DD's was 7E (V+Q-). Her verbal score was about 30 points higher than quantitative (because she actually finished the verbal section and left half of the quantitative section blank). I wonder if your report is a typo--it doesn't make a lot of sense. I would not make too much of the profile. In my DD's case it shows weak math and strong verbal, but that is the opposite of what achievement and IQ testing shows. For achievement testing she at 98th percentile for math but barely average on the CogAT. For IQ, her general ability index (composite of verbal/non-verbal) is 150. On the CogAt it was 118. The CogAT is a ridiculous test, esp. if there is a circumstance like it was a timed version and the child did not finish. You should try to get a more detailed score report. The one I have shows the percentiles for each section and the number of questions attempted. That's how I figured out that DD left half of the test blank for non-verbal and quantitative and why her scores were horrid. Your DD made it onto the next round of testing which is all she needed to accomplish--so don't worry too much about what the scores or ability profiles mean. Really--they mean very little.
