Originally Posted by Catalana
Originally Posted by CFK
Whole grade acceleration should be a last resort, after all the other options have been tried.


CFK, I am curious why you think this. While I certainly agree it isn't the best option for all kids - it really depends on what other options are available, as well as the child's subject mastery, LOG, maturity, etc. I definitely wouldn't view it as a last resort - in fact, for some kids it is probably the best and should be the first resort.
I generally agree with CFK�s statement, but stop short of accepting whole grade acceleration as a universal last option. I will also point out that the assertion that LOG differentiates between students who are or who are not whole grade advanced is an irritant among a more silent population of DYS families. I personally think the choice usually has more to do with options, goals and strategies (such as decelerating a student while switching up to a more rigorous middle school or high school).

My ideal scenario for education would be to allow gifted students to remain identified as an age appropriate Xgrader, while take some or all classes two or three levels up. In this scenario, typical gifted students might get through elementary school two years early, but then spend two extra years at the high school level. Of course, I am assuming that the high school is one that has numerous true college level courses taught by highly qualified teachers. If that were the case, it would allow hs graduates to enter regular colleges as at least sophomore status. If a student�s goal is to attend a very selective, high-level university this set-up would simply allow them to develop into a more viable candidate than if they had graduated at 15 with an average course progression.

Last edited by delbows; 03/13/10 12:55 PM. Reason: Clarification