Thank you aeh. It will work out well to just have him take the 2-5 in the fall and then talk about transitioning to the 6+ when we get those results.
Reading over the info on page 5, it looks like the 6+ would be a better measure because DS is working in a lot of the areas covered by the 6+ and will likely make significant progress in those areas over the summer. I wish that the results would correlate to actual grade levels, not just give %ile ranks. The %iles are especially useless when 99th %ile is so far below the score DS got. The teachers don't seem to quite know what the scores mean either. Certainly no one is willing to look at DS's MAP score and actually base his math instruction off of it. Which makes me wonder why he has to take the test to begin with?
