Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 133 guests, and 13 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    L
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    Dd6.9 is grade skipped and in 2nd grade. Her school administered cogat for selected 2nd graders earlier this year. Dd was exactly 6y6m when she took the test. Anyway, we got the scores today. Fortunately, she has been accepted into the 3rd grade learning enrichment program. However, I am a little surprised at the verbal score. Her sas in verbal is 119, grade percentile rank 47%. Isn't this really low? She completely bombed the picture classification section. What does this mean, if anything? She reads at 5th grade level now and even her teacher has her reading 4th grade level books. She is very articulate and talks both beautifully and with a great sense of humor. I always assumed she has strong verbal abilities. So confused now what the test actually measured. Any ideas?

    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,053
    Likes: 1
    A
    aeh Online Content
    Member
    Online Content
    Member
    A
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,053
    Likes: 1
    CogAT Verbal for 2nd grade is entirely pictorial, and doesn't include any printed words, so it doesn't measure quite the same constructs as are represented by advanced reading ability.


    ...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    L
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    Thanks aeh. I did not know that. So what does the verbal section, specifically the picture classification section measure?

    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 3,363
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 3,363
    [quote=LovemyddHowever, I am a little surprised at the verbal score. Her sas in verbal is 119, grade percentile rank 47%. Isn't this really low? She completely bombed the picture classification section.[/quote]

    I don't think the numbers she has are actually low - they aren't hitting the ceiling gifted, but they aren't low. An SAS of 119 is close to 80th percentile for age. I'm guessing the grade percentile rank that you have is a local percentile for your school district rather than a national percentile; you mentioned that the Cogat was only given to a select group of 2nd graders, presumably students who are thought to be possibly gifted - this right away takes out lower ability students from the bell curve that's used to compute percentiles from local scores. I wouldn't worry or overthink the 47th percentile for grade. (Again - take this with a grain of salt - I'm not a professional, just guessing based on what I understand of CogAT scores).

    I also wouldn't worry too much about the CogAT in general - there are quite a few of us here with students who score very high on individually administered ability tests such as the WISC and yet didn't score anywhere near as high on the CogAT (my ds is one of these kids). One difference between the CogAT and the WISC is that CogAT is a "learned ability" test whereas WISC is an "innate" ability test - meaning the scores on the CogAT can be impacted by acquired knowledge and learning environment.

    That's awesome that your dd has been accepted into the 3rd grade learning enrichment program!

    Best wishes,

    polarbear


    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 647
    K
    Kai Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    K
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 647
    Agreeing with aeh. Years ago I gave my son the 2nd grade CogAT and watched as he misinterpreted several pictures while knowing full well what the words meant.

    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    L
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    Thanks polarbear. I am very proud of my dd for doing so good despite being young for grade. I have read many posts on this board to know not to take cogat scores very seriously.
    Kai, thanks for sharing your personal experience with the picture classification test. I can see dd doing that.


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:30 PM
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:21 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5