Having looked at the document that's the source of all this controversy, I have to say that anyone who is getting upset about specific items being left out is arguing a straw man, given that we're talking about a 50-page outline for a 180-hour course.

http://media.collegeboard.com/digit...-history-course-and-exam-description.pdf

Looking through, I see several items that refer explicitly to the emergence of a distinct national identity and the benefits of the free market, so I have to wonder what document the critics are reading.

Last edited by Dude; 09/23/14 07:41 AM. Reason: I fail math