0 members (),
177
guests, and
13
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783 |
I had to laugh when I looked at this list that my son's school district uses: Factors Which Support Acceleration/Promotion of a Student
�� Student attends school regularly. �� Student regularly completes all class work, homework, and usually does more work than required. �� Student is mature for age and appears socially and academically ready for promotion/acceleration. �� Student participates fully in all differentiated instruction. �� Parents participate in all conferences and support fully the student�s activities, i.e. homework, extra activities, projects, etc. Factors Which Do Not Support Acceleration/Promotion of a Student
�� Student is often absent. �� Student does not regularly complete assignments. �� Student appears socially immature. �� Parents do not support all student activities and may miss conferences. �� Student does not put forth maximum effort. Especially the "does not put forth maximum effort" clause. How could my son possibly be putting forth his "maximum effort" in a setting that is at least 2 grade levels below his readiness level? Cathy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,207
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,207 |
Ohh - That is scary. At least they put their ideas out in a clear form. These are exactly the 'reasons' my DS was denied appropriate placement in the public school. I do feel your pain here!
It's like a 'through the looking glass view of giftedness.'
((shrug)) Grinity
Coaching available, at SchoolSuccessSolutions.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783 |
I think it's just designed so they won't have to do anything: If the kid is performing well, socially well-adjusted, participating in everything, then there's no problem--why would the school want to change anything? If the kid is blowing off schoolwork, misbehaving, missing school, etc., then he doesn't "deserve" to be accelerated. Once again, we are status-quo. It's just easier for the school that way... Cathy
Last edited by Cathy A; 01/29/08 01:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145 |
Kriston
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,134
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,134 |
Eeek ... that kind of spells it out for you! You have my sympathy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783 |
Well, I think we're ok. I think the principal is on DS's side and thinks that accelerating him is a reasonable thing to do (even though she personally wouldn't "do that" to her child). I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
Apparently, this is a lengthy process involving a Student Study Team and we may have to wait for standardized test results in April to know for sure. I'm just trying to be patient.
Cathy
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 865
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 865 |
Bureaucrats!
There is a girl that the principal of the middle school keeps talking about (though she's graduated) as the most "gifted" student. While I really like the young lady, she did not score into "gifted" (130) on IQ test but is an extremely hard worker, pleasant, well-behaved. She progressed through Alg 2 in middle school (I think it was helped by mom being the math teacher and the girl spent 2 hrs after school every day doing additional math).
In my mind, it worries me that an educator/administrator is so confused about the profile of a real "gifted" kid. My kids WON'T work 2 extra hrs a day on math (or anything). They're hard workers but on their on terms (only if the project is engaging to them). They can be naughty or slightly disruptive (nothing serious), and usually they want to skip school if there is it's boring boring boring. Don't these contradict those school's skipping requirements?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145 |
I think all of this has a lot to do with wanting to reward the kids teachers like--and those are the bright but not bored kids. (Or if they're bored, their personality is such that they don't act out to show their boredom.)
I can say this because I WAS that kid, and I was rewarded for my teacher's pet behavior time and time again. But I was probably MG, I think, certainly NOT PG. And the boredom just turned me into a perfectionist, so even with the rewards, it wasn't good for me.
It's a darn shame educators and administrators don't understand GTness better! Rules like these are ridiculous.
Kriston
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 830
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 830 |
I had to laugh when I looked at this list that my son's school district uses: Factors Which Support Acceleration/Promotion of a Student
�� Student attends school regularly. �� Student regularly completes all class work, homework, and usually does more work than required. �� Student is mature for age and appears socially and academically ready for promotion/acceleration. �� Student participates fully in all differentiated instruction. �� Parents participate in all conferences and support fully the student�s activities, i.e. homework, extra activities, projects, etc. Factors Which Do Not Support Acceleration/Promotion of a Student
�� Student is often absent. �� Student does not regularly complete assignments. �� Student appears socially immature. �� Parents do not support all student activities and may miss conferences. �� Student does not put forth maximum effort. Especially the "does not put forth maximum effort" clause. How could my son possibly be putting forth his "maximum effort" in a setting that is at least 2 grade levels below his readiness level? Cathy OK, I just got my Iowa Acceleration Scale Manual book in the mail yesterday, and I'm sick with a fever & sore throat so I may have misunderstood what I briefly read, but I thought these items were listed in the Iowa Acceleration Scale Manual, as you have them written. Of course, they are only a part of what's to be considered. A number of people here recommended the Iowa Acceleration Scale Manual, does it list these things?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533 |
Yes, it does list these things, but with more or less weight for each one. There are a total of 80 points possible, with 22 of those coming directly from test scores. Attendence is worth a max of 3 points. Completing homework is worth a max of 3 points. Social maturity -- well, there's a whole section on this, worth a max of 16 points with choices of 0, 1, 2, 3 and sometimes 4 on five questions. Paticipating fully in differentiated instruction: Does that mean that they're enrolled in all differentiation options, or that they are trying their hardest and getting all As in their advanced classes? Not sure what this means. Parental involvement is worth a max of 3 points. Interestingly, "School attitude and support" is also worth 3 points. That's not on the list ... wonder why? Ha! So yes, those factors are listed, but it's not quite that black and white. There are a lot of other factors that are weighted just as heavily, like the child's size (max of 3 points for being bigger than age) and participation in extracurriculars (max of 3 points). Putting those 5 items on a list and calling it a day doesn't seem very in-depth to me. Was this article posted on this site or another one? I think it's fascinating and very telling: http://www.wrightslaw.com/advoc/articles/ALESSI1.htmlIt's about special needs kids, and it absolutely applies to gifted children.
Last edited by Mia; 01/30/08 09:25 AM. Reason: clarity
Mia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145 |
Iowa is weighted, and things like these receive little weight compared to academic readiness. So with Iowa, a child who doesn't do extra work is not necessarily penalized. Here, in list form, it seems like whether the parents had to work and couldn't attend the parent-teacher conference is at least as important--and maybe more important!--than if the child is bored silly in school!
Oh, and on Iowa, I believe that having "pushy" parents is weighted as bad as (or maybe worse than?) having parents who don't show up for conferences. That's not at all reflected on the school's list.
Kriston
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145 |
Sorry, Mia, our posts crossed! So, yeah, what she said!
Kriston
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533 |
LOL! Too funny, Kriston! You were much more succinct than I.
Mia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 778
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 778 |
That is a great article! I love that website! The Wrights provide the desperately needed glimmer of sanity and logic that so many parents depend on to navigate the ridiculous scenarios presented by the schools to try to preserve there own best interests at any cost.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 830
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 830 |
So, if Cathy showed up at the school and said, "yes, those things can be considered, but here's the rest of the story", do you think the school will listen?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145 |
I'd pretty much ignore their list altogether and ask for the school to fill out the Iowa for the child. It's the gold standard. Advocating for a grade skip without the Iowa is going to be a lot more difficult, I'd think.
Kriston
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533 |
So, if Cathy showed up at the school and said, "yes, those things can be considered, but here's the rest of the story", do you think the school will listen? Hmm, I think that depends! They might, but it would be far more likely to work if the school had used the IAS before. If they had, I'd ask them to use it with the child, to look at those factors in a broader context. If they hadn't used it before, it might take convincing them to get the IAS or at least to recognise it as valid. Trouble is, they might not be interested in doing that! It's hard to get schools to change. Still, it might be worth a shot -- or at least pointing out that there are other factors that should be considered.
Mia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 533 |
LOL, Kriston -- we're on the same wavelength today!
Mia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,145 |
Great minds think alike!
Kriston
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783 |
For completeness, here is the rest of the form: Criteria for Acceleration The teacher(s) of record for students in grades K-8 will recommend acceleration for student(s) who meet the criteria listed below unless the teacher specifies in writing that acceleration is not appropriate for this student(s).
1. Student performs at Advanced on Standards Portion of STAR Test in math and reading/English/language arts. 2. Student is developmentally ready for promotion/acceleration. 3. Student performs at least two grade levels above present class. Acceleration Recommended �� Teacher recommends acceleration/promotion. �� Alternative modifications to address student�s strengths/needs have been made at site. �� Student data/performance has been analyzed at report card period and acceleration is recommended. �� Parents have been informed of child�s progress and the recommendation for acceleration. Parents are willing. Acceleration Not Recommended �� Teacher does not recommend acceleration/promotion. �� No modifications to student�s program has been attempted at site. �� Student data/performance has been analyzed and acceleration is not recommended. �� Parent has been notified of child�s progress and is against acceleration. I like the idea of pointing out that these (and other) factors are considered on the IAS. Right now, I'm sort of waiting to see if the teacher goes along with it. I don't think she's pro-acceleration and it looks like it's all up to her... Hopefully, she'll agree to it if she thinks the principal wants her to. Cathy
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783 |
Things that irk me:
1. The teacher's opinion is gospel.
2. If modifications to the student's program have not been attempted, then acceleration is not recommended. So all they have to do is refuse to provide modifications and then they don't have to accelerate, either!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 802 |
Cathy: I don't know if you are looking for acceleration options for your child, did not read this thread very carefully. But if yes , shop around. If you can afford (time and transportation) to have your child in a different school, in a different district - shop around. With so many charter schools poping around this days, there are other options. Shop around for teachers as well. A teacher I have met recently told me that gifted and talented money could come from the same pool as special ed.!!! Imagine that! She is looking into a program now that she can use for my DD and pilot it for other "above average" kids at the school.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,134
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,134 |
Cathy - you are so right. That teacher's opinion business is absolutely ridiculous. I'd say that is fine as long as the teacher has had thorough training in GT identification and education.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,783 |
Ania, I think using SPED money for GT depends on what state you are in. Unfortunately, I have shopped around. There are only two charter schools in my area and they are not suitable. The private schools all have waiting lists and are not inclined to do anything special for anyone. I think we need to move to a different state
|
|
|
|
|