Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 423 guests, and 22 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
    crisc #33877 01/01/09 05:56 PM
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 40
    L
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    L
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 40
    Quote
    Our test is not designed to differentiate at the higher end. If someone is scoring at the higher end they don�t have a cognitive skill problem. Since we cover several different areas beyond what a typical IQ test covers, each subtest would have had to be too long to have fidelity at the higher end. To keep the test length reasonable, our focus is to identify whether a student has any specific weak cognitive skills. Although the test will identify weak skills for any age person 7 and up, the focus is on younger children. Our test used to be 50-100% longer, depending upon the test, and children found it too long to stay engaged.



    The purpose of our test is to identify if any key cognitive skills may be weak and holding back a student from achieving their best. I have known several students that had high average IQs yet struggled with learning. It took very expensive cognitive skill testing to find out which specific skills were weak. Our test is designed to make that process easy and affordable.

    Ah well. It was an interesting test anyway.

    Mia #33880 01/01/09 08:16 PM
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 435
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 435
    It was a little wonky - my DS5 (almost 6) also had like an age equiv of 14 on several sections.

    gratified3 #33883 01/01/09 09:50 PM
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 199
    J
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    J
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 199
    Yeah, interesting test. And great just as a fun thing to do with Miss 7. But no, I really don't believe she has an auditory memory age equivalent of 13 or a long term memory of a 17 year old !!! But it was quite cool, and I ended up shoving some maths on the end of it and we 'worked' for about 75 minutes - the longest Miss 7 has sat - engaged - for months!!!

    jojo

    Dottie #33905 01/02/09 09:48 AM
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 71
    A
    az1 Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 71
    Now it's starting to make sense. No wonder those of us whose kids took it and were in the "higher end" were confused by the results.

    Thanks Lina for getting the scoop on the test.

    I wonder what additional info will be available later this year for this test?

    az1 #33910 01/02/09 11:24 AM
    Joined: Dec 2007
    Posts: 485
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Dec 2007
    Posts: 485
    Hopefully our kids didn't intefere with the norming too much. smile


    Crisc
    crisc #33922 01/02/09 01:00 PM
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 71
    A
    az1 Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 71
    Oops! I bet our tests will impact the results somehow blush

    Oh well.

    az1 #33941 01/02/09 05:02 PM
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 302
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 302
    I'd be kind of surprised if they could really norm a test based on internet responses... I mean it only takes a couple of bored insomniacs to seriously mess with the numbers in any variety of ways... LOL Generally I think test norming is meant to be a fairly controlled process...

    But then I'm generally a cynic about stuff like this too wink


    Erica
    KAR120C #33951 01/02/09 09:43 PM
    Joined: Oct 2007
    Posts: 2,231
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2007
    Posts: 2,231
    Not for nothing, but, the percentile results people have been reporting have been getting get me to thinking about how they normed the test in the first place..............

    OHGrandma #33962 01/03/09 11:04 AM
    Joined: Apr 2008
    Posts: 30
    J
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    J
    Joined: Apr 2008
    Posts: 30
    Off the subject but if anyone lives in the Chicago area our school is having Linda Silverman, Ph.D come to speak on Giftedness in general and the 2E challenges specifically.
    Lake Forest district 67.

    I was asked to help get the word out and have interested people come.

    She tested our 2E daughter and has been a real resource for all of us.
    date- january 21st and 6:30 pm.

    I can give details if anyone wants to PM me or find more information on the school web site www.lfelem.lfc.edu/district/programs/gifted_services.html

    JoAnn #33974 01/03/09 01:19 PM
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,299
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,299
    JoAnn,
    That looks really great and I wish I lived closer to Chicago. Hmmm...road trip??
    I hope you don't mind me copying it to it's own new thread so it doesn't get missed.

    Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by spaghetti - 05/14/24 08:14 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5