Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    1 members (aeh), 390 guests, and 13 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 1 of 2 1 2
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 73
    S
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 73
    Hi, I'm new to this forum and have a (hopefully) quick question. I am doing some reading on parenting gifted children, and I notice that every time an IQ score is mentioned in books (and usually online as well), the author doesn't say for which test the score applies. But when I look at this page on hoagies, I notice that the scores vary widely between tests for similar percentiles or 'levels of giftedness'.

    So when an IQ score is given without mentioning a test, to which test could I assume it is referring?

    Would it be reasonable to look at the hoagies chart as a rough conversion chart between tests?

    Thanks!
    Dawn

    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    I think you have to consider when the book or article was published. Scores in older books are usually SB L-M scores.

    The most commonly used IQ test now is the WISC-IV, I think.

    Last edited by Cathy A; 06/20/09 01:49 PM.
    Joined: Jul 2007
    Posts: 198
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jul 2007
    Posts: 198
    I'm not an expert by any means, but what I do is see how high the score is and how they're treating it as far as level of giftedness. Anything over 155ish is probably SB L-M. Even though the WISC-IV has extended scoring, it is not widely used yet for score reporting (I don't think).

    If it's a score that's harder to gauge like between 140-155ish, then see how impressed the author seems by it. If they're talking about it being a more moderate level of giftedness, then it's probably SB L-M. If they treat it like an extremely high score, then it's probably one of the modern tests.


    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 73
    S
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 73
    Thanks for the quick replies! Between these suggestions, I think I can figure it out. Wouldn't it be simpler if everyone referred to the percentiles instead? Would that even make sense? I noticed that the Mensa organization required their members to be above the 98th percentile on any of the standard usual tests in order to eliminate confusion about the actual scores.

    Do some authors refer to "highly" gifted when they really mean EG or PG? These terms all seem to be thrown about much to casually. smile

    Thanks!!
    Dawn

    Joined: Jul 2008
    Posts: 137
    B
    BKD Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Jul 2008
    Posts: 137
    Quote
    Wouldn't it be simpler if everyone referred to the percentiles instead?

    Oh yes yes yes!

    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    The problem with percentiles is that unless you go out to several digits, they sort of lump HG, EG, PG all together.

    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    I think I'd actually be very cautious about books that talk in terms of high IQ numbers without specifying what test they're talking about - it's a red flag if the author doesn't realise it's important! Which book(s) did you have in mind?


    Email: my username, followed by 2, at google's mail
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 73
    S
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 73
    Cathy, I understand that they would have to add in the decimal digits since HG seems to start at 99, and PG seems to start around 99.9? Such a difference within that one percentile point. smile

    ColinsMum, It may be that in my sleep deprived state I just couldn't find where the author indicated the test used. (In addition to my DD5, I have baby twins that seem to think that sleep is for wimps.) I am reading A Parent's Guide to Gifted Children and many, many websites. The book was recommended to me by the psychologist that administered my DD's test. He also recommended Hoagie's Gifted website to me, so I'm hoping I can assume it is well regarded to be accurate.

    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    Originally Posted by sdrothco
    Cathy, I understand that they would have to add in the decimal digits since HG seems to start at 99, and PG seems to start around 99.9? Such a difference within that one percentile point. smile

    As mentioned above, MG, HG, EG, and PG have no standard definition. The big problem is that score reports often list the percentile as ">99th percentile" or ">99.6th percentile" etc. So people don't really know the precise percentile anyway (assuming that kind of precision would be meaningful when you take the test ceiling into account.) Current tests are simply not designed to differentiate between these groups (however they are defined) whether the scores are reported as standard scores or percentiles.

    If you want to figure out the percentiles from the standard scores you can use this

    Score Conversion Table and this Normal Curve Calculator

    For example, if I have a standard score of 149 for a test with a standard deviation of 15, I can look in the table to find the corresponding Z-score (3.27) Then I can put that into the normal curve calculator to get a cumulative area of 0.9994622 which corresponds to a percentile rank of 99.94622

    Have fun with numbers smile

    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    If your test has a different standard deviation or mean, the formula for the Z-score is:

    Z = (SS - mean)/sd

    where SS is your standard score, and sd is the standard deviation. Z is the number of standard deviations by which your score differs from the mean (usually 100).

    Page 1 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:30 PM
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:21 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5