularly when they are well accustomed to picking up trophies just for showing up. Higher ed has adjusted with ever-more-luxurious settings for students to 'learn' in, and watering down content to make them all FEEL smart (even in remedial coursework)... and that's the regular, NPO (public or private) side of things. The for-profit higher ed sector most resembles payday loan operations, quite frankly. While I respect that your opinion and mine differ here, indigo, I have been inside of a charter organization (and one that is reasonably reputable, I might add) for the past decade, and what I've seen is that they are INNATELY corrupt or at least corruptible upon success. They ultimately view the enterprise as a business, and don't care any more about students than Microsoft cares about its customers. Oh, sure-- they want the money to keep rolling in, all right, but that's NOT the same thing. My own charter organization has figured out that slick marketing covers a world of sins, because it doesn't MATTER if you have high turnover in students. As long as there is a fresh crop of them, you're set. Once a charter learns this basic truth, the jig is up for quality instruction. THAT is a waste of resources; rather like McDonald's serving filet mignon and worrying about what food critics will say. Once a charter is a "success" the decay seems almost inevitable. I also saw some of the first K-12 charter efforts in the state that I was a faculty member in over a decade ago. It's not really different than higher ed. It just isn't. The details and org charts may differ, but exactly the same pitfalls exist and for exactly the same reasons. Human beings want the easy route. Even when "easy" isn't right. They may SAY one thing, and do something quite different, even if it isn't rational-- that's where model and theory break down. As noted; I've really, really, really tried to view charters and vouchers as "the" solution. But I don't think that they are-- or CAN be, honestly. That model is too prone to abuses for financial gain. My own undergrad institution was a traditional teacher's college-- yes, the majors were "nice" people, and most of them earnest and passionate about teaching. They were also a group that mostly COULDN'T HANDLE the "majors" content. Even later, as a faculty member, there was a clear, bright line between our "teaching majors" and our "majors" in my department. I'd estimate about a 20 point IQ difference between the two distributions, myself. This was in a STEM domain, too. At least we tried to turn out students who would become competent high school science teachers. Some departmental requirements don't ask anything beyond sophomore level material of those people.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,032 |
What makes me particularly frustrated and upset is my son's nosedive with regard to his attitude to school and the adults in it. He went on a 15 minute diatribe the other day after I asked him if he wanted to learn about something. He screamed at me, "I don't want to LEARN about anything. Learning is the worst thing in the world and I hope that nobody on the planet ever has to learn anything ever. Learning is so horrible!"
I started to laugh. I thought that he was kidding because all DS loves to do is learn. Then I asked him what learning means. He said, "learning is what you do in school when you have to sit there all day and learn things that you already know. Learning is sitting and being bored and listening to grown ups talk about the most boring things and then they ignore you all day." Oh, dear. I should probably ask DS11 the same question. I've heard that 15-minute diatribe (it gets longer, the older he gets) so many times.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
In casting a wider net to seek examples beyond our own personal experiences, some may wish to look at the organization greatschools which gathers and provides basic information on many schools, including public and charters. Greatschools also maintains a collection of articles which range in topic from gifted ed... to questions to ask and what to observe to ensure a good "fit"... to what to do when the teacher is a bully. LOL. School grades just came out, and DD's previous institution earned a D. Greatschools.com gives it 4 stars. They feature only one user comment since 2009.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
Once a xxxxxxx is a "success" the decay seems almost inevitable. Agreed. I have taken the liberty of changing the word charter to xxxxxxx above because it may be applicable as a general statement: Some have seen doctors, dentists, schools of all types, and other institutions follow this path from success to hubris and demise. Some have observed that the presence of a balance of competing organizations may tend to sustain the length of time of true customer-oriented (or student-orientated, patient-oriented) service. To the degree this has applied to corporations, we have had strong anti-trust legislation, preventing the amassing of money, power, and control by monoliths. Some may ask whether what is needed may be more choices, not fewer?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Exactly, Dude. The problem with ratings sites (just in general terms) is that there are MOSTLY only two responses in "crowdsourcing" efforts like that. 1. REALLY angry people who are highly motivated for personal reasons to be negative-negative-negative (and if you look at Amazon reviews for pretty much anything, you get some idea what I'm driving at there-- a lot of the time, those reviews have NOTHING to do with the quality or suitability of a particular product, so much as the stupid assumptions of the person writing) 2. Paid shills who write such glowing commentary that it would be frankly delusional if it were real. By the way-- OUR school URGES parents to do #2, there, going so far as to offer up suggested verbiage and links to a variety of sites to post our "reviews." Really not kidding. That has been a recent phenomenon, since Pearson's acquisition. That's the problem, though-- an appealing, successful charter WILL get gobbled up by those who see dollar signs. we have had strong anti-trust legislation, preventing the amassing of money, power, and control by monoliths How's that been workin' out?
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2 |
While I respect that your opinion and mine differ here, indigo, I have been inside of a charter organization (and one that is reasonably reputable, I might add) for the past decade, and what I've seen is that they are INNATELY corrupt or at least corruptible upon success. They ultimately view the enterprise as a business, and don't care any more about students than Microsoft cares about its customers. Microsoft, Apple, Intel, and other tech companies are all for-profit companies, and the quality of their products has improved over the years. The profit motive is not inimical to serving the consumer, as you seem to think.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
School grades just came out, and DD's previous institution earned a D. Greatschools.com gives it 4 stars. They feature only one user comment since 2009. You raise a good point, no one source of data should be taken as definitive. For example, data may be old, institutions may be reluctant to share negative reviews out of concern for possible legal consequences, etc. Yet on balance the data you have found may raise a red flag, and encourage parents to visit the articles on choosing schools (what to observe, what to ask, what might be a good fit).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... anti-trust legislation... How's that been workin' out? Not perfectly. But let's not miss the larger point that businesses/organizations/schools/etc tend to improve when there is competition, thereby customers/consumers/patients/students/etc have a viable choice: to leave one and choose another. N'est-ce pas?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2 |
1. REALLY angry people who are highly motivated for personal reasons to be negative-negative-negative (and if you look at Amazon reviews for pretty much anything, you get some idea what I'm driving at there-- a lot of the time, those reviews have NOTHING to do with the quality or suitability of a particular product, so much as the stupid assumptions of the person writing) Since smart people should read books other smart people like, one way to choose books on Amazon is to prefer books where the majority of reviewers understand the difference between a review of a book and a review of their particular bookseller.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
We now return you to a discussion of government schools... might a change from grouping by chronological age, to flexible cluster grouping by readiness and ability, benefit both students and teachers?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Yes to Bostonian. Which is exactly why I love Amazon and used it as my example. I tend to look at both the recent reviews, the lowest rating reviews, and some of the three and four-star ones, which often have pro's AND con's associated.
Yelp and things like it don't (typically) encourage that much nuance. A star rating system without the commentary isn't very useful.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
blackcat, your state IS the one I was thinking about-- where charters have had the longest timeline for playing out.
There were "start-up" troubles right from the start in the system, but those were mostly about poor management by people who REALLY had their hearts in the right places. Then there was a golden period where things worked well administratively, and the same original players with great ideas and the purest of motivations were in charge of C&I...
and now, the endgame, with monetization being the underlying goal.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 954
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 954 |
The problem with charter is that their are each their own little fiefdom. Depending on the staff and administration that is present each year, you could have a radically different experience.
I feel like our charter is doing a decent job... better than the public school at accommodating our son. The local public (with amazing ratings, according to the state) said all the right things to us, but never actually seemed to help our son in ANY fashion. It was a hot mess.
~amy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
Microsoft, Apple, Intel, and other tech companies are all for-profit companies, and the quality of their products has improved over the years. Windows 8. 'Nuff said.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
Microsoft, Apple, Intel, and other tech companies are all for-profit companies, and the quality of their products has improved over the years. Windows 8. 'Nuff said. Oh dear. Don't even get me started on that train wreck.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 222 |
Microsoft, Apple, Intel, and other tech companies are all for-profit companies, and the quality of their products has improved over the years. Windows 8. 'Nuff said. Oh dear. Don't even get me started on that train wreck. Please don't get me started on this whole conversation. I really have too much to do today before the kids come home for the weekend, especially when someone started discussing market driven higher education. Let's take the one thing that the US was doing right in education and systematically tear it down.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Microsoft, Apple, Intel, and other tech companies are all for-profit companies, and the quality of their products has improved over the years. Windows 8. 'Nuff said. Oh dear. Don't even get me started on that train wreck. LOL-- even assuming that were true-- how exactly does a business model translate into education? Most people coming at that assume that STUDENTS are customers.Most educators will tell you that is flatly WRONG. Taxpayers and society are your customers. Your graduates are your "product." Students are participants in the process of generating a good product. They aren't "end-users."
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 17
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 17 |
Well, that doesn't say much about what happens when a child needs different CONTENT, though, does it? Which goes a long way to explaining why teachers resent and fear inquisitive and bright children more than they ever have before (and it was never awesome, let's face it). A mirroring effect can be observed in meetings with school administrators-- bright and inquisitive parents are not seen as "helpful partners" but as PROBLEMS to be "solved" or "eliminated." ^This on both counts. In my opinion, most teachers don't like smart kids and administrators view their equally smart parents as a problem. Intelligence is not desirable or attractive to the masses. I have held these viewpoints since I sent my three year old who could read, write and do basic math to preschool, and he was clearly despised by his teacher. It was obvious she preferred kids who would sit quietly and color not those who wanted to read to the other kids. As for my opinion of public school, let's just say it is not positive. I will go one step further and say the same goes for my opinion of the education system as a whole. I think it used to be true that you could buy a better education through a private school. I don't think this is the case anymore. I say this based on my observation of the education my kids have received in comparison to the education I received years ago. Times have changed, and not necessarily for the better.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,453
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,453 |
The public schools are a mirror of the society in which they exist as far as I can see. In US (and UK) society it seems that scholarship and academic excellence are not valued anymore.
Become what you are
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 156
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 156 |
We've seen both good and bad public school districts.
Our daughter went to Kindergarten in local district A, had a horrible experience and was extremely bored with what they were "teaching" her. We were discouraged from talking about acceleration options and when the discouragement did not work, we were given the run around all summer until being told "NO" the week before school started.
Side trip to a private school, where one grade skip was done.
Four years later, open enrolled to local district B. Here we found a district that is willing to listen to parents and look into acceleration options. One more grade skip, add in further subject acceleration, and last year they allowed her to take 3 high school classes while still in 8th grade.
What local district B does, in my opinion, is the easiest and cheapest way to deal with HG/PG kids - accelerate them (whole-sale, or subject only, or both). If testing says they are ready for 7th grade, but the calendar says they should be going into 6th - skip them into 7th. If they're ready for Algebra and Biology in 8th grade, send them to the high school (and let them take a world language while they're there). In fact, plan for this and make sure you have high school classes first thing in the morning that advanced middle schoolers might take, and arrange for a bus to go back to the middle school after second or third period. It amazes me how many districts don't do this. If you already have a classroom where Geometry is being taught, and you have a student ready for Geometry, put their behind in a desk in that classroom. If you do enough of this, there won't even be a stigma (or at least much less of one) attached to the kids being accelerated.
In our experience there are both good and bad districts out there. We got lucky that our state allows us to open enroll out of the bad one and into a nearby good one.
--S.F.
For gifted children, doing nothing is the wrong choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
I think it used to be true that you could buy a better education through a private school. I don't think this is the case anymore. Private schools can be less bad. Around here (Bay area, CA), public K-8 schools have short days, except on Wednesdays, when they have very short days (the kids go home after lunch). Private school buys you a school day that lasts until 3 or 3:15 every day, and no furlough days. Overall, this translates to one extra day per week compared to public schools. So they have ample time for things like art, music, science, and so on. They also have time for field trips (Alcatraz, the Beethoven museum, and a local art museum, for example). Of course, my public school education in the 70s and 80s looked just like this. At the same time, a lot of private schools still fall into the same bad thinking that hinders the public schools: fad mathematics, every child is gifted, rigor = more homework, and so on. A guy who grew up around here once told DH and I not to spend more money on a smaller house in a better school district because the success of the district was due to the parents more than to supposedly exceptional schools. Now that we've lived around here for a while and now that our eldest is a bit older (13), I see what he meant. In contrast to a few other people here, I do think it's possible to judge the US education system as a whole. This is primarily because of our consistently mediocre results on international exams like the PISA, the watering down of course content, the watering down of high school exit exams, and the high number of students who end up taking remedial classes in college. Sure, there are some good schools out there --- but there are more good parents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 156
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 156 |
the success of the district was due to the parents more than to supposedly exceptional schools. My experience very much agrees with this. When open enrolling to a neighboring district for middle school, 3 of the six middle schools were "full" and not accepting out of district students. Of course, those were the three schools with the highest test scores. So my daughter ended up at one of the "failing" schools, yet she absolutely thrived while there. From our observations, and comparing notes with friends who have kids in other schools, the curriculum, class opportunities, quality of teachers, and passion of the teachers were pretty much all the same. The biggest difference between the populations of the schools was parental involvement. At the failing schools, some parents don't even care if their kid goes to school. --S.F.
For gifted children, doing nothing is the wrong choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 17
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 17 |
Great points, Val.
I completely agree about parents. I am no longer paying for education for my children because they are intelligent and I am involved. Those are the factors that contribute most to their academic success.
I attended a private schools in the 80s and 90s, and my children attended private school for a few years starting in 2007. As a kid, I had half day Wednesdays where we left before lunch. We had art, music and Spanish where we not only did arts and crafts, sang and learned Spanish words but learned about art history and how to read music and about different cultures. My kids got out of school one hour early on Wednesdays but were getting a watered down education. Their art was just arts and crafts, they just sang in music class and there was no foreign language. This certainly contributed to my disillusionment.
I will say there was one year of private school for my children where they had an exceptional music teacher. This particular teacher fostered a love of music and introduced reading music. Both of my kids became interested in music after one year with this teacher and my son taught himself to play an instrument. More parent involvement and rock star teachers like this one music teacher are necessary to bolster our education system.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 848
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 848 |
We now return you to a discussion of government schools... might a change from grouping by chronological age, to flexible cluster grouping by readiness and ability, benefit both students and teachers? Yes. However, that would require such a paradigm shift in the public education system that I cannot believe it would ever happen. That said, we saw exactly what you described in our former town's Montessori school. It worked very well, but the school was small and many people want a big school and associated amenities for their children. Thus the school struggles financially most years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 848
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 848 |
To answer the original question, I feel sad about, discouraged, confused and frustrated by the public school system. I do not, however, have personal experience with it as a parent, because it has not yet been a viable option for our PG son, even before we knew he was PG.
Montessori worked when he had an excellent primary teacher, didn't work so well when one teacher he had wasn't following the true tenets of the method. I still believe there is much about that approach that could benefit the majority of children. When we relocated last year, we were scared off by a very highly rated public school system that didn't have anything G&T until third grade. Follow being oversold a pricey private school that functions very well for within the box children, but with an administrator who could stand in for any of the Wicked Witches. Now at a private, parochial school with a fantastic principal who truly moves obstacles to help every child, from what we have seen.
My biggest concern when I reflect on our experiences so far, as well as my own in the P.S. system, is that quality and flexibility truly do come right down to the individual principal and then to the classroom teacher. Without both being very smart and dedicated, we don't get much.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
We now return you to a discussion of government schools... might a change from grouping by chronological age, to flexible cluster grouping by readiness and ability, benefit both students and teachers? Yes. However, that would require such a paradigm shift in the public education system that I cannot believe it would ever happen. That said, we saw exactly what you described in our former town's Montessori school. It worked very well, but the school was small and many people want a big school and associated amenities for their children. Thus the school struggles financially most years. I have the opposite view. The fiscal reality is that, in most of the developed world, demographic change will necessitate a shift in resources away from programs serving the young toward end-of-life support. Like it or not, the public is going to have a bitter pill to swallow in making choices about what to prioritize. Sadly, voters tend to be myopic and cut value-generating resources at the expense of consumption. In my province in Canada, education will butt heads with our sacred cow, public healthcare. Because boomers carry the political clout, and health costs are expected to consume 70% of every dollar of public revenue in 5 years, we can read between the lines about what the priorities are. It ain't special education! Gifted public programs are being shuttered faster than you can say "inequality". Economies of scale are needed to make ability-grouping viable, and public schools have scale in spades. Schools are averse to change when it means rallying new resources, but ability-grouping leverages pre-existing resources more efficiently to better meet the needs of all students. So while I agree it's a total paradigm shift, I believe the fiscal backstory makes disruptive change in public education necessary for its survival.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
Economies of scale are needed to make ability-grouping viable, and public schools have scale in spades. Schools are averse to change when it means rallying new resources, but ability-grouping leverages pre-existing resources more efficiently to better meet the needs of all students. So while I agree it's a total paradigm shift, I believe the fiscal backstory makes disruptive change in public education necessary for its survival. Agreed. Flexible cluster grouping by readiness and ability (rather than chronological age) places more reasonable demands on teachers for differentiated instruction while offering greater learning opportunity to students. Everyone benefits.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
I don't want to naively beleive that my kid's will suddenly get a good education just by going somewhere else, then be disappointed once again. There is good and bad in everything. Learning the weaknesses, not to hyper focus on them as a stumbling block, but to understand where our own abilities as parents can compensate/offset/complement the education experience our children receive in any given setting, is key. Resetting our emotional compass during/after a stressful exploration of options with a school, maintaining a growth (not fixed) mindset, role-modeling resilience, striving to understand the constraints within which the opposition is operating... all provide great life lessons for our kids. ... budget... can't get property tax levies to pass here (too many old people with no kids). If there are "too many old people with no kids" in most public school districts, where would you have these grandparents go? May we consider the possibility that the "old people with no kids" include boomers who, upon reflecting on their own "cookie cutter" educations, created a plethora of educational options, research, and legislation available for families today? Might we appreciate the many benefits they have provided which are ongoing? Might these families have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes and referenda to support the local public schools over their lifetime? Might they essentially be living in their piggy banks, their homes being their last asset? If the economy improved and there were young families with steady jobs looking to purchase existing homes at the assessed values (upon which property taxes are based), might these empty nesters be willing to sell? If you did not have "too many old people with no kids" living in your district, what demographic would live there instead, and where are they now? Do they have the financial means to purchase these homes, plus pay higher property taxes than are now levied? Across the nation, as baby boomers retire or are downsized to face an early retirement with no pensions and 401(k) accounts which may have lost half of their value or more during the economic downturn, these grandparents may see the high risk or folly of continuing to tax at ever increasing rates for budgets which are not balanced but create ever increasing deficits for the next generation to pay. There may be wisdom to be gleaned from their financial perspective, before their fate becomes our own. What percentage of your income are you willing to pay in taxes throughout your lifespan? When you no longer have an income, but are required to continue paying taxes, you will be paying over 100%. When one is paying out more than one is taking in, there is a budget deficit. Our government is in this situation by design; many "old people with no kids" are in this situation despite having planned differently. Education reform, improving efficiency & efficacy, may yield longer-lasting educational benefits than increasing taxes. One example may be flexible cluster grouping by readiness and ability in each subject, rather than grouping by chronological age.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
DD is in a cluster group with 3 other kids identified as "gifted" and it's not working. The teacher's idea of working with the cluster group is to give them "enrichment packets" for math. She doesn't meet with the group or instruct them. Sorry, no. From your description, she is grouped by chronological age. A pull-out group is not the same, no matter whether they call it a "cluster group" to try to sell it. This is not the same as flexible cluster grouping by readiness and ability without regard to chronological age. There is as sharp a contrast here as there is between "differentiation" meaning "differentiated instruction" or expectation of "differentiation in work products/output", without benefit of instruction. Cluster and differentiation are among the many buzzwords which can mean almost anything.. therefore obfuscate the educational experience... rather than providing transparency and managing expectations.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
What she is doing is better than nothing but it's not what I was expecting at all. Some may emphasize the importance of asking the questions, whose answers will manage our expectations. The school district that I'm hoping I can get my kids into says that approx. 30 percent of kids are working a grade level ahead in math. They don't need to be sent to a different grade, they are just grouped together and work ahead on the curriculum. You may wish to find out how that may be different than what your daughter is experiencing now. Based upon your description, some questions may include - how often does the group gather? is there differentiated instruction? who leads the instruction? are children allowed/encouraged/supported/instructed to work ahead?...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
Why can't they ability-group the kids for math and send the high kids to one teacher, the middle to another, and the lowest to the third. Then they could even break it up further and have 2 or 3 different groups within a group. It could be flexible so if a kid makes progress they can move to a higher class. If they are not, they can move downward to a lower group. It wouldn't cost any money--all the teachers would need to do is schedule math at the same time. Operating within the current paradigm of sorting children first by chronological age, this may not receive broad support... Teachers may be evaluated based upon student performance as an indicator of teacher efficacy, therefore some unions may preclude the grouping of students who may naturally perform better, as this may been seen to give an advantage to those teachers. This has created a teacher-centric (or union-centric) system. Remove chronological age, sort by readiness and ability, and the process becomes student-centric.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
Just some things to think about... ... only about 30 percent of households have school-aged children... Continuing from our previous posts earlier in this thread... Where would you have the 70% of your local population move to, who are households without school-aged children (empty-nesters, grandparents, childless couples, etc)? No matter where they live, they are in someone's public school district. Why not allow them to stay in the community which they helped to build up through their tax dollars over the years? ... Since there are so few children, it shouldn't cost very much to give them a high-quality education. This sounds like a point in favor of the opposition; The 70% of your local population without school-age children who are not voting to increase tax levies, may say this. ... the State has basically not increased funding at all over the years for education In the scenario you indicated, as baby boomers and their echo-boom of children age, there may be a smaller number of pupils in many districts nationwide... which may often indicate the same number of tax dollars is being utilized to educate fewer pupils... therefore there are more dollars available per pupil. ... despite rising costs... There are fixed costs and variable costs. Looking at a particular district's budget, attending school board meetings, and examining your State's Department of Education data found online may be ways to identify and analyze costs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... I want them to vote for the levy. I voted for school levies before I had children (and we didn't know if we'd ever have children). So why aren't people voting for it? They can't think of anyone besides themselves? Earlier in this thread, when you mentioned having "too many old people with no kids" living in your public school district, I summarized and shared several thoughts I've become aware of, from the opposition view point who seem to match this demographic. (link- http://giftedissues.davidsongifted....o_you_feel_about_the_p.html#Post172782As) ... wealthy as this district is, it is nonsensical. Not knowing your district or the actual wealth of residents there, nor whether the wealth of "old people with no kids" is being drained by medical issues, I cannot further illuminate for you what the opposing view(s) may be. ... spending $1k-2K less per pupil than other districts. Some of this cost may depend upon the teacher salary and benefit costs, also possibly the tenure and relative experience of teachers. Costs may be found in school district budgets, and at the Department of Education. ... They are going to go to a 4-day school week, close one of the schools, cut the music program, cut busing so kids will be walking across the highways, etc. Districts may list the most dramatic potential cuts in attempt to pass a levy, and when a levy does not pass they may make other cuts which have less impact upon students. The sharing of worst case scenario is sometimes seen as a scare tactic. Again, looking at costs may prove helpful.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14 |
I post this as a mom of a gifted child and also as a public school teacher. I am very grateful for the magnet program that my daughter participates in, but I do not expect it to meet every need for her. It gives her not only a wonderful foundation, but extends her and provides her such an amazing peer group. But like every child, mine is unique and no one knows her and all her interests that she wants to pursue like I do. That's where I come in. It is my job to provide her additional help where she is challenged and it is my job to enable her to pursue her interests in such a way that enhances her education and her whole being. Absolutely, the teacher can help with weaknesses and use her strengths to extend her, but a teacher is just part of the picture.
As a teacher, I can tell you that it is incredibly challenging to differentiate in current constraints. Funding has been cut so much that we have zero planning time. It is a struggle to keep our heads above water and adapt to common core standards (which I love.) I come in to work super early in the morning so that I can work on planning and paperwork, attend IEP, 504 and Student Study Team meetings. I work through recess and lunch with students, providing them extra help (be it emotional or academic).
Unless you have ever been a special education teacher it is very challenging to imagine the inherent ADD that goes along with the job. There is always something or someone requiring your attention, be it something to be done, or a student, fellow teacher, parent, aide or administrator. It is very challenging to work through the day without a quiet moment. There is literally always someone in your face at all times. I consider special education to be very similar to gifted education, just at another end of the spectrum. I adore working with my students and I love my relationships with both them and their parents.
In a perfect world teachers would have scheduled times for planning that would help them better prepare lessons that include differentiation. It would help provide us time to communicate not only with other teachers, but with you. And lastly, it would provide us with more one on one time with your children.
To be honest, I send out e-mails regularly to parents in which I tell them that their child is not doing required work and I ask them to please monitor and help ensure homework does get done at home. If a child needs additional help in understanding, we offer it. I cannot tutor a child after school with their homework simply because a parent does not. After school I turn into a mother of my own child. That's why I put my extra work in on the front end. However, most schools do offer Homework Clubs etc. to help on this. Unfortunately, most struggling students and their parents do not take advantage of it.
Education is a partnership. Public schools are not perfect and nor are many parents. You figure out what works for your family in the best interests of your child and you do it. It's not a one-way street. A little love goes a long way - in so many different ways.
Last edited by edina; 10/26/13 04:05 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
Why can't they ability-group the kids for math and send the high kids to one teacher, the middle to another, and the lowest to the third. Then they could even break it up further and have 2 or 3 different groups within a group. It could be flexible so if a kid makes progress they can move to a higher class. If they are not, they can move downward to a lower group. It wouldn't cost any money--all the teachers would need to do is schedule math at the same time. Operating within the current paradigm of sorting children first by chronological age, this may not receive broad support... Teachers may be evaluated based upon student performance as an indicator of teacher efficacy, therefore some unions may preclude the grouping of students who may naturally perform better, as this may been seen to give an advantage to those teachers. This has created a teacher-centric (or union-centric) system. Remove chronological age, sort by readiness and ability, and the process becomes student-centric. In our school, when the topic of sorting all children by ability and not age has come up, there have always been 2 responses: it's racist/classist and it's not fair to the bottom performing children because they will know that they are "less than" and their self esteem will be hurt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 351 |
[i]As a teacher, I can tell you that it is incredibly challenging to differentiate in current constraints.[/i]
Yes it is, and as an educator myself, I have always supported ability grouping. Our school will not group by ability and so they continue to claim that they are differentiating when they clearly are not. Honestly, no one really wants them to differentiate anyway. It's too difficult and it's never done properly.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
I wonder when it stopped because all of the schools I attended in the 70's-80's did ability grouping. They did mix up ages but only for 6th and 7th grade for some reason. With the other grades they kept the ability grouping within the grade. Homeroom teachers of course had kids of all different abilities, but the kids rotated around and went different places depending on the subject. So I was with one group of kids for math and a different group of kids for reading (I was considered advanced for reading but not for math). I never thought negatively about myself for being in a lower math group or the second lowest gym group. I don't think I thought much about it at all. In a way, it was a relief being with kids at a similar level--in gym for instance. Who wants to play sports with kids who are way more advanced?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14 |
[i]As a teacher, I can tell you that it is incredibly challenging to differentiate in current constraints.[/i]
Yes it is, and as an educator myself, I have always supported ability grouping. Our school will not group by ability and so they continue to claim that they are differentiating when they clearly are not. Honestly, no one really wants them to differentiate anyway. It's too difficult and it's never done properly. I totally agree.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... when the topic of sorting all children by ability and not age has come up, there have always been 2 responses: it's racist/classist and it's not fair to the bottom performing children because they will know that they are "less than" and their self esteem will be hurt. Might objections be based on the older practice of "tracking" in which students were locked in to one performance level throughout their school careers? Steady improvements in identifying/addressing LD/2e issues have enabled students to make dramatic academic gains after a breakthrough. Similarly, developments in technology have provided adaptive assessments which may aid in flexible clustering. ... with one group of kids for math and a different group of kids for reading (I was considered advanced for reading but not for math). I never thought negatively about myself for being in a lower math group or the second lowest gym group. I don't think I thought much about it at all. In a way, it was a relief being with kids at a similar level--in gym for instance. Who wants to play sports with kids who are way more advanced? Ditto. Beyond anecdotes, there is research to back this up. One link here- http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/kulik.html, to an article titled "An Analysis of the Research on Ability Grouping: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives", authored by James A. Kulik, 1992: ... Self-esteem of lower aptitude students rises slightly...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 52
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 52 |
I'm curious for those unhappy with the public schools, whether your school districts have a high or low percent of gifted kids. All 3 of my kids are in the gifted program (hard cutoff of 130 WISC scores, although I'm sure some parents of kids in the 128-130 range have successfully lobbied for entrance), but only one would meet DYS. Our school district has an usually large gifted population (at least 10% of the kids in each of their 3 grades are in the gifted program, with closer to 15% for my youngest).
I don't feel our school district is perfect, but we've been generally happy and they have been open to our requests. The vast majority of teachers we've had are good with differentiated instruction and have worked with our kids to address their strengths/weaknesses. Sure, there's lots of bureaucracy, but at all levels -- from teacher to principal to district-wide curriculum heads -- they clearly care about the kids and want to make things work.
But again, we're pretty much a MG family and my DYS-level kid is a pleaser and happy-go-lucky.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
I'm curious... whether your school districts have a high or low percent of gifted kids... Some districts have quotas. For example, the top 15% of achievers will be dubbed gifted, mirroring the ethnic composition of the school population. In this example, if there are 100 kids in a grade level there will be 15 in the gifted program. If the 100 pupils in this grade level consist of five ethnicities... 20 Latin American or South American pupils, 20 Native American pupils, 20 Middle Eastern or Asian American pupils, 20 African American pupils, and 20 European American pupils, each of these five groups will be equally represented: The three highest achievers from each demographic will be chosen. While some believe this is fair/equal/equitable, both a child who cannot keep up and a child who is bored with the slow pace of gen ed may not benefit by this arrangement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,640 Likes: 2 |
Some districts have quotas. For example, the top 15% of achievers will be dubbed gifted, mirroring the ethnic composition of the school population. Yes, as documented in this post: http://giftedexchange.blogspot.com/2011/07/making-numbers-come-out-right.htmlMaking the Numbers Come Out Right by Laura Vanderkam Gifted Exchange Blog FRIDAY, JULY 01, 2011 Different IQ cutoffs for different races to achieve proportionality is racial discrimination. I oppose this, as do most Americans, according to opinion polls on racial preferences.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Other districts also have identification procedures SO lax that pretty much anyone whose parents are determined enough can have their child identified as "gifted" and this also has the side benefit of allowing administrators to say (with a straight face) that "all of our coursework* is differentiat-ed/-able" as a reason why no additional differentiation is possible for children at high LOG. *Well, it would be with some 30% of the students in the district identified as GT, wouldn't it? Yeah-- there's no programming past regular "gifted" either, and most of THAT is comprised of not-really-rigorous-or-challenging fun or artsy extracurricular enrichment run by a group of cliquey parents who apparently have not only too much time on their hands, but far too much $ as well, and are determined to invest in their kids' status. Parenting: the Competitive Martha Stewart Edition, if you will. Genuine highly gifted or advanced material? Just doesn't exist. One does encounter the mind-boggling proposition that there's no difference between a student who scores 95th percentile on a grade-level achievement test and one who scores 99th percentile on an out-of-level one like the SAT or EXPLORE. But I may just not understand this properly. Yes, that's the only thing that makes sense of this... While I might well believe that 5% of the district population is top 1-2% given that we live in a Silicon Forest college town, no WAY do I buy that 30% of them have "special" educational needs by virtue of high ability. See, if there WERE that many (and there aren't) then the district would be running a sort of informal magnet school, which isn't the case, judging from what DD's local friends do in school. Her gifted friends, I might add. LOL. Some of them are actually MG to HG-- and they are bored spitless. This is how public education works here in Lake Wobegon. Because statistics are just so-- harsh.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... fun or artsy extracurricular enrichment run by a group of cliquey parents who apparently have not only too much time on their hands, but far too much $ as well, and are determined to invest in their kids' status... This is how public education works here in Lake Wobegon. Because statistics are just so-- harsh. "... Lake Wobegon, where all the women are strong... and all the children are above average." - Garrison Keillor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
The district that I'm thinking of open enrolling my kids into doesn't even identify kids as "gifted". So we would be going from a district where DD is one of the kids identified as gifted and in a gifted cluster to a district with no official gifted program (and it's not 10 or 30 percent in the current district--she is one of 4 in her grade of 80). However, the district with no gifted program says they take the MAP scores and other data and they simply put kids into the right level. Hence, there are 30 percent of kids working a year ahead in math. With reading they do the same thing (supposedly). I don't care about the "gifted" label. Is there a reason it really matters? I just want them to do work at the right level for their abilities. Yeah, I don't really care about the label either-- but the point is that in any district that is identifying 10-20% (or more, as in my own) as "gifted" but then doing nothing for those students (because apparently regular programming is "sufficient" for all of them), well, that seems to be about parents and not student needs. What does that kind of district do with students who NEED to be 3-4-5 years ahead in math (or anything else)? And are they actually working +1y? Or is it just lip service? Because I've seen that particular bait-and-switch, too. Here, it is mostly about letting Tiger Parents feel tigerish. On the plus side, I suppose that it does do some nice things in terms of protecting MG and bright-MG-ish children from their well-meaning parents without actually engaging in harming those children as much as their parents (evidently) would like. So there is that. Personally, I think that I would rather that they just educated all the kids according to their evident needs, and forgot about labeling altogether. Same difference.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
The district that I'm thinking of open enrolling my kids into doesn't even identify kids as "gifted"... However... they take the MAP scores and other data and they simply put kids into the right level. Hence, there are 30 percent of kids working a year ahead in math. With reading they do the same thing (supposedly). On the one hand, this sounds reasonable and quite natural. On the other hand... - it may be strictly achievement based therefore a kiddo who may be underachieving may never receive a challenge worthy of their potential? - is there a cap at working one year ahead? Or may children progress at their own pace? - do children work alone or become acquainted with intellectual peers with whom they may sometimes work? - a gifted kid with their own unique (often quite complex) way of seeing things may have unusual questions... to accommodate children working in various levels, are the lessons computer based? - if lessons are computer based, are there accommodations/modifications/supports for LD/2e, or do all children work through the same curriculum? (is the computer seen as providing the accommodations/modifications?) - is this a flipped classroom? These are just a few questions which parents may wish to know to the answers to before committing. ... DD is one of the kids identified as gifted and in a gifted cluster... she is one of 4 in her grade of 80... Some might say a weekly parent-volunteer-led pullout is not a cluster? ... I don't care about the "gifted" label... I just want them to do work at the right level for their abilities. Agreed. Focusing on meeting student needs, rather than seeking prestige, status, or elitism may benefit many students.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 312
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 312 |
Do you feel positive? Negative? Neutral? Disillusioned?
What I want to know, is it like this everywhere? Are there school districts/schools that are actually good and kids get their needs met? How do you feel? Disillusioned! Absolutely!!!! You would think educators would be better trained in dealing with both ends of the bell curve, and we naively thought they would be happy to work with someone on the high end - how fun should that be to really be able to challenge a bright kid; a kid that loves to learn? We were wrong - they don't get it at all! We always hope someone will appear that "gets it", but so far that person hasn't arrived. Our gifted teacher is close. She is obviously gifted herself, and raised her own gifted children, but she isn't one to speak up and suggest things, even if she knows it would help. If we suggest something she will jump on board, but she wants to keep a good working relationship with the administrators and teachers, so she won't ever rock the boat. She also has a strong concern about making DD stand out too much and then end up an outcast. I agree to an extent, but DD still has educational needs, that I don't think can be completely fulfilled through her gifted pullout alone. I think it is a matter of educating the educators and it can't come from us parents because we have too big a stake to be neutral and believable. If someone could teach them that gifted kids do have needs beyond what regular education can give them, then I think we might see a difference. Educators have been actually taught that those at the lower end of the curve need help and accommodations, but they aren't taught about the upper part of the curve. I went through a very good teacher ed program and received my degree and certification, and I don't ever recall hearing anything about gifted ed. We have had NCLB for so long now, giving the lower end the most significance, and I have no problem with that, but the higher end needs some attention now too! I also have to be completely honest and admit - if I was not the parent of gifted children, and had not been through all that we have been through, I would not really care about gifted education and would not understand the need for anything different than what was already in place. That is just the honest truth. I see that as another issue entirely - parents of "regular ed" children don't get it either and don't really care. Most of them would not be on our side in a fight for change, but I bet some of them would stand up for the kids at the lower end just because it seems more obvious that they need the help. We have had several fundraisers in our area this school year already for different causes (again I don't have an issue with this and my family freely participates in whatever is going on in our community) but can you imagine what kind of a turnout we would get if we did a fundraiser for gifted education? I don't know if that came out right or not and I hope I didn't offend anyone - just my thoughts and opinion. Maybe I'm wrong, or maybe I am just disillusioned.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 358
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 358 |
We started our DS 10 in 5th grade in a private school this year. So far it is wonderful, just a few snags we ironed out. It is a school for gifted kids and they are pretty serious about their responsibilities.
Our story is not unlike many here. We just thought the risk was to high to trust the public schools. They did a wonderful job with us for the first 3 years. They subject accelerated 2 years ahead. But they ran out of resources. They were all for skipping grades, subject acceleration, compacting, but that is not always the answer.
So for my DS and for now I do not feel good about the public education system in our area.
I bought 4 years with the private school. I can take a breath for now. I hope.
Last edited by mecreature; 10/31/13 11:19 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 393
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 393 |
Indigo- Something you said, really hit home with me: how if the school challenges only on achievement, an underachiever may be missed.
My ds hates simple math computation, and makes careless mistakes. Thus, on his achievement tests, his score is lower in this area. That means no math differentiation. Trying to get him to understand that is very hard. I had hoped the teacher would realize this, but she hasn't.
The more I think, the more I am coming to terms with our local public school is not going to work out for my ds.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
...if the school challenges only on achievement, an underachiever may be missed... careless mistakes. You've nailed it. It's as though the gifted brain seeks challenge and thrives on complexity, turning "on" in the presence of a challenge worthy of its potential, "off" for routine, mundane, mind-numbing repetition. These kids may pick up on higher level concepts, almost able to see the patterns and finish the teacher's sentences, or they may ask unusual questions about applying what they are learning, different ways or methods which may work for solving the problem, finishing a story, etc... they may seem truly out-of-step and be forced to "hide" their thought processes in the classroom. They need their families to be a soft place to land, a place where they can receive validation and affirmation. Teachers may sometimes over-rely on these kids to answer questions when the rest of the class is lost, and even to tutor other students. Teachers may also sandbag these students, making an example of them by calling on them in class while the child is working ahead in attempt to keep their mind engaged and active without disrupting the class, talking with others, etc. Even the best behaved, most composed, outwardly compliant, and self-disciplined gifted students may exert tremendous effort to remain so, often by learning to keep their mind occupied: They may be multi-tasking, strategizing, and making mental connections while monitoring the class or performing rote tasks. Rather than being assessed for the reach of their depth/breadth of knowledge, comprehension, and their ability to explain things in other terms which builds a bridge of understanding for students the teacher was unable to make things clear to... they may often be assessed according to a careless mistake on the simplest of items. They may receive low placement and pacing, and be locked-in and labeled for careless errors, beginning a downward negative spiral in performance/achievement and self-esteem. These kids may be at risk for dropping out of school and society. This is why we advocate for gifted kids: They simply deserve a chance, an opportunity to learn at a level of challenge worthy of their potential. Despite careless mistakes. Here is an interesting article from the Maryland Coalition for Gifted and Talented Education (MCGATE) about one individual's preconceptions and even misconceptions in identifying gifted kids http://mcgate.org/103/, and an article from Duke TIP mentioning careless errors and underachievement http://tip.duke.edu/node/723. Many more articles may found with search engines.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 393
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 393 |
Indigo- wow. Thank you for this. I am looking forward to share with my dh.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
... looking forward to share with my dh. You may also like the book, "A Parent's Guide to Gifted Children" if you are not already familiar with it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 137
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 137 |
As the parent of a gifted 3rd grader, I'm disheartened. I'm tired of fighting the same battle every year, and losing.
As a high school teacher, I'm also disheartened. I'm actually a fan of the new Common Core. As they're written (at least ELA, which is what I teach), they're really focused, good standards that get to the heart of what kids should know. It's the scripted curricula and publishing packages, I think, that are giving it a bad name.
However, the focus in my state is more and more on rigid, data-driven processes that lead to standardized testing. I spend a lot of time crunching numbers and devising BS assessments, instead of going back to those Common Core standards and refining my curriculum and assessments in a meaningful way. I'm one of those teachers that tries very hard to relate to and address my students as individual human beings, so being forced to be so data-driven is difficult for me, especially when there are only so many hours in the day. Other than her critique of Common Core, which I don't agree with, I am really on board with what Diane Ravitch said in her interview on the Daily Show this past week.
I'm also disheartened as an educator and a former gifted student and the parent of a gifted kid because I know that when teachers are stretched too thin, it's the gifted kids who lose out. It takes time and effort (and, let's be honest here, intellect) to design good and meaningful extension work for gifted kids, but when I'm scrambling to meet the IEPs of my special ed kids (none of whom are 2E, by the way), and trying to crunch data, and working to refine my curriculum and lesson plans to meet both the Common Core and the initiative du jour as dictated by my state or my local administration, and grading all of those essays (I teach English), and oh yeah, taking care of my own small children, it seems that the gifted kids fall by the wayside. It's a constant source of guilt for me.
Stacey. Former high school teacher, back in the corporate world, mom to 2 bright girls: DD12 & DD7.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 978
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 978 |
"How do you feel about the public school system?"
...meh.
Underfunded, with curriculum that's too broad and shallow. Unless your child gets the right teacher, it's kind of a waste of time imo.
Last edited by CCN; 11/01/13 11:20 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 423
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 423 |
Disillusioned! Absolutely!!!! You would think educators would be better trained in dealing with both ends of the bell curve, and we naively thought they would be happy to work with someone on the high end - how fun should that be to really be able to challenge a bright kid; a kid that loves to learn? This may be one of the most largely ignored and unrealized truths about education, that we "assume" that teachers are well prepared by college to teach a broad range of learning capabilities and learning styles. Rarely if ever do I hear ANY talk about teacher education reform, only reform of educating our children. It's almost impossible to have the later without the former. I remember talking with my wife about this subject, she's a public school teacher with 31 years experience. She said when she went to college for education, they only were required to take ONE class on teaching methodology....ONE. They also had no education on how to involve parents in their own child's learning nor did they get any education / coaching on how to talk with parents who had concerns.....is it any wonder then we view the vast majority of teachers as unable to complete the work they're hired for in an acceptable manner?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,007
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,007 |
I remember talking with my wife about this subject, she's a public school teacher with 31 years experience. She said when she went to college for education, they only were required to take ONE class on teaching methodology....ONE. They also had no education on how to involve parents in their own child's learning nor did they get any education / coaching on how to talk with parents who had concerns.....is it any wonder then we view the vast majority of teachers as unable to complete the work they're hired for in an acceptable manner? Teaching is a currently low-status occupation that is perceived as a place where less intelligent people go to have a stable job because they have to go somewhere and do something.
Last edited by JonLaw; 11/06/13 07:24 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,228 |
My experience:
Positive: Ability grouping so that the top group (top 15%-20%) could reach e.g. calculus by grade 10. Classes in general were interesting and we were learning new things.
Negative: Violence.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
Many of the elementary teachers (general ed) in our district are being paid close to $80k! We are not in NYC or California, we're in the Midwest. Considering the amount of vacation time and time off each year, I find this to be an outrageous amount of money. If people actually did a good job and were highly skilled and trained, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But that's not really what we're experiencing. I get the feeling teachers who are on top of the longevity scale know that it would take A LOT for them to lose their jobs. So after a while they relax a little too much. They DO have difficult jobs--I would not want to manage a room of 26 unruly children, many with disorders/special needs. But I have a problem even getting teachers to communicate with me or address my concerns. Everyone talks about how teachers are not paid enough, and if we would only pay more, our kids would get a better education. I think that we should pay GOOD teachers more, not the ones who have been around for 20 years and are tired and sick of it, and continue to do the job so they can collect their pension. The question is--how do we figure out who the good teachers are?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 669
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 669 |
My dh is getting paid half of that here in FL as a teacher. We live in the wrong area. We qualify for reduced lunch.
...reading is pleasure, not just something teachers make you do in school.~B. Cleary
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
On how to separate the good teachers...
- Create an incentive structure that rewards ability, not tenure or compliance with unions. Don't include, or minimize, an automatic tenure elevator beyond COLAs. - Allow variation in pay and bonuses at the individual level. - Focus key performance indicators on both inputs to teaching (e.g. continuing education credits in teachable subjects, new curriculum development, etc.) and outputs (test scores, change in student rankings year over year) - Use 360 degree evaluations that incorporate at least a small random sample of parents and students - Incorporate cameras into classrooms to facilitate random observation by principal and school psychologist...an idea that I haven't fully decided I like, but it would reduce agency problems
Last edited by aquinas; 11/07/13 01:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Here's my current gripe about the school system-- 2e-specific. In order to ensure that students with disabilities have equal access to the school program, Section 504 requires that schools provide accommodations. So, if a student with a disability needed an accommodation or related aids and services to participate in the field trip, those services must be provided. For example, in Quaker Valley (PA) Sch. Dist., 39 IDELR 235 (OCR 1986), a girl with a neurodegenerative disorder that affected her motor, sensory, perceptual, and language functioning was denied the opportunity to go on field trips and participate in a swimming program. Due to “safety concerns”, the school principal had unilaterally made the decision to exclude her from six field trips with her third grade class, including a trip to a television station. She was the only student excluded from the field trips. In school the girl was provided with accommodations, such as an escort to assist her when walking and holding her hand. But no consideration was given to providing similar accommodations on the field trips or in the swimming program. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) determined that the “safety” considerations were not justified and that the girl should have been provided with accommodations to ensure her participation in the field trips and the swimming program. Additionally, OCR determined the school district violated Section 504 because it did not notify the girl’s parents of the upcoming field trips, while the other children’s’ parents were notified. On the other hand, OCR has found that there are times when schools, after individual consideration, may exclude a student from a field trip if the student’s participation presents an unacceptable risk to the student’s health or safety. But the school must be able to justify that determination. In North Hunterdon (MD) Pub. Sch. Sys., 25 IDELR 165 (OCR 1996), OCR determined that the school district was justified in excluding a student from a field trip when the student had several seizures on the same day as the field trip. Well, the above pretty much sums up why I think it is a ridiculous waste of time to teach pigs to sing. Clearly I'm merely annoying them, since I've been trying to wrestle this sucker to the ground for about 8 years at this point. You know that they just don't get it when field trips are announced with disclaimers about your child's disabling condition making them "not a good idea" or with admonishment to "be careful" because hazards will be present. The latter with a sly, mocking tone, indicating that the teacher writing it thinks quite little of the legitimacy of my child's very real hidden disability... By the way, it's not even been five years since national counsel helped me put these people into a headlock over pervasive non-inclusive and dangerous field trip policies that were endemic and systematic. They (and we) introduced a VERY carefully crafted statement that went along with ALL field trip announcements, only this year, apparently, there is now a push to do an end-run around it. ONLY my child's disability is mentioned. ONLY hers. I've looked. And you'd better believe I've documented it. Niiiice. REAL nice. What is that? Is that retaliation because we told them no more using us for marketing?? Is THAT it? Because don't think that OCR isn't going to get print-outs of screenshots over this. I've HAD it with these turkeys.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 417
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 417 |
Our district's average teacher salary is right in line with what Blackcat is reporting. Yet my child cannot get an education from this system that we are heavily paying for. I agree that money does not solve the problem. It really frustrates me that poor teachers are promoted and retained in our current system and that I am left having to home school my child with none of the funds that should be spent on his growth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 417
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 417 |
Wow HK! That is awful!! I truly hope some good comes of the battle you have waged.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
I would love to know what percentage of teachers are fired for incompetency or unprofessional behavior compared to those in other professions. It really does seem to take a terrible teacher for any action to take place. And principals seem to back up teachers more often than concerned parents (take sides w/ the teacher rather than the parents or child if an incident happens).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
I would love to know what percentage of teachers are fired for incompetency or unprofessional behavior compared to those in other professions. It really does seem to take a terrible teacher for any action to take place. And principals seem to back up teachers more often than concerned parents (take sides w/ the teacher rather than the parents or child if an incident happens). Probably no more or less than I've seen in any public or private sector job. Turnover isn't usually a positive for an organization, because the idiot who knows your organization is usually better than the idiot who doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
And principals seem to back up teachers more often than concerned parents (take sides w/ the teacher rather than the parents or child if an incident happens). Or, alternatively, the principal thinks that the teacher is a highly skilled and that the complaining parent is full of it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
Of course. Parents are just out to "get" teachers. Everyone knows that is their main goal. You know that you're dealing with troublemakers when they show up with ""data"" and peer-reviewed literature about something. Ha.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309 |
I had the exact same feeling as blackcat. When my older child started school we were all excited, he was excited, we were looking forward to a good educational experience because we were in a very good district with lots of highly educated parents and a strong emphasis on academics, and because my son had a very positive experience during preschool--the teachers really understood him and his needs. Things weren't too bad in K and grade 1. Then we moved to another state, another town with lots of highly educated parents and a strong emphasis on academics, and a supposedly superb district. Then starting from second grade things have not been good at all. We have encountered every typical attitude that teachers and administrators hold against gifted kids, as decribed in all the gifted education books that we have read. It's been our family that have done all the work to make sure my kids are learning what they need to learn, and to help them cope with an environment that demands them to fit in a box. And what's sad is that it's not just the public schools. My son is now in a private school and the difference is not much----they still want him to fit in a box, just a different box. My younger child has an easier time at school because we have no expectations for the school at all and we are more experienced in helping her cope. I feel that our schools are indeed failing the capable and motivated students.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
I know some private schools are poor as well, but I wonder how much has to do with size. When we moved to a different state my brother was entering 10th grade. My parents deliberately moved to one of the top districts in the area (a large district with a large high school). My mom took him to register at the high school and they could not offer him accelerated courses that he needed. My mother immediately drove us to a very small Christian high school (only 40-75 kids per grade) and they were able to tailor instruction to him. The teachers worked with him one-on-one. They sent him to the university for classes as needed. While there were very few in the "gifted" category, he did great, and went on and became a physicist. Seems like large schools/districts have so much red tape and bureaucracy and they try hard to fit everyone in a box because it's too complicated otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309 |
If the mentality is right, then a smaller school could offer more flexibility. But if the mentality is not right, then size doesn't matter. My son's private school is actually very small, but there is a very disappointing gap between what the school talks about and how they actually do things.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309 |
The next question: do schools really care about the students?
Our own experience, and my observation of friends' kids (not necessarily gifted kids, some struggle a lot in school), makes me think that the answer is no. My feeling is that students are data points that the bureaucracy needs to show that they are doing a good job and therefore should receive continued funding. I hope I'm too sarcastic and the reality is better than this.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 848
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 848 |
If the mentality is right, then a smaller school could offer more flexibility. But if the mentality is not right, then size doesn't matter. My son's private school is actually very small, but there is a very disappointing gap between what the school talks about and how they actually do things. Agreed. In my limited experience, the people aka mentality is what matters most.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 156
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 156 |
If the mentality is right, then a smaller school could offer more flexibility. But if the mentality is not right, then size doesn't matter. Very much agree with this. In our experience, the smaller public district (1 HS, about 2400 students in the district) was less flexible than the larger public district we're at now (3 HSs, about 16,000 students in the district). But the most flexible was the tiny private school of about 50 K-5 students (my daughter's class size ranged from 12 to 8). --S.F.
For gifted children, doing nothing is the wrong choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,453
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,453 |
Our public school district is tiny and while we have had our ups and downs I see that they have been astonishingly flexible with our DD.
I have been on this forum for less than a year and almost from the start I have recognized that for kids like ours almost any school is not going to be enough for them. It is up to us as parents to do what we can to enrich and accelerate outside of school. Not ideal at all but it is the truth.
I see parents with kids in private and public schools on this board and I think that they are equally satisfied/dissatisfied with the way that their children are being educated from reading their posts.
Become what you are
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309 |
I only occasionally go to online forums, but I'm so glad that I saw this thread. We have had a very tough time recently, ended up moving our middle schooler to a private school and the improvement is minimal. I see in this thread parents' frustrations that are so similiar to ours and teacher/administrator attitudes (even quotes) that are exactly what we got in our public and private schools. My family has lost confidence in our district completely. It's not that they don't want to accommodate the outliers. This is a district that has lots of gifted kids and a very strong focus on academics. I think the problem is that the schools have a very shallow understanding of the needs of these students and what these students are capable of. Therefore, on the surface, the school offers lots of options, but in essence, these options don't really work.
We have done lots of things on our own to make sure that kids get what they need. It's hard but who will do it if we don't? We are also working with friends to try and build community based programs for these kids. It's hard, too. But it is a small comfort to know that so many parents are going through the same process. The lack of meaningful gifted education (not just "a program" for show) has been for decades----based on the books that I read.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
The next question: do schools really care about the students?
Our own experience, and my observation of friends' kids (not necessarily gifted kids, some struggle a lot in school), makes me think that the answer is no. My feeling is that students are data points that the bureaucracy needs to show that they are doing a good job and therefore should receive continued funding. I hope I'm too sarcastic and the reality is better than this. IME, teachers (mostly) DO care-- often very deeply. Of course, they too become victims at the hands of the system. Why? Bureaucracy, by wry definition, cares about nothing but itself. It bludgeons those who don't 'fit' the "process" until they leave or conform. There are a lot of good teachers who are crushed under those millstones over time, in other words... becoming bitter, disillusioned, or deadened to the passion that led them into the profession to begin with. Most of the helping professions are susceptible to this kind of burnout when the individuals are stripped of autonomy in favor of bureaucratic, rigid procedural correctness, IME. The sum of the two factors is what we observe with schools. I really had tears well up in my eyes when I read the post a bit back which described this process from the perspective OF a teacher. It's very sad to see. There's something innately HUMAN about great teachers and teaching. Stripping the humanity via bureaucratic controls is part of what is deeply, deeply wrong with education now. Not all of it, of course-- the other problem is that the profession seems to encourage mediocre (or worse) subject mastery, which is a separate-- but no less vexing-- issue.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
THIS is the post that I'm talking about. This is so sad-- and so completely true. As the parent of a gifted 3rd grader, I'm disheartened. I'm tired of fighting the same battle every year, and losing.
As a high school teacher, I'm also disheartened. I'm actually a fan of the new Common Core. As they're written (at least ELA, which is what I teach), they're really focused, good standards that get to the heart of what kids should know. It's the scripted curricula and publishing packages, I think, that are giving it a bad name.
However, the focus in my state is more and more on rigid, data-driven processes that lead to standardized testing. I spend a lot of time crunching numbers and devising BS assessments, instead of going back to those Common Core standards and refining my curriculum and assessments in a meaningful way. I'm one of those teachers that tries very hard to relate to and address my students as individual human beings, so being forced to be so data-driven is difficult for me, especially when there are only so many hours in the day. Other than her critique of Common Core, which I don't agree with, I am really on board with what Diane Ravitch said in her interview on the Daily Show this past week.
I'm also disheartened as an educator and a former gifted student and the parent of a gifted kid because I know that when teachers are stretched too thin, it's the gifted kids who lose out. It takes time and effort (and, let's be honest here, intellect) to design good and meaningful extension work for gifted kids, but when I'm scrambling to meet the IEPs of my special ed kids (none of whom are 2E, by the way), and trying to crunch data, and working to refine my curriculum and lesson plans to meet both the Common Core and the initiative du jour as dictated by my state or my local administration, and grading all of those essays (I teach English), and oh yeah, taking care of my own small children, it seems that the gifted kids fall by the wayside. It's a constant source of guilt for me.
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
Bureaucracy, by wry definition, cares about nothing but itself. It bludgeons those who don't 'fit' the "process" until they leave or conform. There are a lot of good teachers who are crushed under those millstones over time, in other words... becoming bitter, disillusioned, or deadened to the passion that led them into the profession to begin with. Most of the helping professions are susceptible to this kind of burnout when the individuals are stripped of autonomy in favor of bureaucratic, rigid procedural correctness, IME. Yes, this. In The Trouble with Physics, Lee Smolin wrote about group sociology and how people can see problems as individuals and yet act in a way that contributes to the problems when they're in groups. I'm sure we've all experienced it: you're in a group, you know that x is wrong, but you feel powerless to stop it. If you speak up, you may not be able to change anything AND you get into trouble. This is especially the case when the leaders don't want to change and a lot of people support them. It's one reason why leadership can cause or fix so many problems.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309 |
Over the years we have met a few teachers who are very aware of the importance of challenging the advanced students, but I feel that either their hands are tied or they don't have the proper training to do so anyways. But we appreciate them nonetheless for thinking for these students.
However, I'd say the majority of the teachers that we've interacted with are quite content with what they do and feel that the parents are the unreasonable ones. I think they truly don't understand the needs of the advanced students. For example, our district uses Everyday Math as well, and parents have heard so many times that "but EDM has built-in enrichment for every chapter and we are doing those. Why are you still not satisfied?".
Things seem to be worse in middle school than in elementary school. I think it's partly because of the larger class size in middle school. But it's also partly because there is a bit of built-in acceleration in middle school (in math only). So the school feels that it has already done with accommodating advanced students.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,157 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 448
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 448 |
I have to say that at the moment we're actually pretty happy with our public school. We're in Canada so some stuff is the same but some is slightly different. Our teachers are well paid and all of the newer ones have at least 6 years of university. In my city it is extremely difficult to get a teaching job unless you speak French and there are thousands of unemployed new teachers looking for work. All of the teachers I have dealt with so far have really cared and tried their best. Not all of them completely understand gifted/2e kids needs or can manage to juggle them with a class full of a wide range of other issues but so far at least, it hasn't been for lack of effort. DS was identified 2e through private testing last year part way through grade 1. We chose to test privately to avoid waiting and I'm ok with that. There are far more people in the system who's kids need an eval for bigger issues and who can't afford it. Once we had the report we went in and talked with the VP who turns out had just worked for 5 years in the board's special ed department - she gets it which is nice. We then got an IEP in place for the rest of the year that mostly dealt with the LD side of things but I was ok with that (at least short term). I helped in the classroom weekly and last year the LD issues far surpassed the gifted ones and that teacher couldn't handle doing both. The VP hand picked his class and teacher for this year and it has been a million times better. We send in work for him to do during math and we informally after school to satisfy his insane drive for knowledge. School at this point is about socialization and working on the LD side of things. He's now to the point that he hardly ever needs any of the accommodations in his IEP so we can now focus more on the gifted side (and it has made his gifted side more obvious at school so they are much more willing to focus on that). This calm likely won't last forever but for this year at least we're enjoying it. The gifted programming starts in grade 4 so hopefully we can figure it out until then (and hopefully it will be enough). If not then we'll deal with whatever comes. DD is in SK and we'll likely test her once she is 6. We've had comments about her for years since she doesn't appear to have the same 2e issues. For now, she's happy, loves playing with her friends and then doing all of DS's grade 2 work when she gets home Next year might be fun since it will be less about play and more about academics that she has already mastered. My mom and MIL were both teachers for 30+ years each and I've worked a lot in the schools over the past couple years. They are juggling a lot and I empathize. The schools cater to the majority and for the most part that works (at least for the majority). When you have a 1/100 kid (or a 1/10000+ kid like some of you do) the system breaks down and you need caring, compassionate, educated people to patch together solutions. Unfortunately from the sounds of most of the stories here they are few and far between which is sad especially for the kids who's parents can't or won't advocate on their behalf.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309 |
I don't know where sub-forum is the right place to discuss books, so I will just mention it here. I've read a few books that I liked very much recently, not on gifted education but on education in general. One that gave me a pleasant surprise is The Smartest Kids in the World. I learned a lot about the system of teacher training in the US, Finland, Korea and Poland. It is disheartening that our system seems to have no rigor at all, but it also explained a lot. I was always amazed at the general attitudes that the teachers and the district have toward gifted students, but having some ideas of what these teachers may have or have not learned, such attitudes really make a lot of sense to me now.
The current emphasis of schools seems to be to send as many students as possible to colleges. It's somewhat counter-intuitive. It really shouldn't be about the college degree, but about what the students will have learned when they enter the workplace. Some surveys and research, and lots of anecdotes show that today's kids learn less in K-12 than older generations. So it seems that we are simply redistributing the learning task over a longer period of time so that kids enter college with a lower academic level than in the past (hence more students are "ready" for college). And of course they then spend a huge amount of money in college to learn things that they should have learned in high school for free (including all the remedial courses that students take in college). Meanwhile, K-12 schools have an even harder time to accommodate the students at the higher end of the spectrum. I, for one, am all for the recent trend toward competency-based education instead of doing-your-time-for-a-degree.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,261 Likes: 8 |
I think the problem is that the schools have a very shallow understanding of the needs of these students and what these students are capable of. Therefore, on the surface, the school offers lots of options, but in essence, these options don't really work. Agreed! There's differentiation, enrichment, pull-outs, etc... but in practice much of it is illusory.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 423
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 423 |
I think the problem is that the schools have a very shallow understanding of the needs of these students and what these students are capable of. Therefore, on the surface, the school offers lots of options, but in essence, these options don't really work. Agreed! There's differentiation, enrichment, pull-outs, etc... but in practice much of it is illusory. Oh absolutely, where I live, they talk a good game, they know all the buzz words in GT, all of the teachers have GT certifications, however, administration understands so little of the needs of GT students, they lock the program down on so many levels and limits the flexibility of the program so much that good people have their hands tied in what they can do and are forced to be much less effective than they could be if they just let good people do what they're good at.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 137
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 137 |
I really had tears well up in my eyes when I read the post a bit back which described this process from the perspective OF a teacher. It's very sad to see. There's something innately HUMAN about great teachers and teaching. Stripping the humanity via bureaucratic controls is part of what is deeply, deeply wrong with education now. Wow! I'm flattered and honored, HowlerKarma!
Stacey. Former high school teacher, back in the corporate world, mom to 2 bright girls: DD12 & DD7.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 53
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 53 |
I also loved your post Stacey. I really like the common core. The questions are much more thought provoking and it has actually been easier for is to differentiate because a lot of the homework has been "make up your own question using this concept" type of things. I do feel so bad for all of the teachers who want to make a difference for each kid because it is just soooo much work with implementing the new standards and worrying about testing and just having so much going on all at once. Hopefully in the next few years it will get easier.
I have been very very lucky. We have been to 3 different private schools between 2 of my kids, and the public school my son is now in has been amazing for us. It took a bit of work in the beginning, but he is now grade skipped and accelerated an extra year in math with the support of the principal and all the teachers he has had so far. His current teacher just rearranged her class schedule for him without us even asking because she didn't think it was fair for him to miss social studies and have to do the work on his own later. After reading all the struggles others have had and having been there myself when my son was in preK, I just feel so proud of our school for stepping up and doing so much on their own to help my son. I love them. My daughter will start there next year hopefully with a grade skip.
There are some good school out there and there are great teachers and great principals. It's just too bad that it's the exception and not the norm. If I could hug our school I would.
|
|
|
|
|