I mentioned cueing on re-administration because the examiner appears to have re-administered only those items that were originally answered incorrectly, which may have tipped him off that his initial responses were wrong, thereby increasing the likelihood of changing to a correct response. This is factored into the BVAT norms, but not into the French WPPSI-IV norms (to my knowledge). I wonder why the examiner didn't just administer the whole thing in French to begin with, knowing that he was stronger in French than in English, and use those norms.
With the clinical information included in the report, it might very well be worthwhile applying. Actually, now that I think about this, this might not be that difficult of an application. He just needs to have two 145+ scores, which can be Visual Spatial and Fluid Reasoning. And it sounds like those are in that range?
