Originally Posted by Tigerle
Its all in the definition of "succeed , isn't it? If you measure against a arbitrary Definition of grade level proficiency, oh well, they all succeed, gt program or not.
Which is where we come back to the need fir actually teaching higher lwvel content.

Yep, they are already "successful" so no need to spend any money on them. I guess our kids are warm bodies in the classroom collecting tax revenue. We define success as learning and working to one's potential, they define it as passing the test. Our district admin actually referred to the students as "products".