Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 455 guests, and 11 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    #115469 11/03/11 09:12 PM
    Joined: Apr 2009
    Posts: 1,032
    N
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    N
    Joined: Apr 2009
    Posts: 1,032
    We had our annual IEP meeting today for DS9, and I found out that they recently gave him another WISC-IV test. Consensus is that it still doesn't reflect him with great accuracy, but it was interesting.

    He maxed out the Working Memory thing for the most part, and that was his highest score. He scored right at Average for Processing Speed Perceptual Reasoning, which was his lowest score. Everything else was Superior, Very Superior, and I think one High Average.

    The tester said that the test just isn't smart enough for his kind of reasoning. There was a type of question where he had to pick things that were most closely related and he spent his time musing on the interconnectedness of all things, as Douglas Adams would say. He was making connections that made perfect sense, but were clearly not what the test had in mind, and it showed on his score. I think the problem is that this kind of kid thinks everything is a trick question. It just can't be that simple, right?

    So he had 99th percentile on Working Memory, and 16th percentile on the bit where he was off thinking in the clouds. My kid, master of the spread! laugh


    Last edited by Nautigal; 11/04/11 08:56 PM. Reason: fixing things.
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 29
    S
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    S
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 29
    Close psych friend of mine who tests gifted kids has said this subtest is very difficult (to give the "right" answer) for highly abstract thinkers for reasons like you indicated. My son too scored quite poorly on this subtest (compared to others).

    She actually predicted it may be "scrapped" in the next WISC..... And can be an issue in identifying gifted kids, especially as she put it the highly abstract thinking ones.

    Last edited by stephanie; 11/03/11 11:06 PM.
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 2,172
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 2,172
    You might want to edit out the actual test question as they are supposed to be controlled or non-accessible to people who aren't authorized to give these tests.

    FWIW, my dd11 had a similar issue with abstract thinking on parts of an IQ test.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 433
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 433
    Originally Posted by Nautigal
    We had our annual IEP meeting today for DS9, and I found out that they recently gave him another WISC-IV test.


    Are they allowed to test your child without permission? (can you hear the panic in my voice?)

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 433
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 433
    Originally Posted by Nautigal
    Of course, he worked this all out loud, talking through his possibilities, and he did point out the one that was the right answer, which was *****

    When you get back on forum, you should delete any reference to exact questions used on the test. Gotta make it fair for everyone wink

    Joined: Apr 2009
    Posts: 1,032
    N
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    N
    Joined: Apr 2009
    Posts: 1,032
    Per suggestions, removed some bits. It's not much of a funny story anymore! Sorry, didn't figure any kiddos would be reading and memorizing. That was stupid.

    Also fixed my mistake -- I'll take "things that start with P" for 100, Alex. Perceptual Reasoning it is, not Processing Speed. And the other scores were all Superior or Very Superior, with that one Average. You can tell I have no working memory, myself.

    Oh, and I'm sure we've probably signed a blanket permission for whatever tests they feel like giving him -- they're pretty good about proper paperwork, so there must be something on file that let them do it without a new permission form. I don't mind tests, as they are always at least entertaining if not informational.

    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    L
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 288
    My DS hasn't done a WISC yet, but I have this concern with the CogAT he just took at school as a screener for the gifted program. And in that test, you can't explain your answer to the tester.

    They worked on some practice prep in class beforehand just to get them familiar with the types of questions and boy do I hope the actually questions were better written than the practice ones! I remember reading ds's answer to one fill in the blanks in the sentence question in which his answer made total sense to me, but was clearly not the intended response.


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by SaturnFan - 05/15/24 04:25 PM
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by SaturnFan - 05/15/24 04:14 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5