Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 216 guests, and 18 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Word_Nerd93, jenjunpr, calicocat, Heidi_Hunter, Dilore
    11,421 Registered Users
    April
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
    Joined: Mar 2015
    Posts: 282
    G
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    G
    Joined: Mar 2015
    Posts: 282
    Originally Posted by aeh
    If the index scores are all below 140, then differences resulting from use of the extended norms probably reflect outliers among the subtest scores, which means additional clinical interpretation is necessary anyway.
    Aeh, what about those who had 1 19 and a bunch of 17s and indices in the 140s? Is the thinking that extended norms might make a little difference but not a significant one?

    Last edited by George C; 07/08/15 04:23 PM.
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,051
    Likes: 1
    A
    aeh Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,051
    Likes: 1
    George, yes, that is the thinking. You would only be able to apply extended norms to the single subtest with a 19. The maximum scaled score possible, even with extended norms, would be 28. This might have a moderate effect on the index score in question, but a negligible effect on the FSIQ. The trade-offs with switching to the extended norms, which were developed from a fairly small norm group of HG+ children (versus the standard norms, based on thousands of data points), are not worth the relatively small improvement in spreading the curve.


    ...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,051
    Likes: 1
    A
    aeh Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 4,051
    Likes: 1
    sigep,

    The equivalent to a CSI of 132 is an FSIQ or GAI of 130 on the WISC-IV. The GAI should be considered seriously, because there are no equivalents to the WMI and PSI portions of the WISC-IV on InView.


    ...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
    Joined: May 2012
    Posts: 26
    S
    Junior Member
    OP Offline
    Junior Member
    S
    Joined: May 2012
    Posts: 26
    Great thank you aeh. I just want to make sure the school is on the same page. I don't know why they aren't committing to a score on WISC and giving me numbers from InView. It is making me question what they are doing.

    Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

    Moderated by  M-Moderator, Mark D. 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Jo Boaler and Gifted Students
    by thx1138 - 04/12/24 02:37 PM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 04/08/24 12:40 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5