In terms of GAI and FSIQ, FWIW, when DS took the WISC and WIAT, the discrepancy analysis showed that he was performing MUCH closer to his GAI than what would be his FSIQ (the tester actually opined that the DYS-qualifying WISC was probably a low estimate, which frightened me a bit). I still think that both numbers are relevant, but they give slightly different pictures of his abilities.
While DD never had a discrepancy analysis, I would guess from her achievement scores, her results would be similar, where she performs closer to her GAI. Both DC have DYS-qualifying FSIQs (but for both we were told the GAI was a better measure), but GAIs approximately a standard deviation higher. Neither DC has been diagnosed as 2e. From reading these boards and from my own experience with my DC, I tend to think that this might not be an unusual pattern for a child with a high LOG.
