Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 342 guests, and 29 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
    #237127 03/14/17 03:53 PM
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    T
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    I just had my first ever Kindergarten GIEP meeting - I felt good about the whole thing, until I started carefully going over the agreement. I understand that the "goals" section is supposed to be vague, but I feel like there are almost no specifics in the short-term or SDI sections either - no real timelines or specific mesurements. Can anyone with more experience weigh in and let me know if this is acceptable. Here are the three sections - sorry if this is a long post:

    II. Goals and Outcomes:
    A. Annual Goal:
    Read and analyze developmentally appropriate texts at the current instructional and
    independent reading level.
    B. Short-Term Learning Outcomes:
    Short Term Objective Objective Criteria Assessment Procedures Timeline
    Given instructional-level reading
    material, the student will apply higher
    -level thinking skills to analyze,
    synthesize and evaluate information
    Complete
    written and oral
    responses to
    literature with a
    minimum score
    of proficient
    based on
    teacher
    established
    rubrics.
    Review of written
    and verbal
    responses
    Established
    rubrics
    Teacher/Student
    conferences
    Teacher
    observation
    Bi-annually
    C. Specially Designed Instruction (include this information for each annual goal)
    SDI Projected Date
    for Initiation
    Anticipated
    Frequency
    Location Anticipated
    Duration
    Provide challenge and require complex
    responses
    Conferencing between student groups
    and teacher
    Flexible grouping
    Small group instruction
    Independent book conferencing with
    teacher
    Assistance provided when needed to
    choose books for independent reading
    that are on her independent reading
    level
    Guided reading instruction using
    higher-level texts
    Extension activities for comprehension
    skills

    A. Annual Goal:
    To develop effective creative thinking and expression in both oral and written
    communication
    B. Short-Term Learning Outcomes:
    Short Term Objective Objective Criteria Assessment Procedures Timeline
    Generate, classify, and evaluate
    ideas, objects, and /or events in
    unique and/or new ways to construct
    original projects that illustrate
    solutions to real-life problems or
    concerns.
    Demonstrate
    proficiency
    evaluating ideas
    and events in
    unique ways as
    well as
    construct
    original projects
    Review of
    solutions
    developed
    Review of work
    products
    Established
    rubrics
    Teacher/Student
    conferences
    Teacher
    observation
    Bi-annually
    C. Specially Designed Instruction (include this information for each annual goal)
    SDI Projected Date
    for Initiation
    Anticipated
    Frequency
    Location Anticipated
    Duration
    Student choice with clearly defined
    outcomes
    Conferencing between student groups
    and teacher
    Provide student with a variety of
    presentation options
    Facilitate problem-based or inquiry
    learning
    Flexible grouping
    Small group instruction
    Direct instruction in methods of
    evaluating alternative solutions
    Direct instructions in creative thinking
    techniques
    Differentiate tasks and assignments to
    foster individual creativity
    Opportunities to work, learn, and
    problem-solve as a member of a group
    Extension activities

    A. Annual Goal:
    Develop higher level thinking skills and apply to various situations and tasks.
    B. Short-Term Learning Outcomes:
    Short Term Objective Objective Criteria Assessment Procedures Timeline
    Select and apply logical/critical
    thinking skills to single and multiple
    solution/open-ended problems
    Demonstrate
    proficiency
    solving single solution
    logic
    problems and
    when
    developing
    appropriate
    and pragmatic
    solutions to
    open-ended
    tasks
    Review of written
    and verbal
    responses
    Review of solutions
    developed
    Review of work
    products
    Established rubrics
    Teacher/Student
    conferences
    Teacher
    observation
    Teacher review of
    student’s written
    and oral responses
    to literature
    Teacher-made
    tests, Curriculum based
    assessments,
    Performance-based
    assessments, &
    Problem-solving
    tasks
    Bi-annually
    C. Specially Designed Instruction (include this information for each annual goal)
    SDI Projected Date
    for Initiation
    Anticipated
    Frequency
    Location Anticipated
    Duration
    Provide challenge and require complex
    responses
    Conferencing between student groups
    and teacher
    Apply higher order thinking skills
    (application, analysis, evaluation, and
    synthesis)
    Small group instruction
    Direct instruction in problem-solving
    strategies
    Direct instruction in methods of
    evaluating alternative solutions
    Direct instructions in creative thinking
    techniques
    Direct instruction in the use of
    inductive and deductive thinking
    Identify student’s interest for
    compacting and substituting work


    Thanks for your patience!

    Joined: Dec 2015
    Posts: 109
    S
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Dec 2015
    Posts: 109
    Hi,
    I have a similar experience too. My kid is in 1st grade and I had his GIEP meeting last week. His GIEP was even more ambiguous. There were lots of jargons and the teacher did explain everything to me. However, I was not sure what they cover as part of the Gifted curriculum in specific. She also showed me a 2nd grade math book that he is currently independently working on and a few other math tiles and packets. The bottom line is there were no specifics with respect to the curriculum. However, I did not worry much as he would be moving to full time gifted classroom from 2nd grade where he would be learning 3rd grade CCSS.
    I would, however, be interested to learn what many of these terms in GIEP mean.

    Joined: Jun 2016
    Posts: 289
    S
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Jun 2016
    Posts: 289
    Wow, I wouldn't be comfortable with that document either.

    sanne #237144 03/15/17 05:37 AM
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    T
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    That's what I was afraid of! What should I be looking for? I want to be armed for our next meeting so that I don't keep going back and forth with them.

    ss62 #237145 03/15/17 05:38 AM
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    T
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    My only saving grace is that we are scheduling another meeting soon to talk about grade acceleration, so I am hoping to bring up my concerns then since they will have to rewrite the GIEP anyway. So I am trying to get prepared now, so I know what to expect.

    Joined: Oct 2013
    Posts: 279
    H
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    H
    Joined: Oct 2013
    Posts: 279
    It looks like they might be writing a cookie cutter GIEP to fit their program instead of writing an individual document to fit your child's individual needs.

    In your document, is there a "Current Levels" or similarly themed section? In your opinion, is it complete as to current grade levels for different classes, leadership skills, etc? IMO, if the current levels section is done very well, the school often has no reasonable choice but to address them (once you point it out).

    If it is not complete, request that they add information (and possibly do testing, not just IQ) until it is complete.

    Joined: Jun 2016
    Posts: 289
    S
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    S
    Joined: Jun 2016
    Posts: 289
    I have never done IEP/GIEP process so I'm not familiar with how the documents are written.

    I would be looking for something I can hold the school accountable for.

    Child will receive 30 minutes of individual instruction in reading per day during [class period] in the [classroom/pullout/library] to focus on [specific literacy goals].

    Child will be provided with sequentially advancing curriculum in all subjects. Child may progress to subsquent levels after showing mastery by [specific score on specific assessment].

    Child will be given [proctored or not? Take home or not?] classroom chapter tests as pre-tests. When Child scores equal to or greater than [specific score] on a pre-test s/he will be provided with [specific alternate curriculum or online resource] to work on [in classroom/library/etc].

    Child will attend [subject] with [specific grade/classroom] during [class period].

    howdy #237148 03/15/17 07:29 AM
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    T
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    The PLEP section is .... ok.....
    Initially they tried to just include the WPPSI-IV and KTEA-3 with some teacher remarks, I pushed for more testing and the reading specialist provided some more information. It is not as thorough as I would like. I have made the point to them that I don't think she would test out of first grade because she hasn't had access to the material (like telling time) but with even a smidgen of prep she would pass by the end of the school year - hence our conversation about acceleration. They also mentioned she was advanced in Math, but never provided a goal for that topic. I signed the NORA in the first meeting just so that she would get "some" instruction while we figure out the kinks, but now I am regretting that. They seem open to more meetings at my request, but I want to be prepared. I know they are looking to add the results from the IOWA Scales to the PLEP so hopefully that helps a bit? I guess I'm just going to have to hammer them on specifics.

    sanne #237149 03/15/17 07:30 AM
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    T
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    That was my feeling too - it is so far from what they provided I feel like I'm in for a fight.
    Thanks for the help.

    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    T
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 62
    The talk in the meeting was all about how this school is so great at differentiating the instruction that these accommodations are things that we do for all of our students etc.... I tried to point out that even if she is in the "accelerated" group - she is still more advanced than those children (she is the only gifted student currently identified in her grade) And then we started talking acceleration. The problem I see with acceleration is that it is a bandaid - when she has access to higher level materials she will still progress faster than her peers meaning in a year or two we'd be looking at acceleration again?! That just seems crazy. We don't have the money for private school, so I really need to find a workable solution with the public school - I just don't know what to do with her, and it seems they don't either. They want to keep her as mainstream as possible and I'm stuck fighting for accommodations I can't even quantify frown

    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by millersb02 - 05/10/24 07:34 AM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5