Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 312 guests, and 30 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 128
    R
    ruazkaz Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    R
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 128
    My DS11's initial application in 2012 to DYS was denied and I plan to resubmit an application based on(10 years old when he took it)his WISC IV results:

    Verbal Comprehension (scaled score 17, 19, 17) 146
    Perceptual Reasoning (scaled score 15, 13, 19) 135
    Working Memory (scaled score 13, 15) 123
    Processing Speed (scaled score 11, 14) 115
    FSIQ 140

    The report does not include a GAI. I calculated this by summing the VC and PR scaled scores for a total of 100 which equated to a GAI of 150 which puts him at 99.9% if I did everything correctly?

    The limited reading I did suggests that if the difference between FSIQ and GAI exceeds 7 points then the GAI should be considered? More importantly, I believe his GAI may help him qualify for the DYS so I want to draw attention to it if it does aid him?

    Assuming I calculated it correctly, my questions are 1) would my son’s application be stronger with the GAI; 2) if the application would be stronger with the GAI listed is it ok to state the GAI in the application showing the calculation or do I need to request the psychologist to redo the report and state the GAI?

    When I initially submitted the application, my son had a qualifying IQ score but it no full report. In lieu of a portfolio, I submitted his final exam on EPGY’s Algebra which I thought demonstrated he was working 4-5 grade levels ahead. By the time I resubmit I plan to have a qualifying SAT score and the full IQ report.

    Thanks.

    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 690
    K
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    K
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 690
    Our tester submitted a written report in which she stated why the FSIQ was not the best estimate of ds's abilities and why the GAI was and she calculated both scores.

    I would ask your tester for her opinion and for some written elaboration.

    Your ds only needs one score above 145 to qualify but if your tester is willing to calculate the GAI. I believe that's done when there's more than two standard deviations between indices, but I could be wrong. I don't quite remember off hand...

    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 45
    P
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 45
    I also get a GAI of 150 using the using the WISCIV Technical Report #4 and your son's subscale scores.

    Our tester cited Flanagan and Kaufman (2004) "Essentials of WISC-IV Assessment" stating that the GAI may be calculated as a measure of general intellectual ability if the difference between composite scores is 23 points or more, as long as the difference between VCI and PRI is less than 23 points. Your sons scores meet those criteria. Others use slightly different criteria, but I don't think anyone says it "must" be calculated and thus not every tester will do it. It seems it would be worth asking your tester if he/she thinks it would be appropriate to add it to the report.


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by indigo - 05/01/24 05:21 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5