Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 86 guests, and 12 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Amelia Willson, jordanstephen, LucyCoffee, Wes, moldypodzol
    11,533 Registered Users
    October
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,259
    Likes: 8
    I
    indigo Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,259
    Likes: 8
    The Federal Register, Department of Education has posted this item dated Jan 08, 2018 and open for public comment for 61 days (03/09/2018):

    Originally Posted by Federal Register
    One potential strategy that has recently become more popular in upper elementary school grades is to departmentalize instruction, where each teacher specializes in teaching one subject to multiple classes of students instead of teaching all subjects to a single class of students (self-contained instruction). However, virtually no evidence exists on its effectiveness relative to the more traditional self-contained approach. This evaluation will help to fill the gap by examining whether departmentalizing fourth and fifth grade teachers improves teacher and student outcomes. The evaluation will focus on math and reading, with an emphasis on low-performing schools that serve a high percentage of disadvantaged students.
    One could hope that a departmentalized approach might lead to teachers developing in-depth expertise in their niche subject(s) and that this might be conducive to grouping students by readiness and ability, and providing appropriately challenging curriculum for gifted pupils?

    The phrase "student outcomes" may refer to student scores on standardized tests. "Teacher outcomes" may refer to analysis of collected data showing higher student scores overall... or might refer to analysis of collected data indicating closing achievement gaps and excellence gaps.

    Related posts -
    1. Data Collection - Student Longitudinal Data Systems (Oct 2014)
    2. Federal Register - Education Department, Daily Journal (Apr 2014)

    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    E
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    E
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    In my kids' school, this "departmentalizing" happens in fifth grade, but not for the purpose of improving the quality of instruction in the "departments." It happens to give the kids some familiarity with the idea that different subjects will be taught by different teachers, and they will move from room to room for school, in preparation for middle school. The whole class moves together, and the kids get a lot of scaffolding on staying organized and remembering to go to their "lockers" (cubbies) to get the materials that they need for their next class.

    Interestingly, the only subject for which students are grouped by ability is math, which is taught at the same time by all of the fifth grade teachers.

    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    In NZ it doesn't happen until high school although intermediates have specialist teachers for woodwork, cooking etc and I think often music.

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    My DD's school did this in 5th grade. The "science" teacher was the same one DD had all day in a previous grade, who confused evaporation and condensation.

    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,259
    Likes: 8
    I
    indigo Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,259
    Likes: 8
    Locally, courses such as woodwork, cooking, music, etc are known as "electives." At a past point in time, a robust offering of electives was a sign of a strong school system: one in which the students were performing well academically, therefore could engage in classes which were not purely academic in nature but which contributed to being well-rounded persons capable of independent living... college and career ready.

    There may currently be a trend to eliminate electives, freeing time for further academics, job internships, and assessments: increased data collection. sick

    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    Here cooking/woodwork etc used to be known as manual and were compulsory in the last 2 years before high school (equ. Grades 6 and 7) with kids being bussed to a facility at one school in each area if not attending an intermediate. It is the same now but less sexist and i think called something else. Music/Drama are compulsory in skome form up to about 9th grade but how it is covered varies wildly. On the other hand except for sone exposure at primary foreign language is optional.


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Help with WISC-V composite scores
    by aeh - 10/28/24 02:43 PM
    i Am genius and no one understands me!!!
    by Eagle Mum - 10/23/24 04:11 PM
    Classroom support for advanced reader
    by Heidi_Hunter - 10/14/24 03:50 AM
    2e Dyslexia/Dysgraphia schools
    by Jwack - 10/12/24 08:38 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5