0 members (),
188
guests, and
15
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10 |
Thing about talented musicians is that they are allowed to excell. If they learn how to play advanced peices, they are not going to have to spend 7+ hrs a day at school working on scales and Twinkle Twinkle Little Star. SO, if you leave your child in the class your child is in, then do not throw extra work at your child. If your child is gifted at math, and he gets all the concepts quickly, and you do not intend to accelerate him from the class he is in, then do not do extra work on the side. It will not benefit him at all. If fact, it will hurt him. He will not benefit from tedious repetition and next week, and next month, and next year, will be all the worse for him because he will know the subject all the better.
Have you read the book "Genius Denied?" It is a very good book. I highly recommend it. But the main point I am trying to make is, if your child excells in violin, your child is allowed to go on to the next level and do more and learn more and go further. The only true options here would be to either leave things alone as they are or change the situation. But leaving things how they are and adding more to it will not help your child one bit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,207
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,207 |
Hi Summer70,
You give the advice not to "throw extra work at your child." What is this opinion based on?
I've seen Afterschooling work very well for many families. In my son's own class there is a boy who my son reports is very gifted, and "could have a grade skip if he wanted one," but is very satisfied to stay where he is and do each assignment above and beyond what the teachers assign, to the degree that his parents assign. There are ways in which I feel sad that I didn't think to do this early enough to make this routine for my son. Not that my DH would have gone along with that plan! But I have done some periods of Afterschooling with my son, - UnAfterschooling? - where I follow his lead and provide just a bit of incentive, as a way of getting to know him as a learner. I can't imagine how I could have advocated for him without this experience.
I think that each family and each child is different, and while I like the idea getting each child into the classroom that will meet their needs, I can see that it just doesn't always work out for every situation,
Love and More Love, Trinity
Coaching available, at SchoolSuccessSolutions.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 778
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 778 |
This original topic posted by Ania is timely for our family.
I have begun to move into the �developing talent� phase in my considerations as to what is best for our kids. I would like to express thanks to the experts at the Davidson Institute and you all for guiding me toward this necessity. Thanks especially to you Ania for posting about specific programs and opportunities that you have pursued for your son and the accolades and recognition he has earned as a result of his aptitude, effort and achievement. We have received our son�s EXPLORE results which validate that he is extremely talented in math and science when compared to 8th grade norms and also in relation to other highly talented 5th graders (whose mean generally exceeded the older students). He scored very well even though he has had minimal formal enrichment or acceleration. I find that periodic validation helps to renew my energy for advocacy. I am also inspired by the direction you all share.
My husband and I have come to the conclusion that no school in our area will provide the level of instruction that our son could handle during the next 31/2 years before high school. Our school is academically strong and offers some flexibility with subject acceleration, but I would not characterize it as a level 4 school. We do not have unlimited financial resources so we have decided to prioritize our kids intellectual pursuits above other desires. This means we are giving up a trip to Europe over the summer to pay for, drive to and spend time in far less glamorous locations around the U.S. so they can attend academic camps and we can improve our advocacy knowledge and skills.
Maybe we will see Europe with the kids next year. Thanks everyone � I think.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 865
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 865 |
I think there are some great resources on this board for math talented kids...I'm jotting them down for my son. I saw an article on posted on one of the other boards I thought would be interesting, especially for Ania, since I remember your son scored very high on the SATs (I'm referencing the article and excerpting the section I found important):
Author(s): VanTassel-Baska, J. Source: National Association for Gifted Children Gifted Child Quarterly Volume 28
It identifies students of junior-high age who have already scored at the 95th percentile (the Johns Hopkins and Duke talent search use 97th percentile) or higher on an ingrade standardized achievement test in their homeschool setting to determine eligibility. It uses the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) as a second-level test to determine level of mathematical and verbal ability.
Specific Recommendations for Students Scoring 400-520 on SAT-V and/or SAT-M Students scoring at these levels on the SAT can profit from special accelerated coursework at the seventh- and/or eighth-grade level in each respective area of aptitude. For example, a seventh grader scoring SAT-M ? 400 can handle Algebra I. In the verbal area, an SAT-V ? 400 for a seventh grader would indicate ability to handle an intensive writing skills program, a special critical reading program, or a high school foreign language offering (e.g., Latin I) in less time than even other able students of their age. Thus, the following recommendations are made:
Offer fast-paced, advanced coursework during the academic year in a student's tested area of strength. Provide follow-up academic counseling to encourage student involvement in advanced coursework and to help students set educational goals. Encourage these students to attend a summer program on a university campus in an academic area of strength and interest.
Specific Recommendations for Students Scoring 530-650 on SAT-V and/or SAT-M Students scoring at these very high levels on the test should be encouraged to participate in as many academically appropriate educational alternatives as possible. These include but are not limited to the following:
Develop an individualized program of study in the home-school setting that will allow these students to "test out" of content already mastered in mathematics and/or verbal areas and to continue to progress in the content area at a rate commensurate with their proficiency. A diagnostic-prescriptive (D - P) teaching approach is a necessary component of such a program. Encourage student participation in one of the university programs that employ a fast-paced model. Opportunities for interaction with other highly gifted students, intensive study with high-quality faculty in a compressed time frame, and opportunities for higher-level proficiency are important benefits. Provide academic counseling, especially on early access to Advanced Placement (AP) and the possibility for grade acceleration in the span of years from grades 7-12.
Specific Recommendations for Students Scoring 650-800 on SAT-V and/or SAT-M Students scoring at the highest range on the test are operating at levels better than 80% of college-bound seniors on the same test and, therefore, need to have additional opportunities and a more intensive program. Recommendations for this group would include all of those listed for the preceding range (530-650 SAT-M or V) and the following additional ones:
Investigate early admission opportunities and/or advanced standing at high quality institutions for these students now. Early planning for the appropriate college that may offer scholarships to outstanding students needs to occur early. Establish a mentorship or tutorial for such students pairing them with outstanding adults in the community who share the ability and interest of such students. Provide students with easy access to career information that provides data on high-level professional careers focusing on original research.
Ania, I found the entire article very interesting, but didn't want to reprint it here (too long and there's probably a copyright problem).
Cym
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802 |
Thank you guys for all the info. I have been extremely busy with Math Kangaroo 2007. The competition is tonight, so come tomorrow I will finally clean my house and have more time to write :-) Ania
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802 |
<<I would not characterize it as a level 4 school.>>
What are we talking about here, I am lost. Would appreciate if someone could explain. Thanx.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802 |
Summer70 writes <<Thing about talented musicians is that they are allowed to excell. If they learn how to play advanced peices, they are not going to have to spend 7+ hrs a day at school working on scales and Twinkle Twinkle Little Star >>
I disagree with passion. When it comes to music, repetition of previously mastered material is one of the key factors in a measured progress. In fact, when it comes to practicing, teachers say that only 10% of practice time should be spend on a new piece, the rest of the time is to be spend on scales, technique practice (those boring etudes) and a constant repetition of a previously mastered material. Having said that, I do not think that math should be practiced the same way. But kids will never be good in math problem solving unless they practice those skills. I have a very interesting story to share about this, but I am going to post it under a Math Kangaroo thread. Ania
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 778
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 778 |
My reference to school TYPE (sorry) is from Deborah Ruf�s book, �Losing our Minds; Gifted Children Left Behind�.
She describes type I schools as public schools were there is much poverty, a highly mobile population and many children who are just learning English.
Type II are small public, private, or parochial schools that accept children on criteria other than just ability and achievement scores.
Type III schools have a reputation for high standardized test scores. Most parents have a higher than average education and socioeconomic background.
Type IV are public or private schools for highly gifted students were admissions are allowed based on achievement and intelligence scores.
Type V are the most accommodating for individual learning and employs ability grouping.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802 |
Thanx Delbows, I never read the book (is on this summer reading list:-) Looks like my kids are in type V. Lucky us. We moved from type III. Have a great weekend guys, I am still up to my elbows in house chores. Ania
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Post deleted by Mark Dlugosz
|
|
|
|
|