Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    1 members (mithawk), 332 guests, and 29 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    I found it very interesting that they do it this way for DS5 and wondered if it meant change is afoot and grouping was coming back in. He also gets differentiated homework--in fact, his HW is at about the second grade level most days, but I believe his teacher is making a special effort for him there.

    DD9 did not get any grouping at all at this age, though she was at a different school. DS's teacher is young. I believe this is her third year. DD's teacher was probably on year 15-20 and very much operated in "This is how I do and this is how I have always done it" mode.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    The only differentiation that we've seen with Connections in secondary (or primary, for that matter) is pretty blunt.

    a) "special" electives-- in Literature, grades 3-8. Which is great. It was definitely a highlight for my DD, but then again, she LOVES reading, and loves analysis. Lots of discussing, sharing special (individual) projects, etc. Junior Great Books. Which I mention only because many of those same literature selections have reappeared throughout the honors/AP high school curriculum. Yes, that's right-- apparently not only do kids at high LOG not get much in the way of authentic differentiation to meet their needs, they also (unlike the kids who aren't designated gifted) get to see things TWICE. sick DD was not slow to pick up on this, by the way.

    b) Math-- compacting and acceleration, but NOT self-paced. Well, okay-- sometimes, but only if they know you and you ask, and it costs them nothing because you will be doing all the work and supplying materials. And even then, it may not make it onto a transcript. Self-paced work is discouraged in secondary. Strongly discouraged.

    c) secondary, all science is "leveled" as honors/GT, standard, or basic skills. No differentiation beyond that, and you MAY NOT work self-paced. Social studies is leveled in high school courses. Nothing else is, however-- not electives, not languages.

    d) AP coursework exists-- kind of. That is, they have a pretty list of courses on their marketing materials, but what they don't tell you is that about 30-40% of that is actually available in YOUR state. At best.

    On the other hand, they DO allow acceleration pretty readily-- but mostly that happens in primary, because in secondary, they expect students to work synchronously. The honors track in secondary is most appropriate for bright-not-quite-gifted students. You can imagine what that means for an EG/PG student, even one who has been accelerated.


    Cricket's description sounds lovely. I've never heard of anyone in our state getting anything close to that.


    Oh, and UM-- I do think that tracking/grouping is coming back into vogue. That is how Connections does things with their "Honors/AP" track, after all-- it's just that if that is all that happens, it may well be inadequate, and in some ways worse than nothing at all, because administrators turn it around and tell you "Yes, but.... advanced group! Shiny!"


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    2e & long MAP testing
    by millersb02 - 05/10/24 07:34 AM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5