The school is right. Something definitely looks off. You would need scores of 19's and 18's to get a VCI of 155. The PRI looks off, too. Did the report include the WMI and PSI composites? I'm not sure the FSIQ is right, either. In any case, it doesn't jibe with the VCI and PRI listed here.
I'm wondering if when the test was scored, maybe the Other Subtests were accidently included in the sum of scaled scores...
I can't tell you what the VCI and PRI should be since I don't have the tables, but Dottie could. She is on vacation (I think) but you could send her a private message so this post doesn't get buried.
