Originally Posted by intparent
Has anyone here had a kid rebel against experiential learning?

If learning through direct experience were always best, we would not need schools and books. Children would learn just by experiencing the world. In reality, the existence of books and (ideally) teachers who know their subjects permits students to learn much more than they otherwise could.

The ability to learn from books depends on intelligence, and experiential learning has the "advantage" of ensuring that no one learns too much.


"To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle." - George Orwell