Despite being fascinated by IQ tests and the topic of intelligence in general, I find I like less and less IQ scores because they are based on normal scores. With pretty much only tells you relative other kids who took a test at a certain time. It doesn't tell you if your 8 year old could build their own rocket in your garage, or learn a language fluently in a year, etc. An IQ on this test doesn't equate to an IQ on that test. A culturally fair non-verbal test of IQ shows a lower IQ for a verbally gifted kid. A screening tool that is really only sensitive out to a certain point is used to give scores that it isn't designed to give, etc.
What are your observations? Is she reading many levels above her age? Are people amazed at how quick she understands things? Is she very curious, asks deep questions, dives deep into topics? Frustrated at school? etc. That's the real stuff, the scores are labels to try to communicate the real stuff to other people.
Achievement tests are probably more interesting in terms of actions to take, because they tend to guage a level of material that fits rather the comparative scoring itself.
