Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 117 guests, and 18 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    A
    aquinas Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    For a surreal experience, follow the mental gymnastics of the Vancouver School Board (BC, Canada) in its decision to discontinue streamed STEM high school classes:

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/can...es-out-honours-programs-in-high-schools/

    Particularly absurd quotes:
    Quote
    The Vancouver board and others in the province have changed the curriculum significantly since it was introduced in 2015, including getting rid of letter grades. Pedagogical experts maintain the new curriculum is aimed at better ensuring students understand their subject material rather than achieving a certain grade.

    Requires a 270-degree range of mobility for spinal extension to reconcile:
    Quote
    The district said these schools will not be cut because they do not violate equity principles. “The entire population of a mini school attends because they feel it is better suited to their learning. This is different from streaming students of varying abilities who are all part of the same student population at main schools,” it said in its statement.

    And the outright militant and baseless judgmentalism of a quoted professor specializing in spec ed, Jennifer Katz at UBC:

    Quote
    Jennifer Katz, an expert in special education at the University of British Columbia, supports the curriculum changes and has worked as a consultant for the Vancouver School Board. She said students who are strong in some subjects should be challenged. But she dismissed the concerns of parents who say their gifted children struggle to fit in.

    “That’s a stereotype,” she said. “I don’t buy that. That is a part of racism and systemic racism. It’s a part of ‘I don’t want my kids in class with those kids.’ And that’s nonsense.”

    Quote
    She said some specialized programs such as advanced placement are “almost always” made up of “middle- and upper-class kids whose parents have had them tutored for who knows how many years. And so you’re really streaming kids by socio-economic status.”

    She *does* realize that school catchment zones are already mapped to address, which is highly correlated with socio-economic status and race, no?

    This is the link to Dr. Katz' UBC profile:
    https://ecps.educ.ubc.ca/person/jennifer-katz/

    And her corporate (read: sales) page:
    http://www.threeblockmodel.com/

    **I need a mental shower now.**


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,053
    Likes: 1
    A
    aeh Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,053
    Likes: 1
    Interestingly, there appear to be some opposing viewpoints in UBC's special education faculty:

    Quote
    "...you’re also adding students with advanced learning needs in the classroom. It’s a very reasonable thing that a teacher will actually sacrifice first the student with advanced learning needs. … When you don’t give them enough challenged curriculum, how do they have a growth mindset? They don’t grow.”
    --Dr. Owen Lo (PhD in high ability studies, MA in gifted education)

    And this, from the parent of what appears to be a twice exceptional student, who, presumably, is concerned that her child will be twice excluded:

    Quote
    “I think you’re going to exclude the kids on each end of the learning profile more. It’s not becoming more inclusive. It is going to be more exclusive because those parents who can afford to seek out different resources will take their kids out of the public system to find a private school.”

    Last edited by aeh; 06/16/21 07:17 PM.

    ...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    A
    aquinas Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Yes, interesting there is such a contrast from within one department. It seems like quite a communications blunder, at best.


    What is to give light must endure burning.

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:30 PM
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:21 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5