If that's what Cobb says, he is using words he doesn't understand, I'm afraid: it's nonsense. [ETA I mean, e.g., because Goedel's incompleteness thm doesn't apply in any non-trivial way to propositional calculus, because the latter is not powerful enough.] For some reason, many people like to use logical terms they don't understand (such as "propositional calculus" and "Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem") to make their arguments sound better. After one too many examples, I now use the presence of that technique as a sign that I can save the effort I'd otherwise have spent on reading the rest of what the author writes!
Last edited by ColinsMum; 11/04/09 01:08 PM.
