Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 145 guests, and 10 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    Yeah--there's a theory (I'm not sure how much credence it still has) that part of the rise in ASDs has to do with the increasing value of ASD-ish skills (think IT) to society. Thus, these people have income and cluster together and marry and reproduce. I read a long article in Wired about it once.

    However, it seems to me that we keep finding out more potential causes for ASD. Age of father is a big new one, right?

    In my own family, we absolutely see unusual, prodigy-like skills combined with ASD-type personalities. AFAIK, only one person was ever diagnosed. One person should have been, according to all who knew him, but he was also a literal mathematical genius who would be well known to anyone with a serious mathematical background.

    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 1,478
    Z
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Z
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 1,478
    Funny thing, I went to the Autism-Spectrum Quotient quiz at Wired that was used for that study:
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aqtest.html

    Did my own thumbnail analysis of the content and came up with these categories of questions versus personality:
    (50 total questions)
    3 Distinctly ASD
    6 Related to creative (scored for negative)
    4 Detail-oriented
    13 Empathy related (scored for negative)
    15 Fairly classical gifted traits
    9 Introverted
    (YAMV)

    It's a lot like the MMPI: you can draw nothing realistic from middle high score tendencies, but can only really look at the scores that cross into the diagnostic range.

    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    I don't think I've seen that particular quiz before. I scored very low (7). I took it "as" my DD, scoring everything as high as possible on questions that would give her ASD "points," (So I inflated a bit) and got a 27. That's completely typical of every such (obviously nonprofessional) test/quiz I've ever taken for her. Gray area.

    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    The specialist in women and girls with Aspergers that we have been consulting actually uses that test as a pre-screener in the paperwork she sends out prior to a first appointment (NOT a diagnostic tool). She obviously thinks it's somewhat useful.

    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    I scored 32 ... I certainly displayed a lot of aspergerish traits when I was younger and still do ... now, the question is ... was it because I had/have asperger's ... or because I was gifted? lol

    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    Interesting, MumofThree. I noticed that they didn't have anything sensory on that one, which seemed like a big omission to me. (My own score seems too low to me; I definitely have more than a touch of SPD.)

    DD doesn't check any of the boxes for ASD regarding social stuff and pretend play on that one. She's even the other direction. However, detail-oriented? Blunt? Absolutely.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by ultramarina
    Interesting, MumofThree. I noticed that they didn't have anything sensory on that one, which seemed like a big omission to me. (My own score seems too low to me; I definitely have more than a touch of SPD.)

    DD doesn't check any of the boxes for ASD regarding social stuff and pretend play on that one. She's even the other direction. However, detail-oriented? Blunt? Absolutely.

    Can I remember details, strings of numbers? Nope.

    Sometimes I don't realize that the forest has any trees.

    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    Ultramarina - I was thinking about this after I posted and I am pretty sure that the screener the psychologist used was 95% identical, but I do think it did not have at least one of these questions and may have had one or two extras. I will try to find time to compare the two. But I wonder if she is using a slightly updated/modified version?

    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    Oh, this just makes me laugh and sigh:

    "A further research paper indicated that the questionnaire could be used for screening in clinical practice, with scores less than 26 indicating that a diagnosis of Asperger syndrome can effectively be ruled out."

    (Wikipedia)

    Again, I scored DD at...27. (I intentionally scored "up" a bit, answering "strongly agree" or "strongly disagree" in some instances when it was more like like "agree"--they don't have that option on this one).

    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    Looks like this may be the child version: http://autismresearchcenter.com/docs/papers/2008_Auyeung_etal_ChildAQ.pdf


    ETA: this link is better:

    http://www.autismresearchcentre.com/arc_tests

    I get a 58 for DD on the child version, interestingly--significantly higher than average for typically developing girls, but well below the diagnostic cut-off of 76.

    Last edited by ultramarina; 11/15/12 09:00 AM.
    Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:30 PM
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:21 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5