Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 312 guests, and 30 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    #142981 11/17/12 12:11 PM
    Joined: Oct 2012
    Posts: 351
    G
    gabalyn Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    G
    Joined: Oct 2012
    Posts: 351
    My DD 10 has always seemed normal to me. Bright to be sure, but normal bright. I went back and forth about whether to test, but finally did. I had her tested by a friend who is a fellow homeschooler who has known my daughter for several years. When I arrived to pick her up, my friend was explaining some of the scoring to her. My friend told me "it" looked like it would come in around 154. (I'm not sure what "it" is. Perhaps VCI.) She told me that her perceptual skills were "just as strong." She said she hit the ceiling on three subtests, and so would be using the extended norms. And the only other thing I remember that my friend said is that her working memory was 126.

    I should be getting the full report in a few days, but I'm having trouble being patient. I find myself thinking that my friend must have made a mistake, or spoken too soon. I'm not sure how these things get scored, and I wonder whether she could possibly know those numbers within minutes of finishing the test. On the other hand, I tell myself she probably wouldn't have thrown those numbers around unless she were pretty sure.

    Oh my, it is hard to wait with just a little information. I feel as though I can't even start wondering what it means because I don't really know yet. I won't let myself believe the numbers until I see them in writing. I also see myself "undoing" it. ("Gee, maybe my friend made a mistake, or my daughter just got very lucky in terms of the questions that were on the test.") What is that about?! (Rhetorical question... Years of therapy and I think I do actually know the answer to that.)

    Thanks for "listening!"

    gabalyn #142988 11/17/12 02:22 PM
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    Assuming your friend is a qualified tester and not someone who bought the test off the internet... yup :-)

    I see now that I go and look that you did answer my question on your other thread about why test - it drives me mad about this forum that there's no way (unless I'm missing it, in which case someone please tell me!) to be sure you see later posts on a thread you posted on. Both your answers make more sense in the context of denial, I have to say, so I think your main challenge is "don't do that"! (To summarise crudely, you said you wanted external validation and that you wanted to know whether you were challenging her enough. The former is really between you and your therapist :-) and the latter, well, the IQ numbers may give you a new perspective if you're lucky, but to tell whether you're challenging her enough you have to look at her, not her scores. As you know :-)


    Email: my username, followed by 2, at google's mail
    ColinsMum #142989 11/17/12 02:45 PM
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 192
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 192
    Originally Posted by ColinsMum
    it drives me mad about this forum that there's no way (unless I'm missing it, in which case someone please tell me!) to be sure you see later posts on a thread you posted on.

    When you post, click the box below where you type that says, "Add this thread to my Watched Topics. Then next time you get on, click My Stuff->Watch Lists->Watched Topics.

    I rarely remember to do it myself but when I do it's helpful. smile

    W'sMama #142992 11/17/12 03:01 PM
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    Ah, thank you, W's Mama! The stupid thing is that now that you say it, I have known this in the past, but not well enough to remember it, much less remember to do it...


    Email: my username, followed by 2, at google's mail
    ColinsMum #142994 11/17/12 03:12 PM
    Joined: Oct 2012
    Posts: 351
    G
    gabalyn Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    G
    Joined: Oct 2012
    Posts: 351
    [quote]
    Originally Posted by ColinsMum
    Assuming your friend is a qualified tester and not someone who bought the test off the internet... yup :-)

    Hah! Yes, my friend is a licensed school psychologist. Shoulda said that!

    gabalyn #142998 11/17/12 09:00 PM
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 40
    N
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    N
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 40
    I so don't understand extended norms. My dd hit ceilings on I think 6 in the SBV but didn't get extended norms. FSIQ on the SBV came in at 145, 99.9th

    Joined: Jun 2010
    Posts: 1,457
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jun 2010
    Posts: 1,457
    Originally Posted by ninjanoodle
    I so don't understand extended norms. My dd hit ceilings on I think 6 in the SBV but didn't get extended norms. FSIQ on the SBV came in at 145, 99.9th
    The term "extended norms" applies to the WISC-IV. The SB-V has EXIQ (extended IQ) scoring, but only for a testee whose FSIQ is 150+ to begin with.


    Striving to increase my rate of flow, and fight forum gloopiness. sick
    gabalyn #143003 11/18/12 01:09 AM
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 40
    N
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    N
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 40
    Oh thanks!! Makes perfect sense now.


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by indigo - 05/01/24 05:21 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5