Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 308 guests, and 40 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 46
    J
    JBD Offline OP
    Junior Member
    OP Offline
    Junior Member
    J
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 46
    Okay, I know this is a loaded question. First, you can't compare the screening tests to actual IQ tests- I know that. Second, level of giftedness is not necessarily determinative of the path of a child's education.

    That being said! I've always guessed my dd7 to be MG and my DS5 to likely not be gifted at all because although they are about two to three grade levels ahead on some stuff, they in general do just fine in their regular classrooms (1st grade and k). I advocate when necessary but in general leave well enough alone. But dd took the OLSAT last year and was in the 99th percentile and DS took the NNAT2 (good choice on the part of the gifted coordinator..I had told her he's easily distracted and might not do well on a group test) and also was in the 99th percentile.

    I'm wondering, *anecdotally*, if that means it's likely they are at least HG. The only reason I care is that their rate of growth keeps increasing, so although currently they are great in their regular classrooms I might have to move for more acceleration in the future. Knowing if I should think of them as HG+ just gives me a mental framework to work with. Does that make sense?

    Edited to add: even though the planner in me would love to have them take an IQ test, I don't think it's necessary and I don't think I should put them through that testing unless there's a reason. I wish their school tested using wppsi or wisc but oh well.

    Last edited by JBD; 05/16/18 06:54 AM.
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,051
    Likes: 1
    A
    aeh Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,051
    Likes: 1
    I think one can reasonably consider both your children some brand of GT, based on the instruments they were given, but it's probably not warranted to make judgments on LOG beyond that. From a planning standpoint, I would guess you've been on this forum long enough to know that planning is very much a year-to-year process for GT learners. Sometimes it's month-to-month. If their needs are met for the moment (happy, engaged, growing/learning as whole people), then great! Time enough to change up the program when one or more of those changes.


    ...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5