So if I am summarizing correctly, his VSI was in the 130s, FRI and VCI in the 120s, PSI in the 110s, and WMI in the 100s. That is likely to generate, not only an FSIQ in the 120s (as you reported), but a GAI in the 120s as well (possibly unless the 120s index scores are high 120s). Unless VSI is well above 130 (approaching or exceeding 140), this most likely does not constitute a significant split among the GAI index scores (VCI, VSI, FRI). A PSI in the 110s is not all that unusual among the GT population, with or without a second exceptionality. A WMI in the 100s may or may not be functionally significant.
I mentioned upthread the question of actual functional concerns. Do you have any, other than not being a reader at the moment? (Which others have addressed.)
