Gifted Issues Discussion homepage
Posted By: Amber New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/20/11 02:31 PM
Hi! My son's preschool teacher directed me to the Davidson's website. After looking over the requirements, it seems my son does not qualify at this time, but I'm happy to have use of this forum!

We had him tested in November, to get an idea of where he falls on the gifted spectrum. I always had a feeling of him being "ahead" but not "gifted" until his teacher used the word. He did learn to read at 2.5, but he has always loved letters, so we kind of just thought, "Oh look how cute, he reads." blush I also have 7 month old twins, so I have not been able to fully research anything like this until now. (My twins were 3 months old when he was tested.) Anyways, onto the scores,

WPPSI-III
Verbal I.Q. 147 Very Superior
Performance I.Q. 129 Superior
Full Scale I.Q. 139 Very Superior

WJ-III (He only did part of this one, to measure his reading ability)
Subtest Grade Equiv. Stand.Score %-ile

BROAD READING COMPOSITE 2.6 129 97
Letter-Word Identification 3.1 136 99
Reading Fluency 2.3 121 92
Passage Comprehension 2.1 121 92

BROAD MATH COMPOSITE
Calculation 2.1 122 93
Math Fluency --- --- ---
Applied Problems 1.0 97 42

(The psych administering the test said he wasn't able to get a valid score on the math portion of the WJ-III)

So my questions are as follows, generally speaking, I know this is highly individual, but looking for a starting point here, how are kids that fall in this range schooled best? His preschool teacher keeps mentioning homeschooling him, which I never really considered. The psych doing the eval said he would be a "fish out of water" at public school, but looking at the hoagies website, it doesn't seem like his scores place him in the range of the student that requires highly differentiated curriculum. So I'm a tad confused. smile He is in Montessori now, and according to his teacher doing well, but having some focusing problems. He also has trouble making friends even though he desperately craves the social interaction. He's a quirky kid, so its hard for him to relate to other kids. He also has some fine motor delay, mostly because he refuses to practice.

Also, I imagine I will want to retest him at some point. I see lots of conflicting info on the best time to test, anywhere from 6-9.

I have reading a lot on this topic, I just finished Ruf's levels of gifted book. I feel that my DS is a level 3 or 4, I find the levels a little hard to differentiate between at times.


Thanks for any help you can offer!
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/20/11 02:35 PM
I'm sorry, I tried to get the scores to line up but when I post it changes it back. For the WJ-III, the first number is grade equiv., the second number is the standard score, and the third number is percentile.
Posted By: sunshine4 Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/20/11 11:59 PM
Hi Amber- our children do seem so similar! Our child has also had a VERY hard time making friends at his regular pre-school, and has also had a hard time initiating and sustaining play. At home, he is such a chatter box and has no problem at all with adults or other older children. He is so interested in them, but has yet to connect with his own age mates at school. I am not sure if this is why, but our psychologist has said it may be because he is ahead of these kids and needs intellectual peers, as well as age peers. It's a constant struggle and it is all so new to us! We also have a fine motor "delay," and our child hates to write, too! I have read that this is a common issue for gifted kids, as well. As for school, we were also told that public school wouldn't be a great option, especially because our school system, although great, has no gifted program at all. We have applied to a few schools in our area that have experience with gifted kids, and one school is specifically for gifted children. We have yet to hear decisions from them, so we will see what happens. I also have a younger child, so homeschooling seems like an unrealistic option for us right now, plus I do think he needs the social piece. I can't wait to read what other people post on the issues you raised! This forum is so helpful when you are new to all of these topics!
Posted By: Mam Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 12:16 AM
Sunshine, good luck with the applications... If you do end up homeschooling, the socialization part is really easy to get. I had that same misconception years ago and have come to realize that there are tons of real socialization opportunities for homeschoolers. Further more, you wouldn't be in such a restrictive environment where kids are only paired with their age mates so it might be easier to connect with "true" peers.

Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 01:33 AM
Originally Posted by sunshine4
Hi Amber- our children do seem so similar! Our child has also had a VERY hard time making friends at his regular pre-school, and has also had a hard time initiating and sustaining play. At home, he is such a chatter box and has no problem at all with adults or other older children. He is so interested in them, but has yet to connect with his own age mates at school. I am not sure if this is why, but our psychologist has said it may be because he is ahead of these kids and needs intellectual peers, as well as age peers. It's a constant struggle and it is all so new to us! We also have a fine motor "delay," and our child hates to write, too! I have read that this is a common issue for gifted kids, as well. As for school, we were also told that public school wouldn't be a great option, especially because our school system, although great, has no gifted program at all. We have applied to a few schools in our area that have experience with gifted kids, and one school is specifically for gifted children. We have yet to hear decisions from them, so we will see what happens. I also have a younger child, so homeschooling seems like an unrealistic option for us right now, plus I do think he needs the social piece. I can't wait to read what other people post on the issues you raised! This forum is so helpful when you are new to all of these topics!

My son is the same way, he relates so well to adult and older children. We looked into a gifted charter, but were not impressed. The student/teacher ratio was high and being a charter, the funds were limited. He could potentially stay at Montessori for another 2 years, I'm not sure how well that's going to work out though.

The part I am confused about is his scores. The psych acted like he had to be either at a private gifted school, or homeschooled. When I read about children who score around the same level, most information says that his range, which is just inside "highly gifted" according to Hoagies, are okay in public school with differentiation or enrichment. I understand each child is individual, and so there are no set in stone rules about this, I guess I am just confused as to why the scores don't mirror what he is saying. I will have to follow up with the psych and get more info.
Posted By: kaibab Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 02:02 AM
Originally Posted by Amber
The part I am confused about is his scores. The psych acted like he had to be either at a private gifted school, or homeschooled. When I read about children who score around the same level, most information says that his range, which is just inside "highly gifted" according to Hoagies, are okay in public school with differentiation or enrichment. I understand each child is individual, and so there are no set in stone rules about this, I guess I am just confused as to why the scores don't mirror what he is saying. I will have to follow up with the psych and get more info.

I'd be quite confused about that also. I really think it's not helpful to give advice about a given score requiring a certain kind of education. Kids really are individuals and personality and local school options matter greatly. Some public schools do a great job with gifted kids and some are lousy. Some private schools do a great job and some are lousy. Some parents want to or can manage to homeschool and it works well with a given child and sometimes it's a disaster. What would work for your child? What school options would be flexible and have similar peers? What options for enrichment exist? What extracurriculars are available in the various options? Can you homeschool or would that be difficult and not something wanted for the family? I think those things matter much more than the score, especially the score for a very young child.
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 02:21 AM
I agree, maybe I just need to back away from the score and figure him out as best I can. He was two weeks shy of his 4th birthday when we tested, so the score may not be as accurate as a score for a 6,7,8 year old.


Thanks for the replies everyone!
Posted By: aculady Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 02:44 AM
A verbal IQ of 147 is more than a full standard deviation above the usual gifted cut off of two standard deviations above the mean. It falls into the "exceptionally gifted" range when you look at the breakdown on the Hoagies' Gifted site. This is higher than the "optimally gifted" range. I would look at the highest score to judge his level of need, because that area is what is going to be the driving force. There is a pretty big gap here between verbal and performance, which pulls down the FSIQ. This is not unusual, and not something I'd be too concerned with at this age, but it is something to watch as he gets older to make sure that it doesn't reflect actual visual or motor issues or an LD.
Posted By: Cricket2 Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 02:58 AM
I am a bit further along this road, so I'll chime in smile . My eldest dd is 12 y/o and highly gifted. She was homeschooled for a bit in elementary and the std school set-up really did not work well for her socially or academically. She is now doing well in public school, though, due to a few factors: she was on the young end when she started (bd just before the cut-off), she skipped 5th grade, middle school in general has been a better fit for her b/c the tracking/acceleration options have been greater & her middle school had about 300 kids/grade so she's been able to find some peers with the older MG-HG kids in her grade, and she's done a lot of extracurricular stuff in her area of interest.

My younger dd is 10 and maybe HG (very erratic but some of her scores are MG and others are EG+). She is also twice exceptional with ADD and an anxiety disorder dx. We haven't been able to homeschool for her due to my needing to maintain a job outside of my work from home stuff. School has not worked at all well for her although I might not have done better at home b/c she and I butt heads so much.

I guess that what I'm getting at is that, like someone else said, what a child needs isn't dictated solely by his IQ numbers. I wouldn't assume that you have to homeschool quite yet unless you want to homeschool. If you are able to do so it certainly does keep options open, though, if the worst case scenario plays out somewhere along his school experience.
Posted By: Grinity Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 12:45 PM
Originally Posted by Amber
When I read about children who score around the same level, most information says that his range, which is just inside "highly gifted" according to Hoagies, are okay in public school with differentiation or enrichment. ... I guess I am just confused as to why the scores don't mirror what he is saying.
Amber - I hate to ask, but could you send a link to exactly what you are looking at from Hoagies that you are reading? It's a big site.

Also - Go back to 5 Levels of Giftedness, and look at the end of the book, and see what Ruf says about this issue. My son is Level 3, but his scores fell a bit differently, and he crossed the DYS cut off line, so even Level 3 is 'gifted enough' that a certain personality of child would get pretty fed up with regular school.

The thing to remember is that 'Gifted' has no standard meaning. Some school districts use 'top 3%' while others use 'top 5%' and a few use 'top 10%.' Your son's verbal abilities are in the top - help me Dottie! - 0.2%, so it isn't a like your kid is '1 in a hundred' is is that he's rarer than that!

Also - getting a school to do 'differentiation and enrichment - to the extent needed' isn't easy, although many of us have achieved it. I think that if done right, a lot of kids with much scores could really enjoy school with differentiation and enrichment - especially subject acceleration.

Remember that your child is really young, and some key 'personality factors' aren't clear yet. The most important data in all of this - to me- is that his current preschool isn't working for him socially even though you have a preschool teacher who knows what Davidson is.

This is key, because MOST preschool teachers have no idea what Davidson is, haven't ever heard of it. This suggests 2 possibilities:
1) You live in a neighborhood where unusually gifted kids aren't so unusual. This is very good news.
2) She has some personal reason to know what Davidson is, and she is 'hinting' that she has vital secret information to share with you if you would like to receive it. Sort of an underground railroad of 'family to family' support.

So go back and ask her about how she has heard of Davidson and ask her to share whatever stories are rattling around in her head about 'gifted.'


Your son's scores are very very close to DYS cutoffs, and remember that 2/3rd of kids in the program are bunched up around the cutoff line - it's because of the shape of the tail. Nowadays the tail is broken off just a bit to the right of your son's scores because the test-makers have acknowledged that they can't really measure differences well up where the air is so thin, and just created a 'hard stop' at 160. But the bottom line is that if you son was invited to a birthday party of a child to happened to have invited all DYS kids, he would have a wonderful time, and you'd be in tears to see him acting so 'normal' among other 'just like him' kids.

And the best news is regardless of the vagaries of 3 points on the Verbal scale, there is a Hoagie's list of conferences that are open to whoever wants to go!

Love and More Love,
Grinity
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 02:21 PM
Originally Posted by aculady
A verbal IQ of 147 is more than a full standard deviation above the usual gifted cut off of two standard deviations above the mean. It falls into the "exceptionally gifted" range when you look at the breakdown on the Hoagies' Gifted site. This is higher than the "optimally gifted" range. I would look at the highest score to judge his level of need, because that area is what is going to be the driving force. There is a pretty big gap here between verbal and performance, which pulls down the FSIQ. This is not unusual, and not something I'd be too concerned with at this age, but it is something to watch as he gets older to make sure that it doesn't reflect actual visual or motor issues or an LD.

He is in OT for fine motor, so this makes perfect sense. I feel good keeping him in it just based on this. We are paying for private OT, he's at the low end of normal so doesn't qualify for free services. Sometimes I wonder if he needs it, but I'd rather him get it and not need it, than the other way around. Thanks for you reply. smile
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 03:02 PM
Originally Posted by Dottie
I just have a few brief comments. First, I was initially not terribly impressed with the reading scores, and was curious about why things weren't adding up in my head. As best I can tell though, his achievement scores were not calculated as an almost 4 year old. Perhaps the tester did that to get the composite score, which isn't always attainable at a younger age. Regardless, the scaled scores he earned are probably considerably higher than the ones listed above. I wanted to point that out, because the 130 level reading scores are much more managable than ones that might be considerably higher. His math is likely in the GT range as well. Do you have anything written along with those scores? A typical computer printout for example will typically share "norms based on <usually child's actual age or grade>".

That changes things somewhat for me. The IQ is also high, but doesn't always answer placement questions either. My son was an early reader, but was never tested in that age range, so I'm not sure how high his achivement might have been. On my older software, I'm getting pretty extreme highs for a kid with your listed GE's that is not yet 4 years old. I think you should absolutely retest him once he's 6 or so.

Just to show that public school can work, my son has been in one for the duration. Well, actually K was private to get around the cutoff. But it hasn't been easy. We've had to take some pretty radical steps as far as acceleration. But for our total family dynamics, having DS IN school was desirable.

I absolutely agree with kaibab that a certain number should never dictate a certain plan. And it bothers me that psychologists will often buy into that. We were told when our son was first tested that many people would want to grade skip him, but that we should never, never do that. She actually advised that he take up tennis instead (????). Long story short, we ignored her advice, and did what we felt best at each step along the way. DS is now 12, and the ship is still afloat, wink .

Having a resource like this site can be a life saver. I suggest you pull up a cyber chair and stick around, grin . Welcome!

Unfortunately, I did not get anything other than the summary I posted. I didn't even receive the subtest scores that I see others posting. I'm going to call the psych tomorrow and ask about the WJ-III scoring and see if I can get a more indepth report. Thank you so much for your insight!

PS, excuse my ignorance, but what are the "GE's?" blush
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 03:12 PM
Originally Posted by Grinity
Originally Posted by Amber
When I read about children who score around the same level, most information says that his range, which is just inside "highly gifted" according to Hoagies, are okay in public school with differentiation or enrichment. ... I guess I am just confused as to why the scores don't mirror what he is saying.
Amber - I hate to ask, but could you send a link to exactly what you are looking at from Hoagies that you are reading? It's a big site.

Also - Go back to 5 Levels of Giftedness, and look at the end of the book, and see what Ruf says about this issue. My son is Level 3, but his scores fell a bit differently, and he crossed the DYS cut off line, so even Level 3 is 'gifted enough' that a certain personality of child would get pretty fed up with regular school.

The thing to remember is that 'Gifted' has no standard meaning. Some school districts use 'top 3%' while others use 'top 5%' and a few use 'top 10%.' Your son's verbal abilities are in the top - help me Dottie! - 0.2%, so it isn't a like your kid is '1 in a hundred' is is that he's rarer than that!

Also - getting a school to do 'differentiation and enrichment - to the extent needed' isn't easy, although many of us have achieved it. I think that if done right, a lot of kids with much scores could really enjoy school with differentiation and enrichment - especially subject acceleration.

Remember that your child is really young, and some key 'personality factors' aren't clear yet. The most important data in all of this - to me- is that his current preschool isn't working for him socially even though you have a preschool teacher who knows what Davidson is.

This is key, because MOST preschool teachers have no idea what Davidson is, haven't ever heard of it. This suggests 2 possibilities:
1) You live in a neighborhood where unusually gifted kids aren't so unusual. This is very good news.
2) She has some personal reason to know what Davidson is, and she is 'hinting' that she has vital secret information to share with you if you would like to receive it. Sort of an underground railroad of 'family to family' support.

So go back and ask her about how she has heard of Davidson and ask her to share whatever stories are rattling around in her head about 'gifted.'


Your son's scores are very very close to DYS cutoffs, and remember that 2/3rd of kids in the program are bunched up around the cutoff line - it's because of the shape of the tail. Nowadays the tail is broken off just a bit to the right of your son's scores because the test-makers have acknowledged that they can't really measure differences well up where the air is so thin, and just created a 'hard stop' at 160. But the bottom line is that if you son was invited to a birthday party of a child to happened to have invited all DYS kids, he would have a wonderful time, and you'd be in tears to see him acting so 'normal' among other 'just like him' kids.

And the best news is regardless of the vagaries of 3 points on the Verbal scale, there is a Hoagie's list of conferences that are open to whoever wants to go!

Love and More Love,
Grinity

I was referring to this table, http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/highly_profoundly.htm

His FSIQ puts him right inside "highly gifted."

I appreciate your response! His preschool teacher is still close with a former PG student who is DYS, so that is where she heard it from.


The part you posted about going to a party with kids like him made me cry just imagining it. LOL! I don't know where he will fit in yet, but I'm going to try my hardest to find somewhere! I can see we have some things to think about, where's that instruction manual this kid was supposed to come with?
Posted By: Grinity Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 04:31 PM
ok, here goes-
First of all, I agree with Acu's idea of just looking at the strongest score - which puts him beyond the highly gifted catagory, but for the sake of argument, lets lowball, and say - ok, he's 'only' HG:

Quote
Level of Giftedness Full Scale IQ score WISC-IV, WPPSI-III
source: Assessment of Children Extended IQ score WISC-IV
source: Technical Report #7 WISC�IV Extended Norms and publisher's 2008 NAGC presentation Full Scale IQ score SB-5
source: Ruf Estimates of Levels of Giftedness Full Scale IQ score WISC-III, WPPSI-R, SB-4, SB L-M
gifted or moderately gifted (G or MG) 130-138 130-145 120-129 130 - 145 (132-148 SB-4)
highly gifted (HG) 138-145 145-160 125-135 145 - 160 (148-164 SB-4)
exceptionally gifted (EG) 145-152 160+ 130-140 160 - 180 (SB L-M only)
profoundly gifted (PG) 152-160 175+ 135-141+ 180 and above (SB L-M only)

HG and Ruf Level 3 are a pretty good match. Most Davidson YSP kids are HG on a table like this one, and Ruf Level 3 is very common there, so be aware that you are running into a difference in definition. I happen to agree with YSP and lump everyone with a Verbal or Performance subscore over 145 into the PG catagory...but I don't deny that kids in that big catagory face very different challenges in their path to adulthood. I also haven't personally seen the value of having an EG and PG seperate catagory, but I dont' deny that there are parents who find it meaningful.

Let's say your kid 'just HG' - so what does that page say about kids who are HG and what they need?

[quote]
Highly gifted children tend to do well in congregated gifted classes, such as offered in a few larger districts across the United States. These classes are most successful when they use a more in-depth curriculum, which also moves at a faster pace. Gifted children are different not only in their faster learning, but by their deeper interest and level of understanding. Both these differences must be addresses in a successful educational situation.
[\quote]
That sounds like an extreme need to me. Don't lump you kid with MG (here we say Optimally Gifted, or OG) when the Full Scale is one point above and the highest subscale is a whole standard deviation above that! If you want to use the logic that one point above the cut off isn't 'real' then you have to commit to the logic of seeing the 147 as 'almost' Davidson YSP - because YSP doesn't care a rat's xxx about Full Scale, only strengths. So lets keep it simple and say yes, By this particular chart 139 is HG, and but a little star there to remind us about the very rare 147 in Verbal (which is what folk happen to see all the time in school, anyway)

If you happen to live in one of the few larger districts that offer a congregated gifted class, then no problem. But do you? If not, then seriously consider homeschooling or gradeskip/subject accelerations - it is possible to make either option work. Ask Dottie to 'fess up about how she got out her giant sheers and made cut and paste out of the standard local public school offerings. Yup, in retrospect she made it all work just fine - and so did I and so will you, in retrospect, whatever choice you choose.

I just want to show you how easy it is to slip into denial:

You said:
When I read about children who score around the same level, most information says that his range, which is just inside "highly gifted" according to Hoagies, are okay in public school with differentiation or enrichment.

What I read on that same exact page is that he needs a congregated full time gifted class with a speically designed challenging and fast curriculum that is ony availible in a few districts.

See what can happen when the 'denial glasses' are on. But good for you for noticing that there is a mismatch somewhere. Go Team!

Love and More Love,
Grinity

Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 05:41 PM
I see exactly what you are saying, thank you for taking my denial glasses off! You are right about that, I think I was trying to downplay it a little bit so I'm not so freaked out about all of this. Lol. I'm working my way back reading all of the past threads to get some ideas as to how to go about schooling this boy.


I truly appreciate everyone's help!
Posted By: Grinity Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 05:48 PM
Originally Posted by Amber
I think I was trying to downplay it a little bit so I'm not so freaked out about all of this. Lol.
If only youwe could change reality by fudging the numbers - we would probably all do the same.

Good for you for reading the back-threads. Lots of brave pioneering families represented there. If you feel like it, make up a summary of 'what we over here have learned' - it think it would be really useful.

Also check out this thread soon -
http://giftedissues.davidsongifted....y_Gifties_Aimee_Yermish_b.html#Post81974

Smiles,
Grinity
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/21/11 06:34 PM
Thank you for the link! I'll check it out.
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/22/11 12:50 AM
Just came across this on his report,

"I personally administered the testing, and the testing results can be considered valid scores. Because *, who was just turning 4, was beyond the norms for Kindergarten, the scores above compare him to beginning 1st graders. Although he did not get a valid score for math fluency, his scores overall suggest that he should start Kindergarten next Fall and be allowed to accelerate particularly in reading."

I'm not sure if this part, "Because ****, who was just turning 4, was beyond the norms for Kindergarten, the scores above compare him to beginning 1st graders." means that he was scored as a first grader, or if his scores are at a first grade level.


(I added the **** where my ds's name was.)
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/22/11 02:02 AM
Originally Posted by Dottie
Did you see my previous post Amber? It sort of snuck in while you were responding to another post. Anyway, that's exactly the conclusion I came to...that he was scored as a beginning 1st grader. The fact that his reading still tests gifted means his actual age based scores are even more extraordinary. The report sounds very helpful, but I would also ask to have the data punched against just his age, as those numbers are important.

I just saw it, thank you! I will certainly be calling tomorrow, because I want the rest of the pieces. Thanks again for your help. smile
Posted By: aculady Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/22/11 03:04 AM
Originally Posted by Amber
Just came across this on his report,


I'm not sure if this part, "Because ****, who was just turning 4, was beyond the norms for Kindergarten, the scores above compare him to beginning 1st graders." means that he was scored as a first grader, or if his scores are at a first grade level.

He was scored as if he was a beginning first grader, but his scores reflect that he *performed* more like a child beginning second grade (for the lowest reading scores, 2.1) or third grade (for the highest one, 3.1). So, at age four, he is performing three to four years ahead of age peers.

I don't really think there is any doubt that he is "severely" gifted.
Posted By: BWBShari Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/22/11 04:00 AM
Acu... Not "severely"
Round here we refer to that as Wicked Smart!!

Welcome aboard Amber!
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/22/11 02:02 PM
So, is there a way to score him as a 4 year old? I have to admit I'm really confused at this point. I tried googling the answer but I couldn't find it.
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/22/11 02:14 PM
That makes sense. Thank you. smile
Posted By: st pauli girl Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/22/11 03:07 PM
Welcome Amber! This all sounds familiar to me. Before my DS started kindy, the school tested him on WJ-III. Since we had DYS in mind, already having IQ scores, we asked if they could get broad math and broad reading scores. The school tester told us she was only able to norm for 6 year olds (and DS had just turned 5), but she figured it anyway, telling us that the actually scores would be higher, but she couldn't say what they would be.

On a personal note as to public school, our DS did fine in regular, age-based kindergarten, but we did do a lot of advocating to get him appropriate work. He ended up skipping 1st in the same local school district, and doing fine in 2nd grade, with lots of advocating on our part. We do live "near" a large metro area, and an opportunity came up to transfer to a public HG school, so we did that mid-year, which is working fine, with no advocacy necessary as of yet. So, as others have said, I think there are ways to make things work wherever you happen to be, whether it be lots of advocacy at the school, afterschooling, homeschooling, etc., but the important thing is that you are aware at a very early stage of potential issues that your child will face in school, and so you will be able to make it work.
Posted By: Amber Re: New here, WPPSI & WJ-III - 02/23/11 09:03 PM
Thank you! We are currently having the age old debate of whether or not to enter him into K early or leave him be. We are applying to the gifted charter just in case.I appreciate the encouragement. smile
© Gifted Issues Discussion Forum