At age seven, the two 19s would suggest ceiling subtest scores. 18, not. He's very near the beginning of the norms, so there should have been plenty of space to score a 19. In any case, Loy's point is well-taken. He would be appropriate for extended norms for the VCI, GAI, and FSIQ, based on having two max subtest scores. There are ExIQ tables available for the SBV, as well.
And, where you see motor impacts in real life, you may also want to have in the background the possibility of 2e, most likely of the motor coordination/dyspraxic/dysgraphic variety. If it exists, once documented, this allows for 504/IEP accommodations such as supplementary oral assessment, reduced written responses, items sufficient only to demonstrate mastery, etc. If you have individually-administered achievement testing, it is possible that you already have much of the data necessary to initiate this process.
