Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 315 guests, and 40 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    #75321 05/03/10 08:40 AM
    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    M
    Mam Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    I looked at my dd's WJ-III test results yesterday when replying to somebody else's thread and something caught my eye.

    I had not noticed that her total achievement is the lowest of all her composite scores.

    Broad reading was 157 (scores range 153-159)
    Broad Math was 144 (128-154 range)
    Broad Written Language 149 (135-148)

    Total achievement is 142. So while her reading/math are in the >99.9 and her math is 99.8, the broad ends up being 99.8 as well.

    I have no concerns, just curiosity as to how the composite is calculated. It seems odd that it would be the lowest....

    I finally understood that the full scale IQ can be higher than its parts because of the rarity of 2 or 3 high scores....

    Is it not the case with achievement?

    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    M
    Mam Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    She was 6 years 7 months when she took it, just as she started 1st grade.

    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    M
    Mam Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    Yes, thanks.. it is weird because it is lower even than her lowest; but it really does not matter. Funny I had not noticed before...

    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    M
    Mam Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    Wow! That is a BIG difference!

    It just doesn't make any sense that it would be lower. Wonder if it can be a mistake or just a weird design issue.

    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    M
    Mam Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    Thanks again, that seems like a big glitch.

    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 3
    F
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    F
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 3
    Is this for every age. Using it for my duaghter for early entry testing, how perfect does she need to be with this scoring glitch to get 98%.

    BEth


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5