Neuroplasticity is what would allow the problems in the brain to get fixed. If the brain already had developed a work-around to the problem, there wouldn't be much of a problem left, or would there?
I guess this where a lot research becomes difficult. This is where I guess a lot of misdiagnosis in gifted children and adults can come from.
But if one has found a work-around, is the problem corrected, or has there just been an alternative method for problem solving? Its like insulin shots for diabetics; although there is no cure, there is a work-around. The problem still exists, it's just a way of managing. I hope that somewhat clarifies the point I was trying to make earlier.
Was that a bad analogy?
