Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 395 guests, and 14 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 1 of 2 1 2
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    epoh Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    So... got my sons' CogAT scores (I didn't even know they had done it!) I was given percentiles only:

    Verbal: 91
    Quantitative: 99
    Nonverbal: 99
    Composite: 99
    Interactive Score Profile : 9E (V-N+)

    So, this is basically confirmation that he is very visual-spatial, right? They mention on the little sticker that "He has a significant weakness in verbal reasoning and a significant strength in nonverbal (spatial) reasoning." I'm not sure I totally understand how anything over 90th percentile can be called a 'significant weakness' but whatever. Is there anything I can do to encourage the verbal side? I was kind of surprised that score was so much lower, seeing as DS LOOOOOOVES to talk and tell stories. He could talk for days it seems sometimes.


    ~amy
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 58
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 58
    significant in that context means "statistically significant" which means that the gap between his verbal reasoning and his other forms of reasoning is really there and not due to issues in the test administration or other types of testing error.

    It doesn't mean that it is "significant" meaning that it is huge.

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    epoh Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    That's what I assumed, but the phrasing there was wonky. Lol


    ~amy
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    L
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    I can't seem to get the link to work, but Riverside has a teacher's booklet ("A Short Guide for Teachers") that I found very helpful for interpreting scores. It should come up if you google Riverside plus the title.

    I just glanced at it quickly so you should take a closer look, but your DS's profile, 9E (V-N+) seems to demonstrate and extreme (E) difference statistically (24+ points) between areas, but the mid stanine is a 9, which is the highest level. So, the pattern shows that all of his areas significantly above average, but the pattern is uneven. The point of the interpretive score is to aid in shoring up relative weaknesses and encouraging strengths.

    Honestly, I wouldn't change anything you are doing because of this score. He is clearly well above average in verbal and it is possible that the discrepancy may be due to something besides ability (maybe he had a rough day, wasn't feeling well when he took it, or as many HG/PG kids might do, interpreted the verbal questions differently than the testers intended).

    I find it weird, though, that they did not give you a composite score or say whether the percentiles refer to age or grade (apparently they calculate both).


    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    epoh Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    I was actually surprised they shared what they did. There must be a state law regarding it. This school district clearly has little interest in doing anything with these scores. smirk


    ~amy
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    L
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    I believe there is a federal law that they have to share your child's educational records with you. You could probably insist on seeing more, but it's probably not worth the trouble.


    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    epoh Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    True, true. I did ask his teacher if they do any follow-up testing for kids who score high. I doubt it, but might as well ask.

    ETA: The scores were for Age, not grade.

    Last edited by epoh; 12/10/11 07:47 AM.

    ~amy
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 833
    F
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    F
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 833
    Our district doesnt give the stanines... of course they cant because they only administer the verbal and non verbal portions of the test. They also score the test based on age. They do not give the above level test so therefore a kid like dd who is the oldest in the class needs a near perfect score to meet our district cut off. She missed 4 questions on the non verbal and 3 on verbal and did not make the program.

    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    L
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    epoh, do they not use it as a screener for the gifted program? That is what our district uses it for (well, one of the uses). Kids who score high are then given an achievement test and the teacher's do an evaluation.

    Not sure what the point of buying and administering the test is if they are not going to do anything with the results. In addition, while the test does have some problems, theoretically it should provide useful information about every student's strength and weaknesses that should inform the strategies the school uses to educate them.

    That is too bad that they don't take it seriously.

    As for the grade vs age scores, I have mixed feelings. I have a early September baby and a late May baby. So my 2nd was 9 months younger than my first when he started kindergarten. 9 months is a big difference at that age.

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 14
    N
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    N
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 14
    Epoh....I am sending you a PM since we are both in the same situation with our kiddos on the COGAT.

    Page 1 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5