Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 133 guests, and 19 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    #158026 05/23/13 06:18 PM
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 26
    Junior Member
    OP Offline
    Junior Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 26
    By their rubric, he misses the gifted cut-off by 1 pt (needs 9, he got 8). Report didn't really mention knowledge acquisition and retention, so when I asked about that, they informed me that he hadn't even had a year's worth of academic growth in reading, so clearly there's not sign of accelerated acquisition (are you kidding me, he didn't have a year's worth of growth????? What are they doing???? He scored in the 98% on the WIAT in reading comprehension for goodness sake and his independent reading level at home is way beyond his instructional level at school...) When trying to give evidence of early language and development (from way back in the toddler years) it was dismissed as just because I'm educated and paid lots of one-on-one attention and likely all the rest of the kids will be caught up by third grade anyway (really, you think the third graders are all going to know their presidents by sight, because my 2-year-old did!! He's been arguing semantics with us ever since he learned to talk, so don't tell me he's only good at decoding and not the other aspects of reading/language use....)

    When we asked about the discrepancy between the visual tests and how well he did, and the auditory-based tests and how they were significantly lower, and asked if there might be an underlying auditory processing problem, they said he's still doing above average and if we want to pursue that we have to do it on our own. Which, now we know apparently there's a gap between ability and achievement, since he didn't get a year's growth in reading, so we just might have to...

    They reiterated how he doesn't want to do the math worksheets that he's given the option of doing and that he doesn't get the in-class independent assignments for his reading group done because he'd rather sit and read his own books. So they said they are offering him enrichment and he is choosing not to take it and that needs to be his choice and not something he's forced to do. Then I asked if there was a kiddo that needed remediation, if they could just choose not to do their work too and it would be acceptable? They said that was completely different. I asked what they were doing to help him organize and get the work done if that was an area of concern and that said that wasn't a gifted issue so we wouldn't be talking about that at this meeting and the goal is to be developing independence.

    Overall it was just frustrating... They did agree to have him monitored by the gifted teacher and she would be meeting with his teacher next year and giving him some Jr. Great books to read in second grade and continue to give him enrichment papers to do on top of the regular math work.... And they said we can meet at any time if we have concerns that need to be addressed, and said that's all the GIEP would provide anyway, just a yearly meeting and nothing more.... We're basically just watching and waiting how things go next year in second grade, and they said they'd get good baseline measurements at the beginning of the year so we could monitor growth in second grade and how he probably just needed to mature a little bit more and then everything would be fine... I could go on, but it was just frustrating.


    Where to go from here? Besides banging my head against the wall. I just want ds to be learning at his level and not hating school.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    They said that was completely different.


    Well, suuuuuure. Because THAT student is likely to be a drag on meeting AYP benchmarks come NCLB testy-test-test time.

    Completely different. Gaaaa... crazy

    I have no real advice for you, other than perhaps making a formal request for evaluation under IDEA-- a "complete evaluation, not limited in scope" is the phrase-that-pays there.

    If they give you grief, show them Lillie-Felton. He doesn't have to be "failing" to warrant evaluation.


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    Everyone repeat after me "extra worksheets are not enrichment!"


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:30 PM
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:21 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5