In relation to the non-reporting of the FSIQ - the psychologist told me verbally that it averaged out to 128. HOwever, she felt that this did not give a true representation of his high cognitive ability (verbal and non-verbal) as opposed to a comparative weakness in working memory and processing speed. She felt the spread was significant and reporting the FSIQ was perhaps misleading as to both the stronger and the weaker areas. She said that she would provide it if absolutely necessary. Thanks for all your great advice/input. I must admit he is a lot more interested in reading now than he has been in the past, so I will continue to encourage that and see what happens...
