Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 272 guests, and 18 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,489
    B
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,489
    "Autistic kid 'smarter than Einstein' predicted to win Nobel Prize"
    http://t.co/RxXSSUbGq4

    I am glad this kid is being appropriate challenged, and that those who tested him at two were incorrect that he would never read. But the the "predicted to win Nobel Prize" part bothers me.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Well, that's just silly.

    Even people at elite levels in their own fields are notoriously poor at predicting the behavior and decision-making of the Nobel committee. EJ Corey reportedly (as in, I heard this anecdote from someone who witnessed this FIRSTHAND as a post-doc) held a spot above the mantel in his formal living room for his Nobel Prize. For years and years. It took over a decade for his greatness to be recognized alongside his rival Herbert Brown. wink Which evidently really rankled, incidentally. At least Corey didn't have to split the prize, which must have made for some really interesting discussions, don't you think? LOL.

    Everyone in the sciences (and I don't know, but probably in other disciplines as well) understands that the vicissitudes of what is "trending" at a particular time dictate who wins and who doesn't as much as actual great contributions do. This is particularly true in fields where massive collaborative efforts are the norm-- the Nobel mostly goes to pairs and very small groups.

    But yeah, way to set up completely unrealistic expectations for this obviously brilliant and very promising... child. {sigh}


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    I'd much rather read more actual factual information about this boy rather than what may happen someday in the future. That's just ridiculous.

    But I admit, I love hearing / reading stories about kids with diagnoses when they were little who really pulled through and things turned out very different from what was predicted for them. Having one of these children at home (DS3.2), I can see a lot more in him than what some of the specialists see. He has already proved them wrong in some areas so I do have hopes for the future. We don't need him to have IQ of 170, just a good life smile

    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 1,228
    2
    22B Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    2
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 1,228
    The probability of him winning the Nobel prize, is higher than the probability of him being austistic.

    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    I just did little extra reading on this young guy and the Einstein comparison came from his own work from couple years ago where supposedly at the age of 9 years old he built some mathematical models that were expanding on Einstein's work.

    Interesting kid, to say the least!

    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,489
    B
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,489
    Originally Posted by 22B
    The probability of him winning the Nobel prize, is higher than the probability of him being austistic.

    No, it's quite likely he is autistic since officially aspergers is now considered part of the autism spectrum. It's not uncommon for highly functioning autistic kids to also be PG. On the other hand it is VERY VERY rare to win a Nobel Prize.

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    I think it's terribly unfair to put that kind of pressure on a kid. They're setting him up to feel like a failure if he doesn't get a Nobel prize, which is hardly the truth.

    I've seen this before: kid has fabulous talent; kid gets lots of publicity; kid is taught by trusted people around him that he is THE BEST!!!!! ...kid can't handle it when he gets into the world and discovers he's not THE BEST!!!!!

    It's not the kid's fault, but he has to suffer with the consequences.

    And I am very tired of the media making comparisons to Einstein.

    Last edited by Val; 05/15/13 12:46 PM.
    Joined: Jun 2012
    Posts: 978
    C
    CCN Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Jun 2012
    Posts: 978
    Originally Posted by Val
    And I am very tired of the media making comparisons to Einstein.

    I know. (sigh) Me too.

    I think I've seen this boy interviewed (if it's the same one, he's very articulate and high functioning). I hope he ends up ok in spite of the media silliness.

    Joined: Jun 2012
    Posts: 978
    C
    CCN Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Jun 2012
    Posts: 978
    Originally Posted by Mk13
    But I admit, I love hearing / reading stories about kids with diagnoses when they were little who really pulled through and things turned out very different from what was predicted for them. Having one of these children at home (DS3.2), I can see a lot more in him than what some of the specialists see. He has already proved them wrong in some areas so I do have hopes for the future. We don't need him to have IQ of 170, just a good life smile

    Yes!! smile smile

    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 15
    G
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    G
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 15
    Originally Posted by Val
    I think it's terribly unfair to put that kind of pressure on a kid. They're setting him up to feel like a failure if he doesn't get a Nobel prize, which is hardly the truth.

    No doubt! I couldn't agree more. Maximum agreement!

    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    2e & long MAP testing
    by millersb02 - 05/10/24 07:34 AM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5