Bummer
Did they say how they intend to meet her need for more advanced curriculum?
Remember, she's not gifted according to her FSIQ. So they don't feel she has any need for more advanced curriculum.
When it became clear to me that they weren't budged by the NAGC statement, I asked for some very basic accommodation (like making sure she was paired with at least one other bright kid next year in her regular classroom). I was told that they couldn't do this.
So you see why it's so important to me that her WISC-IV score is interpreted properly. I'm confused about why they don't respond to the fact that there is a huge discrepancy in her composite scores. I thought it was pretty well established that this would render the test invalid, forcing the examiner to use the GAI for this reason alone. Frankly, I'm not fighting to get her in the GT program. I just want it acknowledged that SOME differentiation needs to occur.
