So the neuropsych results were interesting. We got lucky and found out about the adderall shortage in time to save her meds for test days and started trialing new meds the rest of the time. She needed WAY more time for testing so one rec is to have a SLP eval to see if she has fluency issues. She was confirmed to have a SLD in Written Expression, re-confirmed her DCD/dysgraphia dx (visual motor issues in 2019, graphomotor issues added), and now we know she's autistic as well. Her provisional dyslexia dx was removed as those issues in 2019 weren't present now, so they were likely unmedicated-ADHD related.
She's got an asynchronous profile, even with significant differences in her GAI and EGAI subtests. According to the 3rd technical report, her expected FSIQ was 152-160 based on her WASI-II FSIQ, but that's definitely not what she scored.
FRI-140
-Matrix Reasoning 20
-Figure Weights 14
-Arithmetic 11
-Picture Concepts 16
**Figure Weights Extra Time 20
Difference between Matrix Reasoning and Figure Weights was significant with <8.0% base rate.
Difference between FRI & WMI was significant with <4.0% base rate.
VSI-126
-Block Design 13 ("She completed nearly all the designs within the time limit, except for the last one.")
-Visual Puzzles 16
**Block Design Extra Time 15
**Block Design Partial Score 17 ("Her score for number of blocks in correct positions within the time limit best reflects her skills.")
**Visual Puzzles Extra Time 19
Difference between Block Design and Block Design Partial was significant with 1.4% base rate.
VCI-130
WMI-107
PSI-108
FSIQ-129, GAI-136, EGAI-126, VECI-119
CPI-109, EFI-135, QRI-114, NVI-134
Obviously, none of the composite scores meet criteria for DYS, but does DYS look at the subtest level? I'm not really sure if the variety of conditions/scores for Figure Weights, Block Design, and Visual Puzzles, would mean that she would qualify.
