Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 86 guests, and 12 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Amelia Willson, jordanstephen, LucyCoffee, Wes, moldypodzol
    11,533 Registered Users
    October
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
    Austin #64284 12/17/09 05:48 AM
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 127
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 127
    Quote
    Yup. A lot of Asian kids spend 2-3 hours a day studying while little johnny is playing sports. Little johnny gets to sweep floors for a living while the other kids become doctors and nurses.

    Well, I take exception to the cultural stereotyping.
    However, I agree with the statement about the relative time involved for sports vs academics. DD in middle school has 3-4 hours of homework every night. Her classmates involved in sports spend 3 plus hours every night with team practice and games. DD has decided that she can't afford to spend that much time away from academics, so she chose not to try out for any teams this year. I think it's a very mature decision.

    Gifted Mom #64468 12/19/09 11:00 AM
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 282
    T
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 282
    Originally Posted by Gifted Mom
    I think red shirting does muddy the water for gifted kids
    I completely agree with this idea--even amongst kids who are actually gifted, I think that this can be confusing.

    Our DD was one of 4 kids in her K class who were considered an academic cluster. However, she was nearly a full year younger than two of those kids. This was not due to redshirting, just to late summer/early fall birthdays. Still, I have come to believe that performing/learning at the same level/rate as kids almost a year older is significant at that age. As kids age and share instructional experiences, perhaps making within grade comparisons becomes more valid--regardless of age, classmates would have at least the same number of instructional years under their belt. However, when they're just starting school, I think that the age differences are more telling--especially when the kids you are compared to are already leaps and bounds beyond the rest of the class.

    DD's ability to keep up with, and in some areas consistently exceed the benchmarks set by the peers in her cluster, was one of the significant "aha" factors in our starting to think about giftedness. I realized that if she had been born five weeks later (thereby starting kindergarten a year later), she would certainly have been *vastly* ahead of even her strongest grade level peers.

    I don't at all regret starting her on time. I do think though, that being clustered with "same age" peers who were really a year older, obscured her school's sense of her as a learner. Certainly it made it easier for them to brush off our concerns.

    That said, I think the solution is probably not about the question of when to start children in school, it's about the question of improving identification tools/protocols. It seems to me that while, achievment measures are most appropriately based on grade level (post kindergarten/first grade), aptitude types of measures need to be age based and more widely administered and used. That would make it more obvious when a child might need a more compacted curriculum and/or other types of interventions.

    Taminy #64473 12/19/09 11:33 AM
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 2,172
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 2,172
    Wonderful post, Taminy. You put my thoughts together much more cohesively and with much less emotional rambling. I am more bothered by those issues of younger kids being brushed off when compared to older grade peers due to seeing what that exact thing did with younger dd. My oldest managed to be so obviously different that it was hard not to recognize her as gifted even with a fall bd and being younger. My youngest blended in more with the bright kids and wound up being tracked such that it has taken much longer for the school to realize that she was unusual. As a result, her image of herself has been really set as someone who isn't that bright. It certainly wasn't helped by a year with a teacher who was convinced that she wasn't that bright and let dd know that, of course, and that had much more to do with a poor teacher than anything else.

    Cricket2 #64480 12/19/09 06:04 PM
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 330
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 330
    Quote
    I think the solution is probably not about the question of when to start children in school, it's about the question of improving identification tools/protocols.

    Great comment.

    Polly

    lulu #64538 12/20/09 07:54 PM
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 75
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 75
    Originally Posted by lulu
    The problem with 'red shirting' or whatever you want to call it, is that it changes the whole dynamic of what a Kindergarten class (or later grades) should be. Exceptional circumstances for red shirting make sense, but the regular use of red-shirting doesn't help anyone. When a relatively large percentage of a class (often boys) are red-shirted, this changes the average class age, and the maturity expectations of Kindergarten. This in turn gives false indications of what should be happening in a Class, from academic ability, to structured work and the length of time the children are expected to sit still without talking! It may help a single child to be one of the oldest in a class, but obviously someone has to be the youngest. I think a better solution is to expect the class to be one year group (use Malcolm Gladwell's age sorting for reading etc. maybe), but have the teachers, including those for Specials, and even Lunch time helpers, be clearly aware of who the young ones in a class are, and let them make exceptions for these children. Better this than classes we have now, with often 18 month age differences, but no differences in expectations made.


    It can also make it that much harder to get the school to agree to acceleration or grade skipping, since they are afraid of creating a situation where a very young child who needs the grade skip would be put into a class of children mostly 18 to even 30 months older.

    I agree that *very* selective redshirting can be beneficial for children who need a bit more time. But in my limited experience, it is more often used by uber competitive parents (whether for academic or sports reasons) or recommended by schools more worried about test scores and how an older student population gives them a higher average score.


    on edit- I should have read the other posts first, since others already pointed out these issues! : )

    Last edited by MonetFan; 12/20/09 08:10 PM.
    MonetFan #64581 12/21/09 03:41 PM
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 51
    J
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    J
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 51
    It is very hard to hold a gifted kid back. We have been trying to slow down DS4 because of his emotional maturity, well not exactly. To us he is actually more mature for his age, always tries to be good kid, actually extra hard but that just isn't enough at school. Things like being adamant at times and interrupting are the issues we are facing now.
    He is reading like a champ, I would say at second, third grade level, started doing multiplication on his own and many other things and this is when we are trying him to slow down, scares me like hell.

    Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

    Moderated by  M-Moderator, Mark D. 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Help with WISC-V composite scores
    by aeh - 10/28/24 02:43 PM
    i Am genius and no one understands me!!!
    by Eagle Mum - 10/23/24 04:11 PM
    Classroom support for advanced reader
    by Heidi_Hunter - 10/14/24 03:50 AM
    2e Dyslexia/Dysgraphia schools
    by Jwack - 10/12/24 08:38 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5