Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 342 guests, and 29 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
    Joined: May 2012
    Posts: 235
    N
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    N
    Joined: May 2012
    Posts: 235
    It seems to me the older the child gets the less useful MAP is. I couldn't agree with you more that standardized test certainly doesn't equate to success in a class. An example my daughter was in a Algebra 2 class in eighth grade with kids that were 99% MAP scores. She's going into tenth grade now an now some are taking Calc BC, Calc AB and Trig/Calc A this upcoming year. My point is a MAP at this point is meaningless.

    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 8
    C
    Junior Member
    OP Offline
    Junior Member
    C
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 8
    OP here. We just received DS8's most recent MAP score. He scored 240 in math and 225 in reading. The points made by other posters last year were valid. It is probably a better practice to compare MAP progress year by year, instead of test by test.

    Again, thank you for all your input.

    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 647
    K
    Kai Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    K
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 647
    Originally Posted by nicoledad
    It seems to me the older the child gets the less useful MAP is. I couldn't agree with you more that standardized test certainly doesn't equate to success in a class. An example my daughter was in a Algebra 2 class in eighth grade with kids that were 99% MAP scores. She's going into tenth grade now an now some are taking Calc BC, Calc AB and Trig/Calc A this upcoming year. My point is a MAP at this point is meaningless.

    I think that MAP scores become fairly meaningless for gifted kids somewhere in middle elementary.

    Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by millersb02 - 05/10/24 07:34 AM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5