Originally Posted by ConnectingDots
Originally Posted by alcyone
It continues to trouble me when gifted education is equated to a good education--the kind many private schools offer. That good education ought to be a priority everywhere. And as good as it can be, it's not the same thing as gifted education.

Agree 100%. If the norm in public education was to challenge each child according to her or his needs, with the right tools and resources, we might not see this mania.

We are not in a lottery system (there are no gifted schools, although there are programs, required by law). Whenever I hear about them, I think, doesn't the very need for a lottery say that the system needs to rebalance things in order to have the right number of slots?
Agree 100%. The so-called shortage of gifted seats is a falsely created shortage of opportunity. Rather than the current "divide and conquer" strategy of having families with gifted pupils compete for seats, public schools could repurpose a number of existing general education seats as gifted seats, providing the appropriate number of gifted seats to match the number of pupils needing an advanced, gifted education.

Matching the program to the child, rather than matching the child to the program.