Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 133 guests, and 252 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ihatedarkroast, blockbreaker2, nebula, new88betus, geometrydashes
    11,916 Registered Users
    April
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,453
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,453
    This looks really, really good.

    It really beats the NYT dumb Bible Belt cracker stereotype!

    Apparently, there are 3 things from Texas now...

    Last edited by madeinuk; 10/14/13 05:08 PM.

    Become what you are
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 1,478
    Z
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Z
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 1,478
    Maybe if a few kids make it through the program they can help the district fix their web links.

    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,293
    Likes: 14
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,293
    Likes: 14
    The online brochure containing their appeals process is a good read. It largely summarizes, formalizes, and streamlines the fact-gathering steps which many advocacy articles recommend and which parents often share snippets of as tips on gifted forums.

    Some may find the appeals brochure worth printing and saving.

    From reading of advocacy difficulties on other recent threads, some may wonder whether more gifted children, families, and school districts might benefit by establishing similar uniform appeals processes?

    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    I'm a bit confused they seem to be using the log from the old style tests - hg >145 but the tests they mention as qualifiers are newer one which would make their minimum criteria the same as Davidson or top 0.01 %. I didn't read more than the first few pages though because I find bullet points hard tto read for more than that.

    Or maybe they are just applying extended norms for the very top. I think it is just that I am confused about this in general. Everybody says "it is not like his IQ is 200 is it?" he'll be fine and unless they understand stats it is a bit hard to explain.

    Last edited by puffin; 10/14/13 09:34 PM.
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Posts: 848
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Posts: 848
    Is it usual to have to retest (outside assessments) every two years? Just wondering in case we relocate in the future... our last round of testing was pretty expensive.

    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 669
    S
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 669
    I special education (ESE) they retest every three years but not full batteries of testing that is done at the beginning of placement. It is retesting only in the areas where people need updated data so if writing is the biggest concern then the focus of retesting would be writing (and anything associated with writing that might help with future planning, OT eval, VMI testing, etc.)and not, say math. You might look at scores from testing that is done on every kid (like the yearly NCBL testing) in all areas but not individual testing in all areas. And for repeat IQ testing there needs to be a reason for it.

    In gifted education, I suppose you could apply the same rules to re-evaluation but I don't know if they do or not. Gather what data already exists from group testing, talent search testing, etc. and then determine what areas you need more information and only test in those areas. You don't need a repeated IQ every two years. Some organizations might want a repeated IQ for children who were tested as young preschoolers not using the WISC or SB.


    ...reading is pleasure, not just something teachers make you do in school.~B. Cleary
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Posts: 848
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Posts: 848
    Thank you, Sweetie!



    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    "Gifted" or just "Talented"?
    by FrameistElite - 04/14/26 08:48 AM
    Grade Acceleration K-1-2
    by FrameistElite - 04/14/26 08:45 AM
    Issues with capitalization
    by aeh - 04/09/26 05:16 PM
    Dyspraxia/DCD and giftedness
    by aeh - 04/09/26 04:57 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5