Yes, more subtests could have been given. A LOT more subtests. But the main ones that would have been nice to have would have been the remaining VS (Visual Puzzles), WM (Picture Span), and PS subtests (Symbol Search). For GT qualification purposes, though, the seven she was given are usually all that are recommended, as FSIQ, GAI, VCI, and FRI can be derived from them.

Her profile is strongest in abstract thinking, nearly as strong in visual spatial (though it's hard to tell if this may have been affected by her slightly slower processing speed, since the one subtest given has bonus points for speed), also decent in auditory working memory, and average in verbal and processing speed. The VCI relative weakness is pretty consistent across all of the VC subtests, and distinct from the stronger performance in almost all of the other areas, which suggests that it is a real difference.

Good to hear she does well in writing. I expect she is using her high abstract thinking and reasoning skills to drive her reading and writing achievement, because her actual verbal comprehension ability is distinctly lower than the other areas. The best composite indicator of her overall ability would probably be the Nonverbal Index, which would require administration of a few more subtests (Visual Puzzles, Picture Span). Given the BD and Cd scores, though, she would really have to hit it out of the park on these two subtests to make it above 130 on her NVI.

More importantly, her profile suggests that you may wish to keep an eye on the possibility of subtle language-based learning disabilities (twice exceptional GT/LD, in this case) revealing themselves in the future. At the moment, she appears to be functioning rather well, but the curve does spread more as you move up through the grades.

I do believe that the FRI conceptualizes her ability the best, but in terms of GT program eligibility, there probably is not a high likelihood of benefit from re-testing. Unless they accept the Ravens or NNAT-2 as qualifying cognitive measures. (Two tests that play to her strengths.)


...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...