I agree-- socialization IS critical for kids who have struggles in that arena...
but--
She is struggling socially so I would hate to pull her out to homeschool and have less opportunities to socialize.
I am going to challenge that a bit.
Is this true? In what context? How is that statement UN-true?
Actually, homeschooling
can provide a BETTER opportunity to work on the issues that need the most intervention or explicit instruction/practice. For most kids, that is academic learning... for HG+ children, though, it may well be something else.
The problem is that this isn't what a classroom environment is set up to do, see-- so if YOUR child would ideally spend 75-90% of her school day "learning appropriate social interactions with peers," then that puts a bit of a monkey wrench in things if those same peers need to be spending 75-85% of
their school day doing things like learning to read, recognize patterns, understand simple directions, and work with basic math operations.
The one thing interferes with the other objective, basically.
That's why I'm going to say that while figuring out what the challenges ARE is a good thing, it's not necessarily going to point to a workable solution in a 2e child.
SO. A child that needs to spend a great deal MORE time interacting with others and learning to read social cues might well be better off spending that time in a mixed-age cohort of real people doing real things. Librarians, store clerks, etc. etc. Homeschooling is
really not socially isolating unless you choose to make it that way.
Maybe "homeschooling" isn't about academics for those children-- at least not directly. Remember, being HG+ buys you a LOT of latitude in academics and formal instructional time. You can afford to pick and choose what seems most important and rest easy (well, okay eas
ier) that the child isn't going to be falling too far behind academically as a result.