It sounds OK to me, especially if you keep the posts to one thread (which members may easily identify and skip over if so desired), but others may feel differently. The Board Rules suggest contacting admin if you have any questions on this:
Spam messages are prohibited on this forum and include the following:
Any message posted for the sole purpose of selling something.
Any message posted for the sole purpose of soliciting financial contributions to a cause, organization or other entity. If a member believes that there is a legitimate need to post such a message, s/he should contact the moderator.
Any message posted for the primary purpose of driving increased site visits, such as repeated links to a blog, commercial site or other organization.
Clearly, during the course of a discussion, members will link to sites that are relevant to the topic. Drawing attention to resources and sources of information contributes positively to a discussion and is an important part of any online conversation. Members may also start threads with links that interest others. Providing links in this way is encouraged. In contrast, the no-spam rule specifically prohibits manufactured attempts at driving people to a particular site. As an example, repeated linking by a member to a personal site is potential spamming behavior.
Because gray areas exist with regard to this subject, the moderator has the sole authority to determine what posts are spam. Members who believe that they have identified spam should contact the moderator, who will make a decision, and, if necessary, contact the offending party and/or revoke that person’s posting privileges. If you have any questions about the above board guidelines, please contact a d m i n . . .
Three more thoughts:
1) Might your blog reveal your identity? Board Rules discourage this.
2) Some members have their blog web address in their signature line, added to posts on this forum.
3) Expect some pushback on content. For example, there was a bit of controversy on the forums when a well-known children's building-block manufacturer announced pink building blocks, to encourage girls in engineering, as a STEM field. Some objected to the stereotype that girls like pink, and felt the initiative was damaging to girls, rather than encouraging.
